It sounds like you can't have a Catholic "Super Bowl Party" -- unless the TV is going to be playing something other than the Super Bowl.  

Just having the event on your TV compromises your Catholicism -- how can you display such graphic ads, etc. publicly in front of your friends and kids, and not have it affect the purity of your Catholic Faith and morals?

When Did gαys Become Jєωs?


(left, 49'er Cornerback Chris Culliver forced to wear pink under the ruse of supporting breast cancer research.)

Last week, a football player was forced
to make an abject apology for expressing
distaste for ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity in the locker room.
When will heterosɛҳuąƖs have human rights?

"We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order."  Protocols of the Elders of Zion (16)


by Henry Makow Ph.D.

When did gαys become God's Chosen People?

When did ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs get "rights" but heterosɛҳuąƖs lose theirs?

Since Illuminati Satanists stepped up their campaign to undermine heterosɛҳuąƖ society, that's when.

This heterophobic campaign has reached the last redoubt of masculinity, NFL football. In the run-up to the Super Bowl Sunday, a controversy broke out when 49'er cornerback Chris Culliver Tuesday expressed discomfort with having ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs in the locker room as teammates.  


"I don't do the gαy guys man," said Culliver. "I don't do that. No, we don't got no gαy people on the team, they gotta get up out of here if they do. Can't be with that sweet stuff. Nah...can't be...in the locker room man. Nah."

Team management immediately distanced themselves from Culliver's controversial comments, releasing a statement Wednesday. "The San Francisco 49ers reject the comments that were made yesterday, and have addressed the matter with Chris," the statement read. "There is no place for discrimination within our organization at any level. We have and always will proudly support the LGBT community."

For his part, Culliver issued his own statement of apology via the team office late Wednesday:

"The derogatory comments I made yesterday were a reflection of thoughts in my head, but they are not how I feel. It has taken me seeing them in print to realize that they are hurtful and ugly. Those discriminating feelings are truly not in my heart. Further, I apologize to those who I have hurt and offended, and I pledge to learn and grow from this experience."

     
LET'S BE VERY CLEAR

"gαy rights" is a ruse to disguise the real Illuminati agenda: Replace heterosɛҳuąƖ norms (monogamy, marriage, children, family) with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ norms (lifelong sɛҳuąƖ promiscuity.)

The Illuminati are Satanists. Satanists declare what is sick to be healthy and vice versa.

I am NOT a "homophobe." This is a hateful smear typical of the Illuminati.

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a developmental disorder. Many ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs agree. I do not believe in persecuting or being unkind to people who suffer from it.

The real issue is social engineering. HeterosɛҳuąƖs in effect are being told that to resist ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ overtures is to be a "bigot."

 This hateful, disingenuous psychological attack on society is shameful and repugnant.

Yet it is being led by government and mass media who have gone over to the Dark Side.

Our schools are grooming our children for ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ activity. This is taking place under the guise of "bullying."

Parents should be storming the school board and legislature. Are they so stupid?

I don't care what ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs do in private. Most heterosɛҳuąƖs don't. But this isn't about gαy rights; it is about re-engineering humanity for the creation of a world police state.

The Illuminati faked the Sandy Hook school massacre as an pretext for gun control. How dare they demand sweeping legislation without displaying bodies and releasing surveillance tapes? Children may have died but Adam Lanza didn't do it. This reeks as bad as 9-11.

Mainstreaming ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity emasculates society as much as taking away assault rifles. It should be fought with as much vigor. The same applies to women in combat roles.

Why do people have so much trouble finding their "identity" these days?

Because identity is based on race, religion (God); nation and family (gender) -- all of which are being systematically undermined by the Illuminati. "We will undermine every collective identity except our own," they say in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.  

To have a healthy identity, we first have to establish ourselves as men and women. Then, usually as husbands and wives, and mothers and fathers.

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs don't know what gender they are.  Thus they are foisted on society as a model by our traitorous heterophobic politicians and mass media.  


