Author Topic: Unchastity of the eyes culpability today (Read 2324 times)

BTNYC · « **Reply #10 on:** April 28, 2015, 11:21:17 PM »

Quote from: Matto

Quote from: Ladislaus
Christopher West routinely mocks people who try to keep custody of the eyes (JP2's "Theology of the Body" ya know), implying that the men who do this are basically perverts. Maybe he could instruct the many saints who did that about the error of their ways.

Wasn't he told by the Novus Ordo hierarchy to stop giving talks because he was too immoral even for them?

Yes. I believe the final straw was when he actually advocated full-on (but "incomplete") sodomy as an acceptable prelude to the Marital Act.

But who knows? Now that we're in the "era of mercy," I'm sure there'll be a place for his brand of perversity. "Who am I to judge?" Look for his comeback in the near future... sometime after October of this year, I'd say.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #11 on:** April 29, 2015, 08:20:35 AM »

Well, that's saying something when even the Novus Ordo hierarchy condemns you.

Miseremini · « **Reply #12 on:** April 29, 2015, 10:42:29 AM »

Quote from: BTNYC

Yes. I believe the final straw was when he actually advocated full-on (but "incomplete") sodomy as an acceptable prelude to the Marital Act.

We may have to go out into the world but we don't have to read it so explicitly here!!

:geezer:

misericordianos · « **Reply #13 on:** April 29, 2015, 06:14:00 PM »

Quote from: Miseremini

Really??? 2 thumbs down for objecting to reading explicit sin on Cathinfo???

Is this what is allowed now on a supposed tradiional Catholic forum for both men and women to view??

We are supposed to guard our senses, (eyes) yet someone thinks it's OK to print garbage on a site where we thought we were safe.
:geezer:

Even the best of us live in the modern world.

But you’re right. A thumbs up for ya.

We be in the same family of mercy/misery.

Matthew · « **Reply #14 on:** April 29, 2015, 06:22:35 PM »

His language was not explicit. You apparently have never seen "explicit".

The topic is another question. But I think he brought up the topic in good faith, to help us all "place" this Christopher West individual -- what his position/morals/views are, etc. That is important for us Catholics to determine. Is he one of those liberals? Should his books be avoided? and so forth.

I think BTNYC's language was acceptable for a Catholic, mixed-company forum.