Why do you suppose they even created the term to conveniently attack those with an alternate view on various events and issues?

I mean, so-called "Conspiracy Theorists" are supposed to be harmless mental patients, are they not? Aren't mental patients one of the benign "victim classes" these days? I've never heard anyone accuse Conspiracy Theorists of being potential terrorists, alt-right, or any of that. Usually they're just considered crazy and maybe stupid.

In this day and age, where criminals are supposed to be pitied (not punished), where every debased behavior is justified -- even abortion. Why is hatred reserved ONLY for a few select groups:

Pro-life
Trump supporters
Whites/Males/those who aren't fαɢɢօts
Those who believe Moon Landing is a hoax
Those who don't make use of vaccines (Anti-Vaxers)
and of course nαzιs.

That's about it. If you hate those groups, you're awesome and your head is screwed on right! You (alone) have a valid worldview.
Anyone else -- even just opposing or criticizing, not even hating -- you're a monster and a literal nαzι.

It’s true. I always say that I’m not allowed to have an opinion, or that it’s just simply invalid because I’m a white, heterosɛҳuąƖ, trad Catholic male, who doesn’t support vaccines, which to most people means I want to murder my children and everyone else’s children. But it’s ok to kill them in the womb! This worlds thinking is completely backwards and this is the result of society removing itself from God. 

Less than a year later, I'm reading complaints that the Evil Google, which is lately apparently even more corporately full of itself from its earlier exercises of autocratic technological censorship on YouTube, has broadened their censorship, quite possibly without offering any convincing explanations.  So now they are disappearing videos that they deem to have met any of these conditions:

• critical of WHO or CDC.

• critical of WHO's subservience to Red China [☭], including bald-faced lying to protect the latter's pride in what had been a widely favorable international reputation, but undeserved even then [×].

• recommending treatments of Coronavirus that come from experienced front-line M.D.s, but fail to yield to treatments promoted by WHO or CDC.  That might even include the "unapproved application" "off-label" with hydroxychloroquine + zinc publicized by Pres. Trump.

• (Likely also any) drawing attention the failed leadership of WHO and CDC, who are such sources of medical brilliance that they have repeated flip-flop their recommendations.

-------
Note ☭: Pres. Trump had pointed out, in a previous press-conference, that the U.S.A. had been annually paying 6 times the amount of the expenses of WHO that Red China had been paying.  Fortunately for the U.S.A., Trump eventually reached his own "enough already!" moment.  Confronted with a comparable situation, Obama would probably have apologized to Red China for casting any doubt on the international reputation of their Maoist workers' paradise, and meekly continued the grossly inequitable payments.

Note ×: Chair of the U.N.'s Human Rights Commission!?  In whose universe of alternative history does Red China deserve such an international honor!?

The answer is:
People who believe the government and the mainstream media,
are afraid to think for themselves, afraid to be different from their
friends, and afraid of being attacked by anyone (even a little girl).
.
But mostly, they are as Bp. Williamson calls them, "Dopey Joes".
Just stupid and proud of it.  If they want to take the vaccine,
maybe it's really for OUR own good.
.

Yep. Let the willfully dumb weed themselves out of society and the gene pool. Natural selection.