Poche,

That South Carolina NAACP Chapter president wasn't accused of lying about racial profiling, he was PROVEN to be lying when the police released the footage.

Just like the footage of Michael Brown strongarming that store - although the agitators then accused the police of trying to malign the character of Michael Brown.  Which reminds me, we still don't know what the charge was that sent him to that boy's prison-home.

It's too bad the cop who shot Michael Brown wasn't wearing a body cam because then we wouldn't have to have relied almost entirely on forensic evidence.

It's also too bad Mr. Zimmerman wasn't wearing a body cam when he shot Trayvon Martin while Trayvon was smashing Mr. Zimmerman's head into the pavement.

StarCucks

Unrelated to this particular case but related to loitering in general: I think it's perfectly reasonable for a coffee shop, restaurant, etc. to ask customers to leave if they either (a) haven't bought anything, or (b) are staying excessive lengths of time after finishing their meal/coffee(especially if it's busy), or (c) they're causing a disturbance(as these gangster types usually do, speaking extremely loud with curses every few words).

And I think in the past most people would've agreed with me on that, and yet recently there's been huge uproar over people being kicked out for loitering that Starbucks are allowing anyone to use their spaces without needing to purchase anything, so effectively approving loitering. People can now walk into Starbucks and stay there all day long without buying a thing, all because of some screeching on Twitter. It's a horrible business decision that will lead to overcrowding and unpleasant experiences for their actual customers, and I wouldn't be surprised if they go bankrupt down the line because of it.