Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Statistics - Who reads books anymore?  (Read 3368 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31196
  • Reputation: +27113/-494
  • Gender: Male
Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
« on: November 30, 2012, 10:24:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Who Reads Books?

    “If anyone reads books, it’s probably you guys. But according to some recently-gathered (and frankly startling) statistics, you’re a dying breed. To wit:

    • One-third of high school graduates never read another book for the rest of their lives.
    • 42 percent of college graduates never read another book after college.
    • 80 percent of U.S. families did not buy or read a book last year.
    • 70 percent of U.S. adults have not been in a bookstore in the last five years.
    • 57 percent of new books are not read to completion.”

    Some startling statistics
    by Robyn Jackson

    “The following statistics about book publishing and reading were found on www.parapub.com, the Web site of self-publishing guru Dan Poynter. They’ll give you an idea of what you’re up against if you want to write books for a living.

    1/3 of high school graduates never read another book for the rest of their lives.
    42 percent of college graduates never read another book after college.
    80 percent of U.S. families did not buy or read a book last year.
    70 percent of U.S. adults have not been in a bookstore in the last five years.
    57 percent of new books are not read to completion.
    70 percent of books published do not earn back their advance.
    70 percent of the books published do not make a profit.
    (Source: Jerold Jenkins, www.JenkinsGroupInc.com)

    53 percent read fiction, 43 percent read nonfiction. The favorite fiction category is mystery and suspense, at 19 percent.
    55 percent of fiction is bought by women, 45 percent by men.
    (Source: Publishers Weekly)

    About 120,000 books are published each year in the U.S.
    (Source: www.bookwire.com)

    A successful fiction book sells 5,000 copies.
    A successful nonfiction book sells 7,500 copies.
    (Source: Authors Guild, www.authorsguild.org)

    On average, a bookstore browser spends 8 seconds looking at a book’s front cover and 15 seconds looking at the back cover.
    (Source: Para Publishing, www.parapub.com)

    Each day in the U.S., people spend 4 hours watching TV, 3 hours listening to the radio and 14 minutes reading magazines.
    (Source: Veronis, Suhler & Associates investment banker)”

    Good thing you can read more than books at the library!
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Cronier

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 48
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #1 on: November 30, 2012, 11:14:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wow! Those are shocking statistics!  Thank you for posting this.  I could not live without books and reading.  


    Offline Sigismund

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5386
    • Reputation: +3121/-44
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #2 on: December 01, 2012, 10:28:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Matthew,

    Well thanks for thoroughly depressing me.  On the upside, I guess I can feel really special now whenever I open a book.
    Stir up within Thy Church, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the Spirit with which blessed Josaphat, Thy Martyr and Bishop, was filled, when he laid down his life for his sheep: so that, through his intercession, we too may be moved and strengthen by the same Spir

    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3473
    • Reputation: +1816/-233
    • Gender: Female
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #3 on: December 01, 2012, 10:40:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wonder who was polled to come up with these figures and how socioeconomic, age and geographic factors figure in to these statistics?

    People may not be able to afford to buy books at $15 a pop but judging by how busy our library is I think more than 20% of the population is reading books.

    But I have no doubt that people spend more time watching TV than reading judging from the blue light I see seeping out windows when I go for my evening walk!

    Marsha

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #4 on: December 02, 2012, 12:11:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Whoah that's sad, but not surprising. It is part of a national tragedy that no one reads anymore.


    Offline Hobbledehoy

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3746
    • Reputation: +4806/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #5 on: December 03, 2012, 06:00:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This explains everything: from the ascendancy of a socialist regime tyrannizing the American Republic with artificially construed political agendas imposed upon the dying middle class by leftist elitists who surpass Lenin and Mao in their cloaked machinations, to the fact that most people need flashing lights and shiny things to get their attention nowadays.

    In such a hyper-textualized age as ours never before have people been so unlettered and brainwashed as now: easy prey for the power that be.

    These are the true "Dark Ages."
    Please ignore all that I have written regarding sedevacantism.

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #6 on: December 04, 2012, 06:57:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think comparing Obama to Lenin and Mao is going too far. As bad as Obama is, he's never starved or murdered anybody. At least I can agree with Obama on some aspects of foreign policy, which is more than I can say for the GOP.

    Offline PerEvangelicaDicta

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2049
    • Reputation: +1285/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #7 on: December 04, 2012, 08:10:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    As bad as Obama is, he's never starved or murdered anybody.


