Whatever one might think of buying the insurance, are you sure about the assertion that Silverstein bought the towers in August 2001 for $14 million?
That would be an awfully good price on the real estate alone, quite aside from the buildings.
Who is making this assertion, and where is their backup?
I don't know who runs that "Bitchute" channel. He may be referring to the wheeling and dealing they play up in secret ease with the lease ... the leasing arrangements, which would have involved the New York Port Authority and the Rockefellers, I guess. I think the Rockefellers were the builders of the Towers and had dibbs on the leasing games they play, and then there's the government pockets in the Port Authority too to deal with. How they cook the books and details and fine print in the arrangements on a spectacula' spooktakula' deal like 9-11!
14 million to grease the wheels and ante up maybe. 14 million for somethin' anyway ...
Someone who "knows what he's talking about", if that's true, explained to my brother one time how nobody in England really owns their homes or properties. He maintained everything's on a lease, it's all leased within a great net of leasing and people don't know it. They think they're buying homes and properties and owning them, but not really. Everything's on a great Egyptian pyramid leasing scheme and the Bank of England really owns everything, and holds it in some account for the Devil himself. Is that like a diabolical escrow account maybe? I don't know but it's the way they do the netting. It all gets captured in a mystical net of the abyss. Numbers may be attached like this or like that.
I think the USA may be somehwat affected by the same leviathan market scheming sort of thing. The point I took from Mr. "Bitchute" here is that Larry Silverstein was in on the scheme, got his cut, and is happy wit' dat. And no planes hit the Twin Towers, Building 7, or the Pentagon ...