Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Story of Pilate's wife telling her husband Jesus was innocent  (Read 1780 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cassini

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3978
  • Reputation: +3209/-275
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Mysteries of the Bible: What Did Pilate’s Wife Dream? (Remnant Newspaper)

    Being a pagan, Pilate’s wife conceives of the Savior’s sacrifice on the Cross in terms of comparison with one of the gods known to the Romans, a thought which clearly fills her with astonishment. In a dream she "suffered many things" becuase Pilate was condemning Jesus to death. What, then, did she dream?

    The tumult was growing. Caught as if in an inescapable trap between Roman law and the murderous fanaticism of those who wanted to see Jesus the Nazarene dead, Pilate does everything he can to save the unusual accused man. Eager to avoid the dangerously escalating unrest—whose crescendo was easily perceptible—he behaves like a diplomat incapable of heroism. He uses every trick, including the tradition of releasing a prisoner on a holiday. He hopes the crowd will choose Jesus. Without knowing why, he is disturbed by this silent accused man, who, when he does speak, touches Pilate’s mind and heart as if he could see through him. Despite his hopes, the envy of the accusers is implacable (“For he knew that for envy they had delivered him”– Matthew 27:18).

    In the midst of the discussions, as if his own inner turmoil were not enough, he receives a message from his wife. Called Claudia by some traditions, and Procula by others, she sends him a note that Pilate, feverish, reads pensively in the judgment seat. The lines from his consort make him frown even more deeply:

    “Have thou nothing to do with that just man; for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.” (“Nihil tibi, et justo illi : multa enim passa sum hodie per visum propter eum.”–Matthew 27:19)

    Looking at the turmoil around him as if it were an unbelievable dream, he remains silent as he sees the faces of the accusers twisted by hatred. The Dutch master Hieronymus Bosch would later depict them so vividly in his paintings. After a few minutes of restless reflection, he tries once more to save Jesus, proposing His release under the generous custom of summer clemency. Stubborn, blind, with hearts of stone, the accusers press on to the end. The uproar grows louder and louder. Cowardly and lacking in heroism, Pilate chooses the comfort of convenience over manliness: he washes his hands, releases a scoundrel, and accepts instead the death sentence of our Lord, Jesus Christ. Not even his wife’s warning could make him act like a true Roman. What followed, we know. Yet the question remains: what did Pilate’s wife dream?

    Without claiming that the veil of mystery can be lifted, what remains for us is a beautiful, imaginative meditation on one of the mysteries in the lives of those who were direct witnesses to the most important event in all of fallen humanity’s history: the Passion and Death of the King of Kings, Jesus Christ.

    First, let us note the nuance introduced in Saint Jerome’s Vulgate: the Greek original word ὄναρ (ónar = dream) is translated as visum (= vision). So not just an ordinary dream, but a vision like the one through which the angel warned Saint Joseph to flee with the divine child and the Holy Virgin Mary to Egypt. Saint Jerome also comments that God granted such a vision to pagan spouses because “the confession of Pilate and his wife that the Lord was innocent is a testimony of the Gentile people.”[1]

    As for the source of the vision, the saints offer conflicting interpretations. Some believe that Pilate’s wife’s dream was caused by a malevolent angel—a demon. Among the supporters of this interpretation is the Blessed Benedictine monk Rabanus Maurus Magnentius (c.780–856). Here is what he tells us:

    “The devil now at last understanding that he should lose his trophies through Christ, as he had at the first brought in death by a woman, so by a woman he would deliver Christ out of the hands of His enemies, lest through His death he should lose the sovereignty of death.”

