Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Very Ironic Passage from the JP II Catechism  (Read 510 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cryptinox

  • Supporter
Very Ironic Passage from the JP II Catechism
« on: April 22, 2022, 08:23:03 PM »

Quote
2286 Scandal can be provoked by LAWS or INSTITUTIONS, by FASHION or OPINION.
Therefore, THEY ARE GUILTY OF SCANDAL WHO ESTABLISH LAWS OR SOCIAL STRUCTURES LEADING TO THE DECLINE OF MORALS AND THE CORRUPTION OF RELIGIOUS PRACTICE, or to “social conditions that, intentionally or not, make Christian conduct and obedience to the Commandments difficult and practically impossible (Pius XII, Discourse, June 1, 1941).” This is also true of business leaders who make rules encouraging fraud, teachers who provoke their children to anger (Cf. Eph 6:4; Col. 3:21), or manipulators of public opinion who turn it away from moral values.
2287 Anyone who uses the power at his disposal in such a way that it leads others to do wrong becomes guilty of scandal and responsible for the evil that he has directly or indirectly encouraged. “Temptations to sin are sure to come; but woe to him by whom they come! (Lk 17:1)”

Hmmm laws leading to decline of morals and religious practice? Sounds familiar but I can't quite put my finger on it. :confused::facepalm:

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Very Ironic Passage from the JP II Catechism
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2022, 09:01:05 PM »
For the most part, JP2 was solid on Catholic morals (putting aside his Theology of the Body ... which the pervs have taken and run with).

That's why so many conservative Catholics consider JP2 to be an orthodox pope, even a saint.

But while he was doing that with his right hand, with his left he promoted religious indifferentism like no other "pope" before or since, not even Bergoglio.  Bergoglio's Pachamama incident pales in comparison to what Wojtyla did (at Assisi and about a hundred other times).

I believe that's what Wojtyla's job was, to suck conservative Catholics into religious indifferentism because they were distracted by his strong traditional moral teaching.  And it worked brilliantly.  Of course, while he talked a good game about morals, he did nothing to enforce it and looked the other way when his principles were being grossly violated, did nothing about abortion that he railed against in his letters.

Once he did his damage, God's Rottweiler, the erstwhile uber-Modernist Ratzinger, whose books contain more heresy per page than anything Bergoglio ever wrote, was appointed to play the part of a Trad, to reel in the Indulterers and even many SSPXer R&R types.  He issued his Motu, spoke in Latin, etc. ... despite being best buddies with some of the most flagrant heretics, and never recanting the heresies in his own books.  He nearly succeeded in assimilating the SSPX, but then Bishop Williamson opined about the h0Ɩ0h0αx and scuttled the whole thing.  Having failed in his sole mission, he was told to step aside.

So they decided to go for it with Bergoglio, who now specializes in undermining the traditional moral teaching of the Church that JP2 pretended to uphold.  I think they got frustrated with the failure to assimilate SSPX and made an uncharacteristically foolish move by rolling out Bergoglio.

Bergoglio is now starting to wake up some of those who had been fooled and lulled in by Wojtyla and Ratzinger.  I saw Taylor Marshall, for instance, because of the Pachamama, start to take a fresh look at JP2's Assisi and Koran kissing, etc.

That's why I believe the one prophecy about the schism being exposed after about 12 years of the millennium had passed (Bergoglio was "elected", aka installed, in early 2013) and he's starting to wake people up about the entire Conciliar sham.  Even among the conservative Novus Ordites you have an increasing Bennyvacantist movement.  While they miss the bigger picture, at least the wheels are starting to turn in their minds about the false Conciliar religion.