“Is Francis really the pope?” is the question being asked by an increasing number of Catholics whether online, amongst family and friends, in conversations with trusted clergy, or in the privacy of their own troubled hearts and minds.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/we-shouldnt-be-afraid-of-concluding-that-francis-isnt-pope-heres-why/

Matthew McCusker. It's on the left side of the picture.

Conclusions

Matt Gaspers rejects the more common opinion of theologians that material public heretics are severed from the Church of Christ and instead adheres to the minority opinion that formal heresy is necessary. Yet he neither defends the minority position by credible arguments, nor answers the formidable objections that have been raised against it.

And, even if Gaspers is right, and the minority position is actually true, it will do nothing to save the claims of Francis. As a result of his objective words and actions, Francis has demonstrated that he is a public heretic. This alone raises sufficient doubt about his membership of the Church to destroy his claim to be the pope, her visible head.

Thanks.  He wrote it and doesn't just edit that section?