Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916  (Read 3485 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3479
  • Reputation: +2006/-447
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
« Reply #15 on: October 06, 2022, 10:23:21 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I would like ti bring this discussion down to earth.

    Is there any dance you can think of that might not be sinful?
    You probably can't name one.
    Is anyone dancing that today?
    No.

    So when someone asks you is dancing sinful you say: almost every dance is sinful.

    We are talking of course about mixed dances which are basically all dances.

    If  you want to lean left and right in your room and call that a dance nobody is talking about that.
    .

    Yes, obviously. We're talking about something people do. The conversation we're having now is like someone posting a sermon saying that drunkenness is a sin, and someone brilliant sophist pipes up and says, "Not necessarily! If you were a sailor on a 17th man-of-war and your leg got shredded by a load of grapeshot and needed to be sawed off with a hacksaw, you would be given a huge amount of whisky by the ship's surgeon to make you pass out so you wouldn't go flying off the operating table when he started sawing off your leg. Therefore it is not true to say that drunkenness is always a sin." Okay boomer. :laugh1:


    Offline ServusInutilisDomini

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 529
    • Reputation: +249/-87
    • Gender: Male
    • O sacrum convivum... https://youtu.be/-WCicnX6pN8
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #16 on: October 06, 2022, 10:45:16 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The ones i just mentioned in the bible quotes.

    Furthermore, there is no dance that is sinful. This is a form of gnosticism to say so for it conflates concupiscence with the object. Its akin to saying sex is a sin, or beauty is a sin or women are a sin for they can all lead to concupiscence.
    This accusation of gnosticism has grown quite fashionable these days.

    Do you perchance dance occasionally?


    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2133
    • Reputation: +1330/-87
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #17 on: October 06, 2022, 11:04:32 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Until someone actually cites the papal teaching to show the actual nuance about what type of dancing, this discussion is mere navel gazing.
    Papal teachings rarely get that nuanced; they usually provide the principals to follow. Otherwise, you will get people that says, "Look the Pope has specifically condemn X, Y, and Z but he never said anything about Q, so therefore we can do Q!"

    That is why the Catechism quoted in the previous article states:
    We consider it to be our duty to warn our people against those amusements which may easily become to them an occasion of sin, and especially against those fashionable dances, which... are fraught with the greatest dangers to morals.”

    Thus, you must ask yourself if the amusement or dance you are considering partaking in:
    1. may easily become to them an occasion of sin
    2. fashionable dance that is fraught with the greatest dangers to morals.

    If yes, then it is sinful; if no, then go ahead provided it does not violate another moral principal.

    Offline Sefa

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 107
    • Reputation: +94/-26
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #18 on: October 06, 2022, 11:16:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .
    It is a sin to put oneself in the occasion of sin. Dances are an occasion of sin. This is not gnosticism, but simple Catholic morals.


    Tell that to all the saints quoted in the article above, as well as the Holy Office. They said dancing is a sin. They didn't say sex is a sin, or that being beautiful is a sin, or that being a woman is a sin.
    Dances are not an occasion of sin nor a sin. Otherwise you make David, God, Mary sister of aaron, holy virgins of the OT to be sinners. Tell that to all the saints quoted above from the bible, whom you convenient ignored. They trump some dubious article with no provenance written by some random self appointed lay teacher who people now flock to with itching ears to find the next juicy scandal to condemn to enliven their dull but "pious" lives.

    Still no one has provided the papal text.

    Offline Sefa

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 107
    • Reputation: +94/-26
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #19 on: October 06, 2022, 11:18:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This accusation of gnosticism has grown quite fashionable these days.

    Do you perchance dance occasionally?
    Oh just weddings and funerals...


    Offline Sefa

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 107
    • Reputation: +94/-26
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #20 on: October 06, 2022, 11:43:05 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • This accusation of gnosticism has grown quite fashionable these days.

    Do you perchance dance occasionally?
    And puritanism is becoming quite fashionable these days too

    Offline Sefa

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 107
    • Reputation: +94/-26
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #21 on: October 06, 2022, 11:52:20 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    Yes, obviously. We're talking about something people do. The conversation we're having now is like someone posting a sermon saying that drunkenness is a sin, and someone brilliant sophist pipes up and says, "Not necessarily! If you were a sailor on a 17th man-of-war and your leg got shredded by a load of grapeshot and needed to be sawed off with a hacksaw, you would be given a huge amount of whisky by the ship's surgeon to make you pass out so you wouldn't go flying off the operating table when he started sawing off your leg. Therefore it is not true to say that drunkenness is always a sin." Okay boomer. :laugh1:
    A true equivalence would be if someone said drinking alcohol is a sin in itself.

    I saw a toddler dancing to music and the parents said they didnt teach her that she just does it naturally. Was she sinning?
     
    Funny how you pretend to be very pious and contra "modern fashions" on a naturally and supernaturally affirmed good thing which the OT saints did, and yet you use the modern fashionable maxim of "ok Boomer". Seems like you just want to pick and choose whatever modern fashion suits your own will.

