Dolan repeats the lie of Wojtyła that the Old Covenant continues along side the New Covenant.
Dolan is a manifest heretic.
Indeed, Wojtyla's lie is manifest heresy contrary to the dogmatic teaching of the Council of Florence. Even Father Kramer used Bergoglio's open denial of Florence on this point to accuse Jorge of manifest heresy. Problem for Father Kramer is that, as you point out, Wojtyla basically invented this heresy, and Ratzinger repeated it ... but somehow Fr. Kramer reads the internal forum and determines that Jorge really meant it, was a "pertinacious formal" heretic, whereas Wojtyla and Ratzinger were merely mistaken. We cannot make judgments regarding the internal forum (as Kramer interprets the term pertinacious formal), but pertinacity is merely indicates that one tenaciously clings to a heresy, and that can be discerened in the external forum. When they (all three of them) have taught this heresy repeatedly, it's clearly not just some slip of the tongue or a brain fart, but it represents a belief they cling to and that suffices for pertinacity. Pertinacity excludes situations where you mis-spoke or tripped up or just blundered in your thinking, where if someone corrected you, "hey, what you said, the way you said it, that was heretical", and the individual immediately were to say, "oh, sorry ... I should rephrase that", that is the type of situation that the pertinacity qualifier was meant to exclude from the equation. But it's clear that Wojtyla, Ratzinger, and Berogoglio have all been quite persistent in repeatedly teaching this heresy.