Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo  (Read 59809 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Martius

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Reputation: +28/-19
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
« Reply #45 on: November 30, 2024, 05:27:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • With regards to being a newbie, I've been lurking since around 2015, and as Mark79 was saying don't post often. I only made the account to comment on the neoSSPX selling out on the dethjab, and other flagrant things.

    Offline richard

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 363
    • Reputation: +248/-28
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #46 on: November 30, 2024, 09:34:49 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • The worst part of it all is that "Trumptards" and "TDSers" and "in-betweeners" will all have to suffer and survive Trump's тαℓмυdic reign.… if indeed we do survive.
    I agree with what you are saying but do you think we would have survived if the other candidate had won?


    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12480
    • Reputation: +8267/-1581
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #47 on: November 30, 2024, 10:29:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • I agree with what you are saying but do you think we would have survived if the other candidate had won?

    No. All candidates are owned by Satan and his ѕуηαgσgυє. Nobody gets the (((media))) spotlight unless they serve the (((agenda))), even if their role is only managed opposition. When agents of their (((agenda))) become powerful or dangerous (e.g., "know too much"), they are taken down.

    Maybe you missed where I have said "TINVOWOOT" (There Is No Voting our Way Out of This).

    Hour by hour the news reveals that we continue on the path to the "kinetic" phase of WW3 and likely cινιℓ ωαr as well.

    Before the ink dried on the pages of the тαℓмυd, the tactic of instigating and profiting from pitting gentile against gentile was enshrined in Judaism. Since the 19th century the Jєωs have put to print their plans for 3 world wars, all intended to exterminate and/or enslave the "sparks" of the Gentiles in order to hasten arrival of their moshiach (messiah) to reign over the world. My site was shoahed, but you can still read archived versions of the Kabbalah https://archive.is/pUzHY and World Wars https://archive.is/YkgqC pages.










    “All sincere Jєωs admit that Judaism is a beautiful religion.
    Those who go deeper into the study of Judaism will readily state that it is not only a beautiful but also a necessary religion.
    The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.”
    — Rabbi Dr. Samuel Felix Mendelsohn


    The Sentinel (The American Jєωιѕн Weekly, Chicago), Vol. 128—No. 2, October 8, 1942, p.9.

    It is key to note that the Jєωs had total control over Germany for many years before Hitler came to power, and knowing they were planning another world war, they had a long time to establish a crypto-Jєωιѕн fifth column for the transition to Hitlerite/National Socialist Germany. The grand Jєωιѕн conspiracy (The Chabad Rabbinate) hand picks crypto-Jєωs to be in positions of power that they know they can scrub their biographies/background & that was the case with Hitler & other NS leaders.

    …and now you see the same tactic at work in every US Presidential administration.


    Rabbis explain how Jєωιѕн 'doctrine' demands Western civilization (Amalek/Esau/Edom) must be destroyed for moshiach [“messiah,” The Anti-Christ] to come:



    “Abarbanel explains “sa’aros teiman” to mean the evildoers of Edom (America, Christianity), whose first chief was named Teiman. The pasuk is thus implying that Hashem will go to war [WW3] against the nations because of the evil that Edom did against His nation.”
    Pg 40

    Rabbi Mendel Kessen reveals how Esau (Edom, Rome, West) is to be the scapegoat for the sins of the Jєωs, according to тαℓмυdic prescription.

    "The ultimate proof is in the book 'Yalkut Reuveni,” a vast compendium of midrashim  [early rabbinic commentaries] indicating that G-d is going to take all the sins of the Jєωιѕн people and throw them onto Esav (Esau). It is as if G-d says 'You are the cause of all their sins because of what you did to them, that being the climate and provocation you instigated.'”
    Rabbi Mendel Kessin: The Purification of America in the End of Days
    by Robin Diamond, Times of Israel, June 15, 2020, 19th paragraph

    The duty to exterminate Amalek*  was already accomplished in the Old Testament,** but new Amalek still live on in perpetual Jєωιѕн paranoia.

    In their satanic blood lust, Jєωs have never ceased defining new Amalek, Haman, Esau, and Edom. They burn eternally with a blood lust to exterminate all non-Jєωs and to subjugate any survivors.

    They believe their moshiach will not come until they exterminate us all.

