Scientists have abundant evidence that birth control has significant health benefits for women and their families, it is docuмented to significantly reduce health costs, and is the most commonly taken drug in America by young and middle-aged women. This rule will provide women with greater access to contraception by requiring coverage and by prohibiting cost sharing.

http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2012pres/01/20120120a.html

Obama broke the news to NY Abp. Dolan personally by phone this morning.

What a class act.  :really-mad2:

The US Bishops were effectively pro-Obama.

And I don't doubt the Vatican was as well.

Of course when you elect an affirmative action negro under a regime of political correctness people are afraid that being too critical will mean being branded as "racist"

And we know that avoiding the "racist" label means more to most Catholics than being Catholic.

Essentially now plans have to cover birth control as well as abortion...  Well, they were already evil.  

And arent 'contraceptives' in the form of the pill actually not contraceptive at all but abortive sine a fertilized egg would be aborted from the womb?

I say its typical of US politicians in general. How many Republican leaders have really done anything about it, apart form saying they're going to do something about it.

This is completely in-your-face, though, and the Obama hyena pack knows it.

I guess I'd rather it be in my face, than pretending it doesn't exist  :sad:

That's why the chief hyena called Abp. Dolan personally. Another line has been drawn in the sand, with the expectation that the Church will back down, again.

Republicans are cowards but I can't remember any of them actually initiating pro-abortion legislation, or bills to expand abortion or birth control coverage, or mandate that "family planning" be promoted by our diplomatic corps overseas. There is still a difference between the two parties on this issue.

I think that its all a game. They many not initiate any legislation, but that doesn't mean they're not in on the scheme. As it'd been said before (raoul?), if we can believe that our own Church has been infiltrated by bad men, what's to say out own government hasn't experienced the same; especially given that it was founded by masons, and on masonic principles?  

The Devil is the Master of Deceit, right?

What would be better than for him to give the impression that you're serving God in the True Church, when you're not?

What would be better than to give the impression that you have a voice in preventing these morally evil issues, when you really don't?