Author Topic: Trad Women Who Wear Short Shorts Bikinis (Read 20544 times)

Telesphorus · « **Reply #70 on:** October 20, 2012, 10:54:49 AM »

Quote from: bowler

As you know, the law says differently.

Lol, really? You have quite an imagination as to what the moral and civil laws happen to be.

Quote

And, well, if the parents don't want that, they better not let them dress to attract, or else teach them what is going to happen when they "attract".

Parents need to stop deluding themselves about their daughters. That's one of the main problems traditionalism is having.

bowler · « **Reply #71 on:** October 20, 2012, 10:55:15 AM »

Quote from: Jaynek

Quote from: bowler
Quote from: Telesphorus
It would be mortally sinful to dress in a way calculated to inflame venereal passions.

That's what I was saying.

Wouldn't it be more striking to say that to a girl, than to say that they shouldn't dress a certain way because it is immodest?

No, because some girls just wear clothes that are in fashion in order to fit in and aren't thinking about men's passion. These girls still need to dress modestly and it is not good to teach them to think very much about men's passion.

Good point. However, once they do "know", I think the modesty argument is weak.

bowler · « **Reply #72 on:** October 20, 2012, 11:19:02 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote
And, well, if the parents don't want that, they better not let them dress to attract, or else teach them what is going to happen when they "attract".

Parents need to stop deluding themselves about their daughters. That's one of the main problems traditionalism is having.

You are saying that Jaynek is deluding herself to think that "some girls just wear clothes that are in fashion in order to fit in", and you think that they are knowingly thinking about men's passion when they wear those clothes?

Quote from: Jaynek

Quote from: bowler
Quote from: Telesphorus
It would be mortally sinful to dress in a way calculated to inflame venereal passions.

That's what I was saying.

Wouldn't it be more striking to say that to a girl, than to say that they shouldn't dress a certain way because it is immodest?

No, because some girls just wear clothes that are in fashion in order to fit in and aren't thinking about men's passion. These girls still need to dress modestly and it is not good to teach them to think very much about men's passion.

Jaynek · « **Reply #73 on:** October 20, 2012, 11:22:48 AM »

Quote from: bowler

Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote from: bowler
As an aside, a priest once told a mother that her daughters should not dress to attract men, unless they are of age to get married.

Age 16 is old enough to start accepting suitors.

As you know, the law says differently. And, well, if the parents don't want that, they better not let them dress to attract, or else teach them what is going to happen when they "attract".

I am not sure where you live, but girls can marry at sixteen in most jurisdictions in Western countries. One of my daughters married at 18 (to a man in his 30s) and I do not think there was anything wrong with this.

Jaynek · « **Reply #74 on:** October 20, 2012, 11:31:00 AM »

Quote from: bowler

Quote from: Jaynek
Quote from: bowler
Quote from: Telesphorus
It would be mortally sinful to dress in a way calculated to inflame venereal passions.

That's what I was saying.

Wouldn't it be more striking to say that to a girl, than to say that they shouldn't dress a certain way because it is immodest?

No, because some girls just wear clothes that are in fashion in order to fit in and aren't thinking about men's passion. These girls still need to dress modestly and it is not good to teach them to think very much about men's passion.

Good point. However, once they do "know", I think the modesty argument is weak.

Girls do not understand what boys and men experience and teaching girls to dwell on this is just asking for trouble. It is possible to teach modesty without a focus on passion and this is much more suitable for girls.