    Their demand of God,—“Moshiach now!”—should be chilling and no source of amusement because it is a call for our extermination by any and all means: pestilence, famine, and war.

    In a horrifying nexus of Christian revelation and Kabbalistic prophesy, The Anti-Christ will reign for a time.



    Rabbis explain how Jєωιѕн 'doctrine' demands Western civilization (Amalek/Esau-Edom) must be destroyed for moshiach [“messiah,” The Anti-Christ] to come:

    Jєωιѕн Supremacy Exposed


    Play
    00:00
    00:00
    Mute
    Settings
    PIPEnter fullscreen



    Play




    Transcript:

    And also a negative commandment 59 that it is a mitzvah [religious duty] and a command to wipe out from among all the descendants of Esau, the descendants of Amalek, male and female, young and old. What is Amalek? Says Hasidus, Amalek represent the concept of doubt. They put a doubt into everything that you want to do. That is why they are so evil. That is Amalek. That is why Amalek is so terrible and they have to be totally uprooted. Therefore God tells us we should erase their memory and we should eradicate them from the face of the earth. So when a Jєω enters into edif, enters into the land of Israel, what should he do? The first thing is to appoint a king. Step 2: Destroy Amalek. Who is Amalek? Amalek comes from Esau. Esau was a brother to Jacob.

    Esau who in modern day terms who is really basically, you know, uhhh, certainly one of them is America. Esau became Edom which is a nation. Edom became Rome. Instead of it being Rome, it became Christianity. Christianity, of course, ultimately became Western Civilization, so Esau of today is really Western Civilization.

    [cuts to Netanyahu clip] …but the New Rome, the United States.…

    Esau is Europe and the United States.

    The Throne of God is incomplete until we destroy Amalek.

    Any nation that has that religion can be considered Esau.

    The audacity, the chutzpah, to destroy Amalek and to cut off the offsprings of the nation of Amalek.he goes on to say, “How do we do this today?”

    What would be the most Jєωιѕн thing for the last Jєω to do?

    The most appropriate thing… He said the last thing that a Jєω should do when he or she leaves Europe is to spit.

    Also archived at: Jєωs Explain How They are Commanded to Exterminate Western Civilization
    by Mukunda Dasa, February 28, 2021

    Amalek

    Amalek (also “Amalec”) was a grandson of Esau (Genesis 35:12). Amalek’s lineage came to be known as Amalechites or “Amalek.” (Hebrew: עֲמָלֵק‎)

    Jєωs make a great pretense of “kindness to neighbors,” but that is a lie. Judaism defines a hierarchy with Jєωs as the only “humans” (adam) and a variety of lesser status Gentiles as non-humans due no decent treatment:
    • ger tzedek (Hebrew: גר צדק‎, “righteous alien” ), a full convert to Judaism who can never have the same status as someone born of a Jєω
    • ger toshav (Hebrew: גר תושב‎, ger: “foreigner” or “alien” + toshav: “resident,” lit. “resident alien,” conquered people, a Noahide
    • nokri (Hebrew: נָכְרִי, “stranger”)
    • sakir (Hebrew: שָׂכִיר, “hireling”)
    • amalek (Hebrew: עֲמָלֵק‎) originally a biblical tribe destroyed completely by the Israelites, but in contemporary usage refers to anyone the Jєωs want to exterminate now.
    The indignities suffered—including not just usury, theft, deceit, but even murder and total extermination of gentiles—condoned and/or unpunished by Judaism is white-washed and rationalized in many sources. See “context.”

    Who does God say are Amalek?

    While the Jєωs rested at Rephidim following their escape from Egypt, they were attacked by Amalekites. God thus commanded:

    Remember what Amalec did to thee in the way when thou camest out of Egypt: How he met thee: and slew the hindmost of the army, who sat down, being weary, when thou wast spent with hunger and labour, and he feared not God.  Therefore when the Lord thy God shall give thee rest, and shall have subdued all the nations round about in the land which he hath promised thee: thou shalt blot out his name from under heaven. See thou forget it not. Deuteronomy 25:17-19

    The destruction of the Amalekites is recorded in Exodus 17:8-16, but the Amalek live on in Jєωιѕн paranoia.