    He is responsible for the brutal torture and murder of millions of the most innocent.


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #8 on: December 04, 2012, 08:55:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, I'm not surprised you would have a strong opinion on this topic, Hobbles.

    It is a unique contribution you make so selflessly to provide scans of your
    impressive collection.  They're from an age within living memory, but fading fast.

    We are truly given the grace to live in the generation of transition, when the old
    is forgotten and the new is all the rage.  What a world.  

    And for anyone who retains sentiments of attachment to the values of yesteryear,
    this current society is a very hostile place to live.  Our children meet it from day
    to day, everywhere they go.  The challenges they face to uphold Sacred Tradition
    and yet not be an outright enemy to everyone that would be their freind is a
    daunting burden to throw across their shoulders.  But we do it out of necessity.


    Quote from: Hobbledehoy
    This explains everything: from the ascendancy of a socialist regime tyrannizing the American Republic with artificially construed political agendas imposed upon the dying middle class by leftist elitists who surpass Lenin and Mao in their cloaked machinations, to the fact that most people need flashing lights and shiny things to get their attention nowadays.

    In such a hyper-textualized age as ours never before have people been so unlettered and brainwashed as now: easy prey for the power that be.

    These are the true "Dark Ages."



    So true, so true.

    I had an acquaintance in 1993 or so, who was a Hollywood elite.  He was a man
    who ran the circuit of fancy parties putting ideas in the minds of writers.  Their
    careers demanded constant new ideas.  The "Industry" is a monster with a
    voracious appetite for everything new, as you can well imagine.

    So a guy like Ron Graham, whose personality was rather "off the wall" and high
    energy, was an ornament at parties that sprang to life new concepts and
    thoughts in the minds of his listeners, many of whom had to go home that
    night and stay up typing screenplays.  And they had better be "good" product
    or their careers were on the chopping block.  The competition is constantly
    nipping at your heels, so to speak.  No matter who falls down, there is someone
    new and up-and-coming who is ready, willing and able to take your place in
    a heartbeat.

    My acquaintance, Ron, told me that TV was going to transform our culture.  
    That this black box was going to be the key instrument of major societal
    evolution, and virtual reality would soon become more real in the minds of
    people than the conversation we are having right now, and he was really
    present, three feet in front of me.  He hob-nobbed with those who were in
    complete accord with this "infallible" dogma, this pretext of prosperity, this
    ticket to the "A" list in the books of the movers and shakers of
    Entertainment.

    Then I have another figure of more recent vintage.  She is in her dotage, but
    her working life was spent in Hollywood, in the offices of the movie stars in
    the 50's and 60's and 70's.  Her whole life is "entertainment."  She met all
    the stars, and knew their personal life details as if they were the saints of
    her religion.  And they were, really.  All of her social interaction was with
    friends who worshipped the false god of Entertainment, which translates in
    practical terms to TV now, because that's how you spend your Holy Hour
    in front of satan's tabernacle.


    But it's more than an hour.  People will spend ALL their available time, and some
    of the time they don't have, in front of the tabernacle of satan, the media
    box, the one and only Object of their Devoted Attention.  It is the source of
    their joys, fears, imagination, hopes, desires, passions, opinions, planning,
    diversion, consolation.  Everything.  

    And then along came CathInfo ...............  Just kidding.  :jester:

    But for what it's worth, this old lady never read to her children out loud.

    Now, reading aloud to children IMHO is one of the most important precepts
    of our culture and non-negotiables for our future.  

    That bears repeating.


    Reading aloud to children is one of the most important precepts

    of our culture and non-negotiables for our future.



    But this woman disdained books.  Her god (and she's Catholic BTW) is and
    always has been Entertainment.  I went to help her take care of her home
    because she was having trouble keeping up with the most basic things of
    life, and there was a time when all the chores were done and she needed
    to have someone there to call for help or whatever, so I had an hour to
    take a "break."  I had a lot of reading to do, so I had brought a book with
    me.  She sat nearby, and I offered to read to her, but she was not interested
    in hearing me read.  So I read to myself, silently.  She was beside herself.
    She could not stand the thought that someone was more interested in
    wasting their time on staring at a book instead of talking to her.  But we
    had already had a lot of conversation, and it was frankly going nowhere,
    because all she wants to talk about is movie stars, and I have absolutely
    no interest in the personal details of the lives of movie stars.  I had already
    told her all my stories about the several Icons of Hollywood whom I had
    known.  There was no more to say.  It was a topic that was a dead end
    to me.  I was more than willing to talk about religion, but she would have
    none of that.  So as I attempted to read to myself, she would sit there
    and ask me a question every 3 to 5 minutes:  "What are you reading?"
    "Is that a good book?"  "Have you read that book before?"  "Does your wife
    like to read?"  "Do you read by yourself in front of your wife?"  "Do you
    read like this at home, too?"  "Are you sure all the chores are done?"  
    "What time is my son coming home?"  

