Ever heard of a "hostile witness"? It's where you quote someone whose evidence tends to support YOUR argument or conclusion -- an argument the hostile witness would DISAGREE with, or in fact DID disagree with until his death.

But so many times I see normies focusing on that witness's opinion, as if that were all that matters -- nevermind the facts, or what the evidence shows logically.

In a similar vein --

Do you all realize what "losing an argument" looks like? It's when you resort to logical fallacies. But especially annoying is when they say things like:

"Well, your argument seems to prove flat earth and I've got nothing. BUT if that were true, if that were the slam-dunk evidence that my brain tells me it is, then the Establishment would be Flat Earth, and they are not. Ergo you are wrong."

That is a classic case of appeal to authority fallacy. Why do people not care about objective truth and/or logic in current year?

Things that would have been eminently embarrassing -- as in "never show your face in the public light again" embarrassment -- are shrugged off with no shame at all by people today. Modern men are completely shameless. How do you shame someone who won't be shamed -- who is literally shameless?