    Because of the Jєωs’ pathological eternal perpetuation of “Esau hates Jacob” (Genesis 27:41 ff), anyone or anything that opposes them is deemed of Esau, “Amalek,” and must be totally exterminated.  Recall that these are the people who incessantly whine that they were targeted for extermination.

    This persistent paranoia is a pervasive and recurrent them throughout Jєωιѕн history. For example, see:
    Why Does Esau Hate Jacob?
    By Yanki Tauber

    The paranoia often becomes self-fulfilling because Jєωs act out their paranoia. Clueless and willful, the Jєωs refuse to admit or understand their paranoia as cause of the effects they incessantly bemoan.

    Emboldened and intoxicated by their recent hegemony, Jєωs have identified Christians and all of Western Civilization, Europe and the USA, as Amalek to be totally exterminated.

    Who does Chabad say are Amalek?

    According to Chabad: “The Amalekites, descendants of Amalek, were an ancient biblical nation living near the land of Canaan. They were the first nation to attack the Jєωιѕн people after the Exodus from Egypt, and they are seen as the archetypal enemy of the Jєωs. The nation of Amalek is long gone, but they live on as the internal enemies that we each battle on a daily basis.”

    Who Were Amalek and the Amalekites?
    by Boruch Altein

    Jєωs identify Amalek variously as sowers of doubt, the epitome of evil, Christianity, Western Civilization, and Netanyahu himself identifed the USA in the video below as Amalek (somewhat astonishing in view of the tribute of money and blood that the USA has made for the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan’s project in the Holy Land.

    The Jєωs have constructed an elaborate delusional system surrounding their mitzvot (religious duties) to totally exterminate “Amalek.”

    Among many, see:
    Peninei Halakha
    Book Zeminim, Chapter 14, The Month of Adar
    04. The Three Mitzvot Concerning the Obliteration of Amalek
    05. The Mitzva to Wipe Out Amalek

    Amalek


    Play
    00:00
    00:00
    Mute
    Settings
    PIPEnter fullscreen



    Play




    cινιℓ ωαr to marginalize the ‘the right’ • prelude of the Jєωιѕн plan

    Political analyst compares Republican supporters to ‘Hitler voters’ ahead of midterms.

    ABC News Panelist Panelist Matthew Dowd Compares End of Trump Presidency To End Of nαzι Germany (a claim that is as absurd as it is inflammatory in light of Trump’s perpetual subservience to the Jєωs)

    Rabbi Cohen, 1996:

    "We are about to turn the American people against the American patriots and produce the International Man! The One World patriot loyal to the United Nations and subservient to our law is becoming a fact. In our lifetime, we shall witness the destruction of Christian America and the supremacy of our ruling authority over the Goyim of the Western democracies!" [¶19]…

    “We need to turn the minority Goyim of America against the Republican Party at all costs.[¶23]]…

    “‘Divide and conquer’ is a very old and useful strategy. All Goyim would like to be at peace and to love one anther but our Jєωιѕн media keeps racism at a slow boil. We teach them to hate one another but to respect, to have compassion towards and reverence for the Jєω. We teach them to accept as a fact the innate racism of America and the innate benevolence of the Jєω. Thus, they shall destroy one another while holding us in great respect and honour! As long as they don't turn off the television and they continue to read the Jєωιѕн owned newspapers and magazines, we can control them. But woe to us if they ever learn who their real tormentors are! [¶24]…

    “As long as we can keep all the colours in turmoil and keep their prejudices building, then during the final weeks before the elections, we will turn all of their pent up rage against the angry white bigots whom we will represent as Republicans, right-wing militias, extremists, gun-nuts, and Christians. The Goyim listen because our message is everywhere, in all of our media at once. So, they believe the big lie.” [¶29]

    “Signs of the Times”
    Bible Believers’ Newsletter 610

    Chabad-Biden narrative for Jєωιѕн-planned US cινιℓ ωαr/Revolution • bringing the Eurasian World Order and “moshiach”


    https://gab.com/stmichaelssword/posts/108929092606917003


    and, of course, Trump continues on the same path, See: https://archive.is/7dPgx


    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12480
    • Reputation: +8267/-1581
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #48 on: November 30, 2024, 10:40:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Trump is intimately connected through his daughter, son-in-law, and advisers to Chabad, the most virulent and powerful group of worldwide organized Jewry. It was reported in 2017 that Trump had himself converted to Judaism under a Chabad rabbi.

