. . . Many of his criticisms could equally apply to frozen liberal modernists also. (aka those who are attached to the dust of their failed modernist theories.)
What does it say about him that he chose to level criticism at tradition rather than modernism?
“Could equally apply?” Am I correct to infer that you find his criticism of tradition correct and just? And how is your assertion that “his criticisms could equally apply to frozen liberal modernists also” supposed to make traditionalists any fonder of him? The goofy old effeminate commie chose to level criticism at traditionalists.