« Reply #61 on: January 19, 2014, 11:03:03 PM »
0
0
You are a greater fool than I thought. Not only are you accusing me of something lewd that is untrue, you simultaneously admit that you can't prove it!
I'm not going to take too long on this topic since we are getting away from hairstyles on women but I do believe that an anonymous post was created regarding explicit acts, which you were the only one online at the time, and I believe AllMonks and Catholicism 101 called you, Mabel, and Ambrose out on a topic before you denounced them as puritanical.
Anyway, you know I missed the old days when women would actually give a damn about their appearance. These days women think hair and clothing is unimportant when it comes to going out with a man.
So now you "do believe?"
I don't see how you think you can initiate a libelous and absurd claim against me and think you can escape it by invoking the thread going off topic-- which is entirely the result of your libel!
I wholeheartedly deny your allegation, and you yourself admit that you never even saw me post it, and can offer nothing other than an "I do believe [some vague circuŠ¼stantial evidence*]"
Do you persist in your claim?
*when has there ever been only ONE person on CI? Good grief.
Mith,
I am also sorry that you have been calumniated. I have no clue why this guy brought me into this.
My problem with AllMonks and C101 were with their rejection of papal teaching on a moral matter. I stand by everything I said then and would say it again. To reject Pope Pius XII's teaching on the lawful use of the sterile times is matter for a mortal sin.
Logged
The Council of Trent, The Catechism of the Council of Trent, Papal Teaching, The Teaching of the Holy Office, The Teaching of the Church Fathers, The Code of Canon Law, Countless approved catechisms, The Doctors of the Church, The teaching of the Dogmatic
Topic: Sinful hair styles? (Read 8857 times)