    Understand what Chabad believes, preaches, and abets! https://archive.is/4LuAs 










    Read the highlighted section carefully:

    "…in a time of war or in a time when the Jews have control over the gentiles."

    Do you see their age-old plan now?

    Kabbalah, Chabad, global domination, and extermination of Western Peoples and Civilization
     






    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4161
    • Reputation: +2305/-1226
    • Gender: Female
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #49 on: November 30, 2024, 01:05:39 PM »
  • Thanks!5
  • No Thanks!0
  • Unless you define TDS as being any opposition to Trump, I don't think it applies to Lad. All he was trying to do was get people to justify their vote for Trump using the Catholic moral principle of double effect. He explicitly stated that if you could successfully do that, then he would concede his argument. I think only one person even made an attempt at using double effect to justify a vote for Trump, and Lad praised them for trying.

    There was, however, no good reason for people to justify their vote for Trump using the principle of double effect.  That is not how moral theology works.  It is not a field in which one can simply work things out from basic principles as one does in math.  We also look at what has been handed on from the past by recognized authoritative writers.  These opinions, while not carrying the same sort of weight as magisterial teaching, are crucial to how we determine which actions are morally permissible.  Ignoring this step is the moral theology equivalent to saying that we ought to receive Communion in the hand because that is what the early Christians did.

    We don't even need to understand the basic principles; we can just accept the conclusions of the moral theologians.  And we don't even need to know what those are, if we have priests and bishops we trust to pass this on to us.  The Church does not require average lay people to study moral theology.  Lad had no right to demand something that is not required by the Church or to claim that people who can not do this are stupid.

    When we look at what has been taught by the acknowledged authorities, we see that they have reached a consensus on the morality of voting.  They say that it is permissible to vote for a bad candidate in order to prevent the election of a worse one.  Voting for a bad candidate because one agrees with his sinful policies is formal cooperation with evil and therefore sinful. But voting for a bad candidate to prevent a worse is only material cooperation with evil and not sinful.  Furthermore, some moral theologians use the expression "choosing the lesser evil" to describe this view, being careful to clarify that it is not a general principle and should not be universally applied.  

    In other words, Lad is opposed to the consensus view of traditional Catholic moral theologians.  He had no right whatsoever to claim that those who follow that view have sinned mortally or even gravely.  He did not even have a good case for saying they were wrong.

    Posters like Emile and 2Vermont, who kept trying to discuss relevant views of the theologians, were the ones taking the traditional approach to moral theology.  At one point, 2Vermont produced a couple of articles endorsed by Pius X which conclusively showed both the consensus opinion of moral theologians and the fact that they sometimes used the expression "choose the lesser evil".  Ladislaus did not respond with "logic and Catholic principles". His exact words were "she [2Vermont] needs to be verbally slapped upside the head." 

     
    Lad was objectively wrong in his opinion and his behaviour was inappropriate.  People should not be defending him.








    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12480
    • Reputation: +8267/-1581
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #50 on: November 30, 2024, 01:23:55 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!5
  • …When we look at what has been taught by the acknowledged authorities, …

    Name an authority of the stature of Sts. Thomas More or Thomas Aquinas who support your thesis.

    St. Thomas More was martyred because he opposed 1 divorce. Your faction struggles to exculpate yourselves for supporting a 94% abortionist and 100% genocidalist and the consequent death of millions.

    To claim that the low-level clerical bloggers cited so far are "acknowledged authorities" is laughable, mere puffery. Your approbation is on the level of forged credentials.

    As you fleetingly confessed:

    Quote
    These opinions, while not carrying the same sort of weight as magisterial teaching…

    Further, "the people" defending Lad have focused on the dishonesty, straw men, illogic, and emotionalism employed against him by PaxVobis and his ilk.


    Offline Emile

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2440
    • Reputation: +1870/-136
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #51 on: November 30, 2024, 01:51:31 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • There was, however, no good reason for people to justify their vote for Trump using the principle of double effect.  That is not how moral theology works.  It is not a field in which one can simply work things out from basic principles as one does in math.  We also look at what has been handed on from the past by recognized authoritative writers.  These opinions, while not carrying the same sort of weight as magisterial teaching, are crucial to how we determine which actions are morally permissible.  Ignoring this step is the moral theology equivalent to saying that we ought to receive Communion in the hand because that is what the early Christians did.

