They're not "regulations." I made a quick list from memory based on my previous
reading of the Raccolta and several traditional (pre-Vatican II) Daily Missals.
The Rosary is the most heavily indulgenced prayer in the Church outside of Mass
and the Divine Office (of which Mass is a reflection, liturgically, but is higher in
indulgence and grace because it is a mystical and unbloody re-enactment of
Calvary, as well as a Sacrament, and the Office is neither of those).
Ask any traditional priest, but don't bother asking a new order priest because
they do not study indulgences in seminary, and it's not necessarily their fault
for being ignorant of the topic, any more that it's a medical doctor's fault for
being ignorant of nutrition, since they spend about one hour in medical school
on the subject, during which hour the professor usually makes crude jokes
about how stupid the study of nutrition is, if you can imagine that.
But I digress.
If you find an error in what I posted, please post your correction.
If you don't find an error, would you say so?
While it is true that indulgences should be renewed from time to time, and as I
recall, it's a matter of about 40 years or thereabouts, we are presently in a state
of EMERGENCY, which is the basis of the SSPX, independent priests, the
controversy of SUPPLIED JURISDICTION, and stuff like that. Therefore, the
renewal of indulgences can be said to have been on hold ever since the last
time they were renewed, and some of those may have been almost 100 years
ago, when the Raccolta was in wide use, for example.
It is our duty, as post-Modern Catholics, to pass on the traditions we have
received, since the Pope and most bishops have dropped the ball
(notwithstanding the well-intentioned claims of sedevacantists, to be sure).
EXAMPLE:
We have JPII introducing the "luminous mysteries" to the Rosary, and it is
easily criticized on the sole matter of the FACT that he gave the luminous
mysteries no indulgence whatsoever. Nor did he even mention the topic
of indulgence in any official capacity during the entire term of his 28 year office
or whatever obscene number of years it was. He had plenty of time, is
the point. But not a word on indulgences. Correct me if I'm wrong!
I know some trads who get all in a fluff and storm out when a group starts
praying the Luminous Mysteries. I don't do that. I simply meditate instead,
on one of the other 3, as the situation dictates. You see, no one can force
you to meditate on something they demand. That, by the grace of God, is
the one jurisdiction over which each one of us will always maintain sovereignty.
A group can be praying the Rosary having announced the luminous mysteries,
and any individual(s) in the group can choose to meditate on the Sorrowful
Mysteries instead, and no one in the group is the wiser.
But Our Lady knows, and God knows.
I don't know how that affects the indulgences that you would receive, for those
who are praying the luminous mysteries do not get the Rosary indulgences
that they would get if they meditated on the other 3 rosary groups of mysteries.
And therefore, while you do get indulgence for meditating on the Sorrowful
Mysteries at the same time, for example, you may not necessarily receive
any additional indulgence from the others' prayers in the group, as you would
if they had been praying the Sorrowful Mysteries, for example, since there
are no indulgences for the luminous mysteries.
So, to pass on the tradition that we have received, we are able to say that
we do not recommend the luminous mysteries, for the simple fact that we did
not receive the luminous mysteries from tradition, but rather from the mere
whims of a pope who was an ENEMY of tradition across the board. I don't need
to post the reasons, do I? And we have no precedent, as far as I know (do you?)
to say whether a pope who disdains tradition per se, did everything in
his power to REDEFINE what Tradition is (even while he abhorred the practice
of definition for its proper object and only practiced it in OPPOSITION to its
proper object) and acts in opposition to it, is able to change traditional practices
without adverse effects on the practices of the faithful or the very Faith itself.
For it is in the right practice of DEFINITION that the Pope is a good pope, and it
is with the proper intention of his invoking the Holy Ghost in his condemnation
of error that a good Pope "stands in the way" of the Antichrist and protects Holy
Mother Church from corruption from out of the pit of hell itself.