    Btw i'm not a boomer.

    Offline ServusInutilisDomini

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 529
    • Reputation: +249/-87
    • Gender: Male
    • O sacrum convivum... https://youtu.be/-WCicnX6pN8
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #22 on: October 06, 2022, 02:45:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Dances are not an occasion of sin nor a sin. Otherwise you make David, God, Mary sister of aaron, holy virgins of the OT to be sinners. Tell that to all the saints quoted above from the bible, whom you convenient ignored. They trump some dubious article with no provenance written by some random self appointed lay teacher who people now flock to with itching ears to find the next juicy scandal to condemn to enliven their dull but "pious" lives.

    Still no one has provided the papal text.
    Where does it say any of these engaged in dances with a member of the opposite sex?

    And I think the OT people were held to a lower standard than us. If you read the Bible, you will see the OT just are much less impressive than New Covenant saints.


    Offline Sefa

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 107
    • Reputation: +94/-26
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #23 on: October 06, 2022, 03:01:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Where does it say any of these engaged in dances with a member of the opposite sex?

    And I think the OT people were held to a lower standard than us. If you read the Bible, you will see the OT just are much less impressive than New Covenant saints.
    Irrelevant to the condemnation that all dancing is a sin. But all the examples depict men and women dancing in the presence of each other if it doesn't explicitly say they danced with each other.

    God positively affirmed their dancing, "virgins shall dance" and never condemned them for it. You can't just handwave it away by saying well the OT saints weren't as holy as us, for like the pharisees we take on new traditions of men to become even purer: this random article says we are pure for condemning dancing (nothing to do with my two left feet and hating fun)! And even the Jєωs and puritans and mohamedans don't dance with women so we can't be outdone by them!

    John the baptist was an OT saint and "among those born of women there is none greater than him" as Christ said, i think ranking 3rd in the glory of the saints just after st michael according to the confiteor. The OT saints are far more impressive than armchair moralists who have 0 authority to teach much less condemn.

    And as the catholic moral maxim goes: where there is doubt, there is freedom.

    Offline praesul

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 36
    • Reputation: +25/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #24 on: October 07, 2022, 03:31:03 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    And even when dancing alone, a woman could make herself a temptation, and yet part of that might be due to her attractiveness and her grace/athleticism, where a less attractive woman who's out of shape migth cause no occasion of sin.
    That made me chuckle. 

    "Adversity is the touchstone of friendship" ~ French Proverb

    '"Prefer nothing to the work of God"  ~ St. Benedict 

    Offline praesul

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 36
    • Reputation: +25/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #25 on: October 07, 2022, 03:59:50 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • ... To me it speaks to a certain frivolity, and the motions of the body seem to draw one's mind and nature down toward the carnal, the animal, and the material world...
    Careful, this sentiment that seems to be expressed in your quote above is getting close to what is expressed in Gnosticism. Spiritual = good  Material = Bad. 

    Although I am right there with you on avoiding animalistic behavior like dancing like some tranced out voodoo priests, We do not want to drift into the thought that the material world is bad. It is, after all part of the created order which is fundamentally good. That doesn't mean I think it is ok for our daughters to be twerking on Saturday night in the club, but you get my point. We can have a celebration and have non sinful fun with one another here in this world. After all, the very first miracle was when Our Blessed Lord provided extra wine for the wedding feast when all the wine was consumed by the participants. That could be called "frivolous" by some. 




    "Adversity is the touchstone of friendship" ~ French Proverb

    '"Prefer nothing to the work of God"  ~ St. Benedict 


    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2707
    • Reputation: +1548/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #26 on: October 07, 2022, 06:34:49 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Saint Francis de Sales wrote a great chapter on dancing in his book Introduction to the Devout Life:

    ***

    "St. Francis de Sales On Dancing

    Taken From - Introduction to the Devout Life, Part III. Ch.33



    In themselves, dances and balls are indifferent things. However, in actual practice they tend strongly toward the side of evil, and therefore are dangerous.

    People dance at night, and in darkened rooms. This favors certain familiarities. People stay up late and this results in their rising late the next day, causing the morning to be wasted. Consequently, they miss opportunities of serving God. Is it not foolish to turn night into day and day into night and to replace useful work with frivolous pleasure? Finally, at balls everyone tries to outdo everybody else in vanity, and vanity is favorable to the evil affections and dangerous loves which dancing so easily spawns.

    Philothea, what physicians say about mushrooms or pumpkins I say about dances: The best of them are not worth much! However, if you must eat pumpkins, be careful how they are prepared, eat only a little of them, and that rarely. In the same way, if you cannot give up going to balls, be careful how you dance, doing so with modesty, dignity and the right intention. Attend balls rarely, because no matter how carefully you conduct yourself at them, there is danger of excess in them, by becoming too attached to them.