    We don't even need to understand the basic principles; we can just accept the conclusions of the moral theologians.  And we don't even need to know what those are, if we have priests and bishops we trust to pass this on to us.  The Church does not require average lay people to study moral theology.  Lad had no right to demand something that is not required by the Church or to claim that people who can not do this are stupid.

    When we look at what has been taught by the acknowledged authorities, we see that they have reached a consensus on the morality of voting.  They say that it is permissible to vote for a bad candidate in order to prevent the election of a worse one.  Voting for a bad candidate because one agrees with his sinful policies is formal cooperation with evil and therefore sinful. But voting for a bad candidate to prevent a worse is only material cooperation with evil and not sinful.  Furthermore, some moral theologians use the expression "choosing the lesser evil" to describe this view, being careful to clarify that it is not a general principle and should not be universally applied. 

    In other words, Lad is opposed to the consensus view of traditional Catholic moral theologians.  He had no right whatsoever to claim that those who follow that view have sinned mortally or even gravely.  He did not even have a good case for saying they were wrong.

    Posters like Emile and 2Vermont, who kept trying to discuss relevant views of the theologians, were the ones taking the traditional approach to moral theology.  At one point, 2Vermont produced a couple of articles endorsed by Pius X which conclusively showed both the consensus opinion of moral theologians and the fact that they sometimes used the expression "choose the lesser evil".  Ladislaus did not respond with "logic and Catholic principles". His exact words were "she [2Vermont] needs to be verbally slapped upside the head."

     
    Lad was objectively wrong in his opinion and his behaviour was inappropriate.  People should not be defending him.

    GB deserves credit also for his research: https://www.cathinfo.com/politics-and-world-leaders/the-martyrs'-stand-choosing-christ-over-compromise-in-today's-political-land/msg957298/#msg957298

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11380
    • Reputation: +6350/-1115
    • Gender: Female
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #52 on: November 30, 2024, 02:21:14 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!3
  • Unless you define TDS as being any opposition to Trump, I don't think it applies to Lad. All he was trying to do was get people to justify their vote for Trump using the Catholic moral principle of double effect. He explicitly stated that if you could successfully do that, then he would concede his argument. I think only one person even made an attempt at using double effect to justify a vote for Trump, and Lad praised them for trying.

    Perhaps attributing mortal sin to voting for Trump is a little strong considering that no one (I hope) on this forum who voted for Trump specifically voted for him because of his select evil promises, but given the gravity of what Trump has pledged to support, I understand why Lad argued so.
    (1) "Successfully"? Once again according to who?  Like alaric said in another thread, the Gospel according to Ladislaus.  :laugh1: Why should anyone here have to answer to him?

    (2) "perhaps attributing mortal sin ....... is a little strong"?  :facepalm:


    Offline Emile

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2440
    • Reputation: +1870/-136
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #53 on: November 30, 2024, 02:33:10 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Name an authority of the stature of Sts. Thomas More or Thomas Aquinas who support your thesis.
    ....
    I am personally unaware of any living person that is of the stature of St. Thomas Aquinas or St. Thomas More to which we could turn. As it is, we're left to turn to trad clerics, prayer, and our own researches of Popes, Saints, and theologians of the past. It is therefore unavoidable that even sincere individuals will come to different conclusions.

    I strive to avoid arrogating Papal authority to myself and also reject when others attempt their own arrogation. As my Irish grandfather might say (please pardon the somewhat crude country expression), the opinion of "pope" Emile I, "pope" Ladislaus I, "pope" Mark79 I, and all the other keyboard "popes", carries about as much weight as a fart in the wind.

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12480
    • Reputation: +8267/-1581
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #54 on: November 30, 2024, 02:55:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Hmmmm… I've heard the simile as "like a fart in a skillet." :laugh1:

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12480
    • Reputation: +8267/-1581
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #55 on: November 30, 2024, 03:01:10 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2

  • GB deserves credit also for his research: https://www.cathinfo.com/politics-and-world-leaders/the-martyrs'-stand-choosing-christ-over-compromise-in-today's-political-land/msg957298/#msg957298

    Agree. GB adduced worthy authorities, opening the door to rational argumentation that a 94% abortionist/100% genocidalist (Trump) really fits the bill as "less unworthy" than a 100% abortionist/94% genocidalist (Kackles).

