Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Should your children associate with non-Catholics?  (Read 3046 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Should your children associate with non-Catholics?
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2009, 03:44:34 PM »
Hey, Parents for Truth, I think my oldest daughter is your daughters clone! Yes, it does make life interesting. Although in my case it is my mother who lives like a hippie. Funny thing though. My dd will tell me hundreds of times and hundreds of ways that I am off my rocker, but let anyone else do it and she fumes!

Should your children associate with non-Catholics?
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2009, 03:59:37 PM »
Quote from: kittycat496
Wait, Disney? Are you talking about the people that made Finding Nemo and Lady and the Tramp? I've never heard anything bad about them. Why don't you want kids watching them? I don't mean to sound rude I'm just curious because I watched them as a kid, I know many elementary teachers that show them in the classroom, and when I have kids I can't see any reason not to show them the movies to. (if there's something I don't know about them then I need to talk to some of the teachers I know about weather they should be shown in class)


Disney is trash.

Quote
Also would you mind sharing with me on the pants issue. Are Catholic girls allowed to wear pants? Or is it a personal thing for you and your family?


Women should wear distinguishing modest dress.  It's not directly part of the Catholic Faith, but the reason Western women wear pants has everything to do with anti-Catholic trends in society, blurring the roles between men and women.  And pants are less modest.


Should your children associate with non-Catholics?
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2009, 06:21:35 PM »
Quote from: kittycat496
Wait, Disney? Are you talking about the people that made Finding Nemo and Lady and the Tramp? I've never heard anything bad about them. Why don't you want kids watching them? I don't mean to sound rude I'm just curious because I watched them as a kid, I know many elementary teachers that show them in the classroom, and when I have kids I can't see any reason not to show them the movies to. (if there's something I don't know about them then I need to talk to some of the teachers I know about weather they should be shown in class)

Also would you mind sharing with me on the pants issue. Are Catholic girls allowed to wear pants? Or is it a personal thing for you and your family?



The Disney company has been advocating anti-Catholicism for many years. I could go into avid detail about the things they sponsored, but let me just give you a couple of examples.

First, their movie "Priest." Absolutely disgusting. It was on their Miramax label.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priest_(film)

Second, the movie, "Dogma" which was again, put on Miramax, one of their labels.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogma_(film)

Thirdly, haven't you heard about the subtleties that have been inserted into their "children's" movies?

For instance, the "pastor" in "The Little Mermaid" that has a visible erection during the ceremony?

Or the pollen when the Lion lies down on that mountain spelling out the word "Sex?"

Or Alladin, when you can hear "take off your clothes" not once, but twice in the movie?

Here is a compilation of some of them.



Just look at Ursula. Is this something you want your little girl watching?



She's fat, and she has huge breasts busting out immodestly.

Not to mention the fact that their movie "Powder" was produced by a convicted pedophile.

http://www.vachss.com/mission/disney.html

Wanna go back further? How about Donald Duck as a nαzι?



"We bring the world new order..."

Riiight.

I could go on, but chew on this first. I've been boycotting Disney (my family has) since I was 12, so for 20 years now.




Should your children associate with non-Catholics?
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2009, 10:33:41 PM »
Wow, actually I had never noticed those things in the Disney movies. I never would have thought to even look for something like that. I have seen the Lion King a bunch of times (first time when I was 7 it was awesome) and I never thought that the pollen spelled anything, it was always just random swirls to me.

I have a question why are pants immodest? Wouldn't they cover more then a skirt since they can't fly up? Is it all pants that are less modest or just tight pants? I'm trying to understand, since I run around in pants all the time.

Should your children associate with non-Catholics?
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2009, 12:04:57 AM »
Quote from: kittycat496
Wow, actually I had never noticed those things in the Disney movies. I never would have thought to even look for something like that. I have seen the Lion King a bunch of times (first time when I was 7 it was awesome) and I never thought that the pollen spelled anything, it was always just random swirls to me.

I have a question why are pants immodest? Wouldn't they cover more then a skirt since they can't fly up? Is it all pants that are less modest or just tight pants? I'm trying to understand, since I run around in pants all the time.


It took me a while before I totally got rid of the pants.

I haven't worn pants in public in a few years now.

I guess you could gauge your modesty by asking yourself if Our Lady would wear whatever you consider wearing.

My daughters wear leg warmers in the winter when it's cold out. Sometimes, I'll allow them to wear pants underneath a skirt, but not pants by themselves.

If you get long enough skirts, modest ones, you shouldn't have to worry about them flying up. I usually gauge the modesty of a skirt by the length. If it doesn't go past your knees, definitely immodest. It should extend past your kneecaps. Most of mine go down to my ankles, but that's because I prefer them that long. My daughters' skirts and dresses must go past their kneecaps in order for them to be worn. Anything shorter than that is really pushing it in terms of modesty.

Lately, some stupid designers have been adding slits into the skirts. Some of them are very long slits. The solution to this is to not buy skirts with very long slits, or take a needle and thread and sew them up yourself.

Pants are more immodest, IMO, because of the fact that you can see your um... buttcheeks. Which is unbecoming of a lady. Also, if your shirts are short, a man can also stare at your um.... frontal area, which is not appropriate either.

One thing you could consider if you're not ready to get rid of your pants, is to wear long shirts. I did that for a while, and eventually I just got rid of pants. Wearing a long shirt covers you up a bit better. Pants, IMO, are also really uncomfortable, and you'll realize this fact if you get in the habit of wearing skirts on a regular basis.

Another thing you could do, is if you're not quite comfortable with skirts just yet, is to wear a pair of shorts underneath them until you get used to them.

A promising fact is this, and I've noticed this since I cut out the pants completely.

 :rahrah:


Men open doors for ladies that are wearing skirts and dresses far more oft than they do for ladies wearing pants. You walk differently, you act more feminine. It's a proven fact that your attitude when you're dressed more feminine is that you start to act more feminine. We need that in this world, anyhow, and the more people there are doing it, the more acceptable it will become, and it may even become more of a NORM again with your good example.

I hope this helps a bit.  :wink: