This is close to blasphemy. I know you're using "emotional"/poetic language but this is just wrong to say.
God had to destroy the world in Noah's days because it was completely corrupt - murders, sorcery, satanism, wars, human sacrifice, etc. It was the only way that God could "reset" humanity. God did not promise He wouldn't destroy the earth again (which He will at the 3 days of darkness - again, because we are out of control), He only promised He wouldn't do it by flooding.
Circuмcision might be "cruel" but so it eternal fire. Christ's crucifixion was "cruel" but it was the only way that you could go to heaven. As +W always says, "God is not a nice puppy dog."
You know this whole women are emotional thing is getting out of hand I think.
I’m not being blasphemous. I’m simply stating I know the kind of God I follow, and I don’t romanticize Him. He has called for some harsh, and scary things to be down for the worlds good. He’s always been pretty clear on what we are supposed to be doing. Once Jesus died on the cross it ended the need to fulfill the promise through circuмcision (and all the rules in the Old Testament).
Circuмcision has been needed in very few situations, but on whole it’s a very over used practice that is in fact brutal... needed or not. Circuмcision should not be done on infants because there is absolutely no medical need of it. (Until they grow up, and POSSIBLY have a medical need for it).