    I'm used to interruptions: I raised several children.  But it was not just the
    interruptions.  It was her objective to pick, pick, pick, until she got to
    something about you that she could accuse you of having done "wrong" in
    her estimation.  Some aspect of your life that she would have done
    differently if she were you.  She would ask personal questions, and in order
    to participate in her conversation, you would have to provide personal
    answers, or else you were not "cooperative" and "distant."  But her
    inordinate curiosity was a means for her to exercise her ad hominem
    arguments against you.  She was combative, belligerent, petty, and
    generally miserable.   And she could not stand the sight of someone
    daring to waste their time reading a book.

    When I asked her son about this, I was surprised to find out that not only
    had she never read to him as a child, but she was wont to turn the pages
    of a magazine and only look at the pictures.  Suddenly, I realized that
    when I had offered to him one of my favorite religious books, I think it
    was Preparation for Death by St. Alfonsus Maria de Liguori, Doctor
    of the Church, his first comment, flipping through the pages was, "But
    there are no pictures."  

    I thought he was joking, but no, he was most serious.

    This intellectual plague has a way of invading one's whole life.  One who
    suffers from this spiritual malady, when it comes to using an Internet
    computer for example, will be unable to avoid clicking on the image of
    every pretty girl he sees, if you know what I mean.  And then what
    do you do with all the viruses - the STDs of cyberspace?!

    Why, then you obviously have to go to the doctor and get a prescription!

    You call the Geek Squad, of course, and they find Trojans (horses?) hiding
    on your hard drive, like as a driver for your mouse pad.




    Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    I think comparing Obama to Lenin and Mao is going too far. As bad as Obama is, he's never starved or murdered anybody. At least I can agree with Obama on some aspects of foreign policy, which is more than I can say for the GOP.


    You don't seem to know much about the Windy City, where he's from.

    He managed to avoid all-out war for the first 4 years but now he has nothing
    to keep him from "letting it all hang out" for the next 4.  






    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline bowler

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3299
    • Reputation: +15/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #9 on: December 04, 2012, 09:44:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    Who Reads Books? ... .according to some recently-gathered ..statistics, you’re a dying breed. ..


    These stats are from only the USA. Other countries are reading.

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #10 on: December 04, 2012, 04:43:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PerEvangelicaDicta
    He is responsible for the brutal torture and murder of millions of the most innocent.


    I am not sure whether that is a reference to abortion or the drone attacks. Nevertheless I do agree, but if we are talking of actual torture in wartime harsh tactics must be used.


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #11 on: December 04, 2012, 05:36:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    I think comparing Obama to Lenin and Mao is going too far. As bad as Obama is, he's never starved or murdered anybody. At least I can agree with Obama on some aspects of foreign policy, which is more than I can say for the GOP.



    When I read your response, TG20, there wasn't much I could say at the
    time that would make any difference.  Besides, it would be off topic to do
    so.  Therefore I started a new thread with you in mind, and others here
    who may find it, shall we say, different, from what you're used to hearing
    on the MSM on the way to work or at 6:00 am EST or EDT in the summer.


    Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Quote from: PerEvangelicaDicta
    He is responsible for the brutal torture and murder of millions of the most innocent.


    I am not sure whether that is a reference to abortion or the drone attacks. Nevertheless I do agree, but if we are talking of actual torture in wartime harsh tactics must be used.


    Abortion is brutal torture.  Abortion is murder.  The execution of any
    abortion requires harsh tactics.  And there have been many millions of
    abortions.  There have been many, many times more abortions in the
    past single century than there have been brutal murders worldwide in
    the history of the human race.  Therefore, the legalized state of
    abortion is a state of war against the innocent pre-born children who
    have been sentenced to death by Obama, whom God judges for these
    deeds, "...and not only they that do them, but they also who consent to
    them that do them" (Rom. i. 32).