    Just as the devil brought death into the world after Eve obeyed the serpent, now—through another Eve—he seeks to thwart the plan of the Divine Savior to redeem humanity through His sacrifice on the Cross. The list of those who share Rabanus’s interpretation is impressive, including Saint Cyprian of Carthage (c. 210–258) and the legendary Doctor Mellifluus, Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153). However, the list of those who believe that the angel who caused Pilate’s wife’s dream or vision was a good one is even more impressive: it includes Origen (c.185–c.253), and Saints Hilary of Poitiers (c.310–c.367), John Chrysostom (c. 347–407), Ambrose of Milan (c.339–397), and his brilliant student, Augustine (354–430). Suggesting the positive origin of the dream, Origen speaks in his commentary of the work of Divine Providence, which desired, in fact, nothing less than the conversion of Pilate’s wife:

    “The Evangelist did not overlook the matter of divine providence regarding the praise of God, who desired to convert Pilate’s wife in a dream. The woman took it upon herself to prevent her husband from passing sentence against Jesus.”[2]

    From this arose the Eastern traditions which, with great exaltation, came to regard Claudia Procula as a saint. Interesting is the interpretation of the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas, who unifies the two views—thus avoiding any criticism of the saints previously mentioned—through an elegant commentary:

    “As regards this vision, we can say that it was caused by God through good angels; or by the devil, who was bent on preventing the passion: for in the passion there was the sin of murder. And in this way it came through good angels; but a good fruit comes out of the passion, so the devil, already perceiving that he was God, and afraid of losing power through the passion, just as he had put it in the mind of Judas to betray him, so also now he wished to prevent it, not because he wanted to prevent the sin, but rather to prevent the fruit of the passion.”[3]

    Although not as elegant, the famous 17th-century Jesuit commentator Cornelius a Lapide (1567–1637) stated that it is “more correctly” to assume that Pilate’s wife’s dream was the result of intervention by a holy angel.[4] Despite all these commentaries, the actual content of Pilate’s wife’s dream remains unknown to us. It seems that only poets and writers can attempt to offer a plausible version—without ever being able to claim they have unraveled the mystery.

    The fact that she perceives the historical figure of Jesus of Nazareth in such terms shows us that she had already surpassed the pagan understanding of her fellow Romans. Though not necessarily a saint, she was on the path to conversion.

    One of the most gifted modern English-speaking writers, Dorothy Leigh Sayers (1893–1957), imagines such a version in her radio play The Man Born to Be King. Written between 1940–1941, the play was broadcast in episodes on BBC Radio from December 21, 1941, to October 18, 1942. Here, in the 6th sequence of the Second Scene (Calvary Hill), Pilate asks his wife about the content of the dream. Though purely fictional, the response imagined by the English author is truly remarkable:

    “Claudia: I was in a ship at sea, voyaging among the islands of the Aegean. At first the weather seemed calm and sunny—but presently, the sky darkened—and the sea began to toss with the wind. . . .

    (Wind and waves)

    Then, out of the east, there came a cry, strange and piercing…

    (Voice, in a thin wail: “Pan ho megas tethnke - Pan ho megas tethnke-”)

    …and I said to die captain, ‘What do they cry?’ And he answered, ‘Great Pan is dead.’ And I asked him, ‘How can God die?’ And he answered, ‘Don’t you remember? They crucified him. He suffered under Pontius Pilate’ . . .

    (Murmur of voices, starting almost in a whisper)

    …then all the people in the ship turned their faces to me and said: ‘Pontius Pilate’…

    (Voices, some speaking, some chanting, some muttering, mingled with sung fragments of Greek and Latin liturgies, weaving and crossing one another: ‘Pontius Pilate… Pontius Pilate… he suffered under Pontius Pilate… crucified, dead and buried… sub Pontio Pilato… Pilato… he suffered… suffered… under Pontius Pilate… under Pontius Pilate…)

    ... in all tongues and all voices …even the little children with their mothers...

    (Children's voices: ‘Suffered under Pontius Pilate… sub Pontio Pilato… crucifix sous Ponce Pilate… gekreuzigt unter Pontius Pilatus… and other languages, mingling with the adult voices: then fade it all out)

    …your name, husband, your name continually—‘he suffered under Pontius Pilate’.”[5]

    Being a pagan, Pilate’s wife can only conceive of the Savior’s sacrifice on the Cross in terms of comparison with one of the gods known to the Romans. Yet even so, the sheer thought of the death of a god clearly fills her with astonishment. The fact that she perceives the historical figure of Jesus of Nazareth in such terms shows us that she had already surpassed the pagan understanding of her fellow Romans. Though not necessarily a saint, she was on the path to conversion.

