Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Was milk allowed during Lent before Vatican 2?  (Read 1947 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Was milk allowed during Lent before Vatican 2?
« Reply #10 on: December 26, 2020, 05:45:07 PM »
So, is that enough time to do some actual research?  Or have we become THAT lazy?

There are numerous, easily-located resources which will provide the history and the answer.

got milk?
You're quite the prick aren't you? If I knew where to find the answer I wouldn't be asking here would I? 

Re: Was milk allowed during Lent before Vatican 2?
« Reply #11 on: December 26, 2020, 05:53:15 PM »

From Thomas Aquinas


Re: Was milk allowed during Lent before Vatican 2?
« Reply #12 on: December 26, 2020, 05:53:50 PM »
From Thomas Aquinas
Ash Wednesday and Good Friday were “black fasts.” This means no food at all.
Other days of Lent: no food until 3pm, the hour of Our Lord’s death. Water was allowed, and as was the case for the time due to sanitary concerns, watered-down beer and wine. After the advent of tea and coffee, these beverages were permitted.
No animal meats or fats.
No eggs.
No dairy products (lacticinia) – that is, eggs, milk, cheese, cream, butter, etc.
Sundays were days of less liturgical discipline, but the fasting rules above remained.

Offline trad123

  • Supporter
Re: Was milk allowed during Lent before Vatican 2?
« Reply #13 on: December 26, 2020, 06:03:21 PM »
https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05789c.htm


Ecclesiastical approbation. Nihil Obstat. May 1, 1909. Remy Lafort, Censor. Imprimatur. +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York.



Quote
In some places eggs, milk, butter, cheese and fish are prohibited, while bread, cake, fruit, herbs and vegetables are allowed. In other places, milk, eggs, cheese, butter and fish are permitted, owing either to custom or to Indult. This is the case in the United States. However, in order to form judgments perfectly safe concerning this point, the Lenten regulations of each diocese should be carefully read. Finally, a little tea, coffee, chocolate or such like beverage together with a morsel of bread or a cracker is now allowed in the morning. Strictly speaking, whatever may be classified under the head of liquids may be taken as drink or medicine at any time of the day or night on fasting days. Hence, water, lemonade, soda, water, ginger ale, wine, beer and similar drinks may be taken on fasting days outside meal time even though such beverages may, to some extent, prove nutritious. Coffee, tea, diluted chocolate, electuaries made of sugar, juniper berries, and citron may be taken on fasting days, outside meal time, as medicine by those who find them conducive to health. Honey, milk, soup, broth, oil or anything else having the nature of food, is not allowed under either of the two categories already specified.

Offline trad123

  • Supporter
Re: Was milk allowed during Lent before Vatican 2?
« Reply #14 on: December 26, 2020, 06:07:05 PM »
https://www.cmri.org/adsum/adsum-2016-12.pdf




Quote
On a fast day, such as a weekday in Lent or an Ember day, those who are obliged to fast may drink between meals, as often as they wish, liquids which are not very nourishing. Such liquids would be tea, coffee, wine, beer, and (according to the generous interpretation of most of the bishops of the United States in their regulations concerning fast and abstinence) milk, and undiluted fruit juices. But on a fast day one who is obliged to fast may not take between meals such liquids as soup, egg-nog, cream, etc., which are practically as nourishing as solid food.