    Why is abortion "legal?"  Because, the "supreme court" doesn't know
    what a person is.  They can't tell the difference between a person
    and a problem.  When it's their turn to receive their own, particular
    judgment, I don't think I want to watch.  It will be horrible beyond
    measure.  Abortion is willful murder of the innocent, one of the four
    sins that cry to heaven for vengeance.  And the Lord says, "vengeance
    is mine."  

    They're ignorant of what a "person" is, but they, in their ignorance,
    interpret our "laws."

    And that, is called "justice."

    Kyrie eleison.







    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #12 on: December 04, 2012, 06:56:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Like I said I agree when it comes to abortion, but I was speaking of the harsh tactics of actual torture against adult human beings.

    Anyway I agree that Obama has been a horrible President and no Catholic could vote for a man who allows abortion, I was just talking about comparing him as the next Communist dictator.

    Offline Hobbledehoy

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3746
    • Reputation: +4806/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #13 on: December 04, 2012, 09:03:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    I think comparing Obama to Lenin and Mao is going too far. As bad as Obama is, he's never starved or murdered anybody. At least I can agree with Obama on some aspects of foreign policy, which is more than I can say for the GOP.


    In an interview I heard a long while ago, someone made a statement to the effect that Obama did not really change much in the field of foreign policy from Bush (this was on the eve of the Congressional elections in 2010): in fact, most things that Bush's administration installed were kept (Homeland, etc.), something for which the liberals chided Obama. If anything, Obama owes much to Bush regarding foreign policy, as both seem to keep spending money (that we don't have) on Israel and other things that are not in the interest of the American Republic.

    The comparison implied in my statement was not just with Obama but with the coterie of leftists who support him and were responsible for his political ascendancy and his cultural apotheosis amongst the "sheeple" (despite his dismal failures and abysmal mediocrity). It is not a perfect or absolute comparison (analogies, similes, metaphors, &c., never establish identity between the two constructs in question), so of course there are discrepancies.

    The comparison was particularly meant to elucidate upon the evolution of ideology that begins with Marx, goes through Lenin and Mao (who took Marxism and modified and implemented it as a logistically feasible polity and actually managed to built a political edifice thereupon). Obama, together with those who formed him and those whom he is forming, are the heirs of the Hegelian evolution of what Marx wrote, and what other misotheists and anthropocentists that preceeded Marx devised as an ideological rebellion against the teachings of right reason (Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, &c.) and those of Divine Revelation as preserved and taught by Holy Mother Church.

    As for the actual praxis of Obama's novel form of "Americanized" Marxist-Leninist ideology in not resulting in the persecutions such as those of Stalin and Mao, there is actually a persecution that is more subtle and that has resulted in discords amongst the classes and will eventually end in full-blow violence if things keep going the way they are: the cultural, political and fiscal rape and torture of the American middle class, and the disenfranchisement of the American workers, whereby thousands are subject to undue taxation and have to pay for the blunders of Washington, wherein elitist liberals who have no notion of what "real life" is outside their bubbly little worlds of celebrity fundraisers, talk-shows, &c. , do as they please.

    These people engorge themselves in the blood of the innocent (the billions of children murdered by de-crimininalized abortion) and the tears of those workers who are defrauded from their pay (the over-taxed American workers): these sins (and then there is the cultural and political institutionalization of sɛҳuąƖ aberration, known by the "sheeple" as "gαy rights") cry out to Heaven for vengeance.

    Obama is not Lenin or Mao, but he belongs to the same progeny: that of the "father of lies," the "prince of this world," whom the enemies of Christendom have enthroned, just as the deicide Jєωs preferred Barabbas to the divine Redeemer and formally assented to the reign of Caesar before Pilate on Good Friday.

    Quote from: Neil Obstat
    Well, I'm not surprised you would have a strong opinion on this topic, Hobbles.


    I'm a working man who is being told by rich leftist relatives how to feel and think regarding these matters, so yeah... I'm pretty ticked off when it comes to these issues.

    I just can't believe some people gasp and almost tear their hair off when I say things like, "Well, looks like the Mayans were right about the calendar thing, because you people just elected some slick, lying commie as President of the United States."
    Please ignore all that I have written regarding sedevacantism.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Statistics - Who reads books anymore?
    « Reply #14 on: December 05, 2012, 01:08:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Most admirable stuff, there, sir.  So much so I copied it wholesale into a new
    thread
    , FYI.



                                                Much obliged!   :cowboy:




    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.