    This is how Dorothy Leigh Sayers resolved the mystery of Pilate’s wife’s dream. Without claiming that the veil of mystery can be lifted, what remains for us is a beautiful, imaginative meditation on one of the mysteries in the lives of those who were direct witnesses to the most important event in all of fallen humanity’s history: the Passion and Death of the King of Kings, Jesus Christ.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47326
    • Reputation: +28016/-5233
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Story of Pilate's wife telling her husband Jesus was innocent
    « Reply #1 on: April 18, 2025, 08:38:31 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • First, let us note the nuance introduced in Saint Jerome’s Vulgate: the Greek original word ὄναρ (ónar = dream) is translated as visum (= vision). So not just an ordinary dream, but a vision like the one through which the angel warned Saint Joseph to flee with the divine child and the Holy Virgin Mary to Egypt. Saint Jerome also comments that God granted such a vision to pagan spouses because “the confession of Pilate and his wife that the Lord was innocent is a testimony of the Gentile people.”

    Thanks, cassini.  Great story.  Do you have a link?

    So, just as a quick comment ont he above, I've long argued that when St. Joseph had his "dreams" ... these were not dreams and should in fact be translated as visions.  St. Joseph didn't just fall asleep, have some dream that COULD have just been his subconscience or imagination, and pick up his entire family and flee to Egypt.  For lack of a better or different word than dream, the term dream in a broader sense can refer to having sensory experiences outside of normal consciousness in the real world, i.e. could very well be a vision.  St. Joseph received visions and private revelations and did not simply have "dreams".  That translation into English needs to be changed.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47326
    • Reputation: +28016/-5233
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Story of Pilate's wife telling her husband Jesus was innocent
    « Reply #2 on: April 18, 2025, 08:48:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Now, the question of whether the dream came throught he (direct) agency of a demon or an angel is interesting, and yet at the end of the day, God permits the activities of the evils spirits, so much so that in the Old Testament, in many locations, it describes God as sending these evil spirits to try various holy people.  So even if the evil spirit did it, God allowed it, so that it was God's will either way.  Understood in that sense, this was done so that Pilate would stand up to the Jews and affirm his innocence, and even (out of spite) His Kingship (with the INRI plack).  Perhaps had his wife not encouraged him, he wouldn't have even gone that far and would would not have his testimony as we find it in Sacred Scripture.

    So, did the devil motivate Judas?  That's another question.  If the devil knew (and sure he should have properly interpreted Our Lord's teaching to that effect) that His Crucifixion and Death would be the cause of breaking his power and the redemption of mankind, he would be trying to PREVENT it.  In fact, when St. Peter objected to Our Lord's prediction of His Passion, Our Lord says, "Get thee behind me, Satan" ... as if that objection had been motivated by Satan.

    I suspect that Judas did what he did out of his own evil motives and not by diabolical influence.  Recall that not every sin is motivated by the devil, since we also have "the world and the flesh", i.e. our own weakness and free will in Original Sin.  Now, while the devil knew what was going on, he was also probably smart enough to know that he could never thwart God's plan, so maybe his only goal was to take as many down in the process as he could.

    Overall, the devil certainly isn't stupid, and he must know that even when he's working his evil, he's actually doing God's will ... and I bet that is one of his greatest tortures.


    Offline Miseremini

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4726
    • Reputation: +3801/-321
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Story of Pilate's wife telling her husband Jesus was innocent
    « Reply #4 on: April 18, 2025, 01:39:57 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0


  • I suspect that Judas did what he did out of his own evil motives and not by diabolical influence.  Recall that not every sin is motivated by the devil, since we also have "the world and the flesh", i.e. our own weakness and free will in Original Sin.  Now, while the devil knew what was going on, he was also probably smart enough to know that he could never thwart God's plan, so maybe his only goal was to take as many down in the process as he could.