    Because they are spongy, mushrooms are said to attract the surrounding rot. The same is true of balls and other such night-oriented gatherings. They usually attract sin: quarrels, jealousies, mockery; sensual loves. These activities open the pores of the heart to be poisoned by some loose word or some folly or some wanton glance of love. Yes, Philothea, such amusements are usually dangerous. They scatter one's spirit of devotion, weaken one's strength and chill one's charity. They awaken countless evil affections in the soul. Because of all this, use them with great caution.

    After eating mushrooms, one is advised above all to drink some good wine. I personally advise you to think some holy and good thoughts after a ball. These will counterbalance the bad impressions you may have received there.

    What are some such holy and good thoughts? While I was dancing, some people were burning in Hell for sins committed at dances or occasioned by their dancing. While I was dancing, monks, nuns and other fervent Christians were chanting God's praise and contemplating His beauty, thus using their time far more profitably than I was. While I was dancing, many souls departed from this world in great anguish; thousands were suffering dreadful pains in hospitals... While I was dancing; the time of my earthly life was hurrying by and death was approaching nearer. See how he mocks and invites me to his dance! In that dance I shall take but one step from this life to the next."
    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/

    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2707
    • Reputation: +1548/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #27 on: October 07, 2022, 06:41:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • From what I understand from having read various Saints and solid Catholic religious writers...

    1.  Dancing of itself it not necessarily a sin, but for most people can easily become an occasion of it.

    2.  If one is to dance, one should use appropriate dances.  (I remember hearing something before about Pope Pius X ridiculing the Tango and saying if people wanted to dance to do a innocent folk dance instead.). Among such better dances would probably fall British Contra Dancing, Old cινιℓ ωαr Dancing, and perhaps square dancing.  With such dances there is less physical contact and more grace elegance attached.

    3. Dancing should take place more during the daytime hours if it is allowed and in moderation.

    4.  Also, it is important to remember as of with playing cards and other things...  Everyone is different.  For some dancing may be more of an occasion of sin than for others.


    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/

    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2707
    • Reputation: +1548/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #28 on: October 07, 2022, 06:44:07 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is an example of dancing that we learned and taught growing up which is more refined than most modern dancing:



    If you are going to dance...do it right!  ;)
    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/

    Offline Sefa

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 107
    • Reputation: +94/-26
    • Gender: Male
    Re: The Papal Condemnation of Dances, 1916
    « Reply #29 on: October 07, 2022, 07:20:30 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Saint Francis de Sales wrote a great chapter on dancing in his book Introduction to the Devout Life:

    ***

    "St. Francis de Sales On Dancing

    Taken From - Introduction to the Devout Life, Part III. Ch.33



    In themselves, dances and balls are indifferent things. However, in actual practice they tend strongly toward the side of evil, and therefore are dangerous.

    People dance at night, and in darkened rooms. This favors certain familiarities. People stay up late and this results in their rising late the next day, causing the morning to be wasted. Consequently, they miss opportunities of serving God. Is it not foolish to turn night into day and day into night and to replace useful work with frivolous pleasure? Finally, at balls everyone tries to outdo everybody else in vanity, and vanity is favorable to the evil affections and dangerous loves which dancing so easily spawns.

    Philothea, what physicians say about mushrooms or pumpkins I say about dances: The best of them are not worth much! However, if you must eat pumpkins, be careful how they are prepared, eat only a little of them, and that rarely. In the same way, if you cannot give up going to balls, be careful how you dance, doing so with modesty, dignity and the right intention. Attend balls rarely, because no matter how carefully you conduct yourself at them, there is danger of excess in them, by becoming too attached to them.

    Because they are spongy, mushrooms are said to attract the surrounding rot. The same is true of balls and other such night-oriented gatherings. They usually attract sin: quarrels, jealousies, mockery; sensual loves. These activities open the pores of the heart to be poisoned by some loose word or some folly or some wanton glance of love. Yes, Philothea, such amusements are usually dangerous. They scatter one's spirit of devotion, weaken one's strength and chill one's charity. They awaken countless evil affections in the soul. Because of all this, use them with great caution.

    After eating mushrooms, one is advised above all to drink some good wine. I personally advise you to think some holy and good thoughts after a ball. These will counterbalance the bad impressions you may have received there.

    What are some such holy and good thoughts? While I was dancing, some people were burning in Hell for sins committed at dances or occasioned by their dancing. While I was dancing, monks, nuns and other fervent Christians were chanting God's praise and contemplating His beauty, thus using their time far more profitably than I was. While I was dancing, many souls departed from this world in great anguish; thousands were suffering dreadful pains in hospitals... While I was dancing; the time of my earthly life was hurrying by and death was approaching nearer. See how he mocks and invites me to his dance! In that dance I shall take but one step from this life to the next."
    Well thought out responses and teaching from a saint that dance itself is not a sin, therefore is a good thing but like all goods can be perverted by intention and circuмstances.

    The armchair moralists without authority should think before blanket condemning goods as sins and people as sinners for they set themselves up impossibly high standards for which Christ taught they will be judged for "judge not lest ye be judged".