Thank you for the info. I'm hoping I can open it without having to download the whole file.
No, what I meant by "interpretation" is that certain Bible verses have a very specific interpretation made/taught by the Church (ie. Magisterium). An example would be "This is my Body...". The Church interpretation is often explained/described in Catholic biblical commentaries or in catechisms, etc. In this case, I have not seen such explanation put forth for Romans 11:26. This leads me to believe that there isn't a specific Church/magisterial interpretation for it.
I'm not sure exactly what you are referring to, but I see you're not happy with those who have questioned some sources. As Catholics, shouldn't we? I would want to know that I am at least reading a pre-Vatican II source. Isn't this what Trads typically do when investigating any Church teaching?
I am totally in favor of judicious skepticism.
That said, there is nothing judicious about refusing to first read and then judge the content of references simply because one has an animus against the source.
Unfortunately skepticism rises to crippling levels in a few posters here. If I can read the #$%%^ damned effing rabbis, the
ignorati here can certainly deign to read Hoffman and Sungenis without peeing their panties.
If they read a source and then make honest criticism, fine, but the intellectual dishonesty here is rising with the influx of newbie trolls (and a couple of vestigial trolls as well).
Most recently I think about the newbie jerk "AMDG forever"
(or more likely, a returned banned troll) who self-identified as a sede, but insisted it was sinful to read Hoffman because it had no imprimatur. What an effing hypocrite! A sede should know that the Church is in disarray and so requiring a trustworthy imprimatur restricts us to the past. Well… be my guest… dress in a frock coat and read nothing new.

Consider that while Sungenis's book has no imprimatur, he cites
St. Jerome, St. Thomas Aquinas, Pope St. Gregory the Great, et al. and demonstrates persuasively that Fr. Mawdsley's book is untrustworthy. Sungenis is not infallible, but his sources are. Living entirely in the past with your head up your… um… dusty books is absurd.
P.S. What's the big deal about downloading an entire 2.8Mb file? Are you still using "floppy disks"?