CONCLUSION


HeterosɛҳuąƖs have as much right to express their distaste for  ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ activity as ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs have a right to engage in it. Chris Culliver's human rights have been trampled on.

Most Straights are prepared to accept ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs so long as they are not required to accept or engage in their practises. This applies to football players as well.

The forcing of sickness on our children in public schools is a red flag.

Western society has been totally subverted by a satanic cult, the Illuminati, based on the Jєωιѕн Kabalah, and backed by the central banking cartel.

We are being inducted into this cult through the mass media and the education system.  

The "poor persecuted minority" meme is used to strip majorities of their rights, and enact "change."

Change always is negative because Satanists have taken charge.

Quote from: PaulLuke

Did anyone else watch it? The Baltimore kicker Justin Tucker was making the sign of the cross before every play he was in, which was a nice touch. But that was dwarfed by the incredibly explicit and pagan commercials. I was surprised by how many commercials had a blatant sɛҳuąƖ tone to them, and many had underlying sɛҳuąƖ suggestiveness or other bits of heathenism. And don't get me started on the half time show. I thought I would see what it was all about, but I walked out once Beyonce walked out half naked and gyrating all over the place. Truly sickening. I got the feeling from that little bit (and from what others said about it) that it was basically a stripper show.

Kyrie eleison.

I don't think it is a nice touch.  It trivializes the Sign of the Cross.  God does not cre who wins a football game.

I watched the Super Bowl with family last year.  We muted the sound during commercials and turned the TV off during the half time show.  It still seemed like such a celebration of banal idolatry that I decided to ignore it completely this year.  Well that, and I didn't care at all about either team.

 :wink:

Nonsense, this is pride. One should ask God's assistance and blessing in all things, and likewise thank and bless Him for all victories, no matter how trivial they may seem to human eyes.

I did not watch anything.  I knew there was going to be foul commercials, so I didn't watch anything.  Years ago the commercials were funny; it isn't funny anymore!!

Sigismund's comment should be a separate thread.  

Sigs, God does too care about football games and every single soul involved!!!

God cares about their souls, certainly, and so do I.  I see no reason to think He cares whether some guy makes a touch down.

And given the decadence that attends the super bowl, the best thing the athlete's can do for their souls is to stay away from it.

Quote from: Dellery

Quote from: Sigismund

Quote from: PaulLuke

Did anyone else watch it? The Baltimore kicker Justin Tucker was making the sign of the cross before every play he was in, which was a nice touch. But that was dwarfed by the incredibly explicit and pagan commercials. I was surprised by how many commercials had a blatant sɛҳuąƖ tone to them, and many had underlying sɛҳuąƖ suggestiveness or other bits of heathenism. And don't get me started on the half time show. I thought I would see what it was all about, but I walked out once Beyonce walked out half naked and gyrating all over the place. Truly sickening. I got the feeling from that little bit (and from what others said about it) that it was basically a stripper show.

Kyrie eleison.

I don't think it is a nice touch.  It trivializes the Sign of the Cross.  God does not cre who wins a football game.

I watched the Super Bowl with family last year.  We muted the sound during commercials and turned the TV off during the half time show.  It still seemed like such a celebration of banal idolatry that I decided to ignore it completely this year.  Well that, and I didn't care at all about either team.

 :wink:

Nonsense, this is pride. One should ask God's assistance and blessing in all things, and likewise thank and bless Him for all victories, no matter how trivial they may seem to human eyes.

Do you actually believe there is s ome way to induce the Lord God Almighty, the Creator of the universe, to take sides in a football game?  Well, have at it, I suppose.   :rolleyes:

I think maybe we're a little misunderstood, I never implied God takes sides in football games. The act of supplication and or thanksgiving, by making the sign of the cross before a play, in this case a field-goal, is what you were originally objecting to. The football player in question was making an act of humility, by beseeching God to help him do his job, acknowledging nothing on earth, no matter how small, can be accomplished in His absence. To suggest that one must reserve crossing themselves only for occasions judged worthy by human reason, is prideful, plain and simple.