    Have at it.

    'splain how a 94% abortionist/100% genocidalist really fits the bill as "less unworthy" than a 100% abo
    rtionist/94% genocidalist.


    :popcorn:


    Offline Emile

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2440
    • Reputation: +1870/-136
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #56 on: November 30, 2024, 03:01:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Hmmmm… I've heard the simile as "like a fart in a skillet." :laugh1:
    Thanks, I hadn't heard that one. I'll add it to my repository! :laugh1:

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12480
    • Reputation: +8267/-1581
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #57 on: November 30, 2024, 03:07:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Agree. GB adduced worthy authorities, opening the door to rational argumentation that a 94% abortionist/100% genocidalist (Trump) really fits the bill as "less unworthy" than a 100% abortionist/94% genocidalist (Kackles).

    Have at it.

    'splain how a 94% abortionist/100% genocidalist really fits the bill as "less unworthy" than a 100% abo
    rtionist/94% genocidalist.


    :popcorn:


    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4065
    • Reputation: +2405/-524
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #58 on: November 30, 2024, 03:10:48 PM »
  • Thanks!5
  • No Thanks!0
  • Unless you define TDS as being any opposition to Trump, I don't think it applies to Lad.
    .

    The reason I say Ladislaus had TDS was because he would quote left-wing talking points about Trump all the time, like saying Trump had a fragile ego, or that he would use childish insults, or things like this. Ladislaus just got these ideas from Trump Deranged content in the mainstream media and repeated it like it was true.

    Moreover, his attitude towards Trump was truly deranged. TDS causes its sufferers to lose any form of rationality and be filled with fury when anyone likes Trump. That is exactly how Ladislaus was. He wasn't upset just because people disagreed with him about Trump. Ladislaus disagreed with lots of people on this forum all the time about all kinds of things, and sometimes he would get upset, but it was never really out of control. He posted on this forum for over a decade, every single day, and a good chunk of every single day for over ten years. He had an uncountable number of disagreements with the same number of people. Yet he never left until ... the Donald Trump topic began to be discussed. The one thing he couldn't handle without completely losing it was people supporting Trump, and he completely walked away from the last ten years of his life that he spent here over ... people liking and supporting Donald Trump. That doesn't strike you as deranged? Trump Derangement Syndrome?

    Accusing people of mortal sin for voting for Trump, when no traditional priest has ever said such a thing and he just uses theological mumbo-jumbo to justify it ... that doesn't strike you as deranged?

    Is Trump the first Republican president or presidential candidate who has espoused limited support for abortion? Of course not. They all have, for decades now. Yet what traditional Catholic have you ever heard of who ever said it would be a mortal sin to vote for the Republican candidate in a presidential election? Nobody, that's who. The whole "mortal sin to vote for Trump" was completely deranged.

    Quote
    All he was trying to do was get people to justify their vote for Trump using the Catholic moral principle of double effect.

    An action is licit until proven otherwise. Ladislaus should know this with all his huffing and puffing about "moral theology 101" every time his TDS flared up. Nobody who voted for Trump needs to justify anything. It is Ladislaus who needs to justify his made-up sins, and the accusations he leveled at others on the basis of them.

    I mean, I'm kind of sad to see him go too, but he caused an enormous amount of scandal over the Trump election. Maybe it's better he takes that garbage somewhere else.

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12480
    • Reputation: +8267/-1581
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Wisest Thing Ever Said on CathInfo
    « Reply #59 on: November 30, 2024, 03:16:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
  • Agree. GB adduced worthy authorities, opening the door to rational argumentation that a 94% abortionist/100% genocidalist (Trump) really fits the bill as "less unworthy" than a 100% abortionist/94% genocidalist (Kackles).

    Have at it.

    'splain how a 94% abortionist/100% genocidalist really fits the bill as "less unworthy" than a 100% abo
    rtionist/94% genocidalist.


    :popcorn:


    Trump is a problem for the entire world; Lad is not a problem for the entire world, so…

    Instead of playing punching bag with Lad, please be so kind as to illuminate us all and explain how a 94% abortionist/100% genocidalist really fits the bill as "less unworthy" than a 100% abortionist/94% genocidalist.