    Overall, the devil certainly isn't stupid, and he must know that even when he's working his evil, he's actually doing God's will ... and I bet that is one of his greatest tortures.
    While it is true the devil is very smart he's neither always knowledgeable nor privy to God's plans.

    The priests and nuns always taught us that the devil thought Jesus was a new prophet and that's why he tempted Him in the desert, trying to uncover His identity and purpose.  They further taught that the devil inspired Judas to get rid of this new Holy Man, after all who better that one so filled with pride.

    It was only at the crucifixion that it was revealed to the devil that Jesus was The Redeemer and His mission had been accomplished which totally enraged the devil in his defeat.

    Watching Mel's "Passion" you will see this theory played out, so perhaps it came from Anne Catherine Emmerich.  It's a definite possibility.  I see no reason God would make the devil privy to His plans.
    I also remember reading somewhere, that our Blessed Mother chained the devil to the foot of the Cross so he couldn't escape from his defeat.
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]



    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47326
    • Reputation: +28016/-5233
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Story of Pilate's wife telling her husband Jesus was innocent
    « Reply #5 on: April 18, 2025, 02:17:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • While it is true the devil is very smart he's neither always knowledgeable nor privy to God's plans.

    Sure, but he could easily figure it out, even if the Apostles didn't.  Our Lord clearly told the Apostles what was going to happen, as did the OT Scriptures that the devil could easily interpret.

    While the devil hates Jesus, he figured out pretty quickly Who He was and what was going to happen and believed (though not by supernatural faith) in Him.  He could easily tied together all the Scriptures about the blood sacrifice in atonement for sin, the very same things whereby the Jews should also have recognized the Messiah.

    By that time the devil knew full well Who Our Lord was and what He was going to do.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47326
    • Reputation: +28016/-5233
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Story of Pilate's wife telling her husband Jesus was innocent
    « Reply #6 on: April 18, 2025, 02:19:15 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • It was only at the crucifixion that it was revealed to the devil that Jesus was The Redeemer and His mission had been accomplished which totally enraged the devil in his defeat.

    Watching Mel's "Passion" you will see this theory played out ...

    No.  Jesus Himself laid it all out, many times, as did the OT Scriptures Who He was.  Let's not use Gibson's movie to draw theological conclusions.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47326
    • Reputation: +28016/-5233
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Story of Pilate's wife telling her husband Jesus was innocent
    « Reply #7 on: April 18, 2025, 02:21:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I see no reason God would make the devil privy to His plans.

    His "plans" were foretold quite clearly in the Sacred Scriptures and that's why the Jews were culpable for rejecting Him as the Messiah, and on top of it Jesus often publicly declared His plans very clearly ... even if the Apostles tuned it out beause they didn't want to hear it.


    Offline Miseremini

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4726
    • Reputation: +3801/-321
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Story of Pilate's wife telling her husband Jesus was innocent
    « Reply #8 on: April 18, 2025, 03:02:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • His "plans" were foretold quite clearly in the Sacred Scriptures and that's why the Jews were culpable for rejecting Him as the Messiah, and on top of it Jesus often publicly declared His plans very clearly ... even if the Apostles tuned it out beause they didn't want to hear it.
    You make it sound as if Christ gave the apostles an itinerary.
    Maybe  you know what the devil thinks/knows but no where in the OT does it give the time/date of the Redeemer.  The people even asked John the Baptist if he were the Messiah
    The devil was waiting just like the people.  He could only figure it out if God allowed him to.

    And I wasn't holding up the movie as any proof...only commenting on it must have come from Emmerich.  Stop twisting things.

    No.  Jesus Himself laid it all out, many times, as did the OT Scriptures Who He was.  Let's not use Gibson's movie to draw theological conclusions.
    OT Scripture laid out a description of the Redeemer.  It never said who He was.
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]