I'm not sure I completely understand this debate, as I haven't read every post, but formal repentance is necessary even if materially the damage can't be undone.  If they have the intention to repent, they can be baptized, go to Confession, etc.

It's similar to any other sin that requires restitution of some kind.  Let's say I steal $10,000 and spent it.  I repent and intend to pay it back, even though I can't right now and may never be able to.  I can be forgiven as long as I intend to do my best to make restitution.  Then you have to try.

As for public vs. private Baptism, Baptism is inherently public, as it determines membership in the Church, and requires witnesses precisely for that reason.  Yet, it could be quasi-private in the sense that the ceremony need not be performed in front of the broader public.  This may be done to avoid scandal.

I'm not sure I completely understand this debate, as I haven't read every post, but formal repentance is necessary even if materially the damage can't be undone.  If they have the intention to repent, they can be baptized, go to Confession, etc.

It's similar to any other sin that requires restitution of some kind.  Let's say I steal $10,000 and spent it.  I repent and intend to pay it back, even though I can't right now and may never be able to.  I can be forgiven as long as I intend to do my best to make restitution.  Then you have to try.

As for public vs. private Baptism, Baptism is inherently public, as it determines membership in the Church, and requires witnesses precisely for that reason.  Yet, it could be quasi-private in the sense that the ceremony need not be performed in front of the broader public.  This may be done to avoid scandal. [emphasis added]

You have accurately distilled the gravamen.

The narrow focus of criticism was specifically aimed at those who present with an appearance that suggests no repentance, no "restitution," mocking and opposing Catholic morals and dogma.

I even provided example photos for the willfully dyslexic and snarky who raised the straw men of "unforgivable sin," "gynecomastia," "hirsuitism," and a load of other irrelevant crap. Since the femboy photo is now missing, I assume it was too risque to remain here, but the photos should have made the point to those who willfully evaded the point, willfully denying that pattern recognition delineates congenital hermaphroditism and virilization/feminization syndromes from willful sɛҳuąƖ self-mutilation, delineates those innocent and repentant from those contumacious and rebellious.

None of those things are necessary for baptism.

Regarding 1917 Canon 748 (which has no equivalent in the 1983 Code), which deals with baptism in the case of deformed or abnormal fetal humans, canonist Charles Augustine, O.S.B., D.D., writes in A Commentary on the New Code of Canon Law, on Can. 748:
{Even hermaphrodites with predominate male aspect can be validly (albeit illicitly) ordained.}

After ignoring several clear statements of the focused criticism, you continue to engage in straw man arguments.

Mentioning pattern recognition of features manifesting opposition to Catholic morals and dogma is not a claim that any certain body part is mandated in Canon Law.

You also continue to conflate unfortunate congenital anomalies with willful sɛҳuąƖ self-mutilation.

It is becoming more clear that you intend to be a deceiver and cloud the issue. What is your major malfunction, Geremia?

After ignoring several clear statements of the focused criticism, you continue to engage in straw man arguments.

Mentioning pattern recognition of features manifesting opposition to Catholic morals and dogma is not a claim that any certain body part is mandated in Canon Law.

You also continue to conflate unfortunate congenital anomalies with willful sɛҳuąƖ self-mutilation.

It is becoming more clear that you intend to be a deceiver and cloud the issue. What is your major malfunction, Geremia?

In this thread Geremia never recanted his conflation of an unfortunate unwilled birth defect (congenital hermaphroditism) with willful sɛҳuąƖ mutilation (surgical transɛҳuąƖism).

If someone is caught in an accidental mistake (e.g., "Hey, your fly is open."), no ill will can be imputed… however, once the mistake is pointed and you refuse to fix the mistake, it is reasonable to consider that the "mistake" is actually intentional. 

So, over 8 months since you were called on your error, you still haven't acknowledged or recanted the "mistake."

Geremia, you are long overdue "zipping up"!

So? Isn't baptism for sinners?

Baptism is for sinners who are in a state of grace.

You should read Genesis- God made male and God made female.  

Non Catholics, Catholics who are in a state of sin shouldn’t be God parents.  

The Vatican are liars and deceivers.  They love the Olympic ceremony.  They are the anti Christ.



Transgender believers can be baptised in the Catholic Church, if it would not cause scandal or “confusion”, the Vatican said Wednesday, clarifying a sensitive area of doctrine. 
Wolves in sheep clothing.  They are liars and deceivers. Read your bibles, Catholics. 

Baptism is for sinners who are in a state of grace.

And you can't have sanctifying grace unless you're baptized.