Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Should women be allowed to vote?  (Read 11714 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marcelino

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1498
  • Reputation: +31/-3
  • Gender: Male
Should women be allowed to vote?
« Reply #30 on: July 27, 2012, 02:29:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Marcelino
    It is my understanding that Democracy originated in Ancient Greece.  One of the famous greek philosophers said something like, democracy always leads to tyranny.  I think that might make sense, for the following reasons.

    ~people are more prone to vice than virtue

    ~it is easier to appeal to vice, than virtue

    ~to win a democratic election you must appeal to the will of the people

    ~democracy seems to lead to vice, for what appear to be, obvious reasons

    ~indulging vice, leads to a loss of self control

    ~order must be maintained

    ~tyranny (i.e. "a police state") provides order






    I think the economy kind of works the same way.  The labor market's "race to the bottom" and advertiser's rationalization "sex sells."  Not to mention, usury.


    Offline magdalena

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2554
    • Reputation: +2037/-42
    • Gender: Female
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #31 on: July 27, 2012, 03:55:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The following is an interesting point of view.  It was written by Otto von Habsburg

    http://thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21561
    But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.
    Luke 10:42


    Offline Domitilla

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 479
    • Reputation: +1009/-29
    • Gender: Male
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #32 on: July 27, 2012, 04:10:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Magdalena,

    Thank you for posting this very interesting and thought provoking article.  I believe Catholic Monarchical government is the most efficacious means (and most likely to abide by Natural Law) to achieve man's end which is, of course, Heaven.

    Offline magdalena

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2554
    • Reputation: +2037/-42
    • Gender: Female
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #33 on: July 27, 2012, 05:23:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • May God bring back the Catholic Monarchies!



     :king:
    But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.
    Luke 10:42

    Offline jlamos

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 305
    • Reputation: +209/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #34 on: July 27, 2012, 06:25:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: magdalena
    May God bring back the Catholic Monarchies!


    Amen!

     :pray:


    Offline alaric

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3396
    • Reputation: +2503/-438
    • Gender: Male
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #35 on: August 03, 2012, 04:56:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Marcelino
    Quote from: alaric
    Quote from: PenitentWoman
    I'm thinking back to a sociology prof I had who was an uber feminist. He would kill me if he knew I even asked this.   :scared2:
    This is the problem we have here in this culture.....

    So-called "men" in our Academic halls of influence considering themselves "feminists" and controlling the thought process of our younger generation.

    I pray for the whole system to collapse someday.


    That seems like a prayer that will get a big fat yes.  

    They say, be careful what you wish for.  Without the order they provide, chaos will ensue (i.e. pirates hijacking ships off the coast of africa, areas without any police protection, no way of getting the state to enforce a contract, etc).  

    From the book, "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Western Civilization," I recall a story about a poet complaining, after the fall of the roman empire, that everything good was old.  For example, you couldn't find a decent new sword, because the means/skill to produce it, died with the roman empire.  

    Oh, it's coming soon. When a culture begins to become throughly feminized and corrupt like ours has and like the Romans eventually did, another race or "culture" if you will, will step and take control like the Germanic Goths did because the uber-feminine, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, weak-kneed Roman ruling class didn't have the heart of fortitude to fight the barbarian anymore and the military just goes with whoever is running the show at that point.

    This country as we know it is doomed, it's only an amount of time. I used to think it was a good 25 yrs away or not in my lifetime, but with everything that has transpired very quickly, especially with the Obamination in the WH who is actively doing his best with "change" and total usurpation of the foundation of the culture as we know it.

    A brutal paramilitant force will hold the day with men of real backbone and moral integrity who are not really concerned with "offending" any segment of society, no matter what they feel they're entitiled to.

    It took a  long time for Rome to collapse, I don't believe we will have to wait as long, these things in modern times move rather quickly.

    Offline brotherfrancis75

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 220
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #36 on: August 03, 2012, 08:43:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: alaric
    Quote from: Marcelino
    Quote from: alaric
    Quote from: PenitentWoman
    I'm thinking back to a sociology prof I had who was an uber feminist. He would kill me if he knew I even asked this.   :scared2:
    This is the problem we have here in this culture.....

    So-called "men" in our Academic halls of influence considering themselves "feminists" and controlling the thought process of our younger generation.

    I pray for the whole system to collapse someday.


    That seems like a prayer that will get a big fat yes.  

    They say, be careful what you wish for.  Without the order they provide, chaos will ensue (i.e. pirates hijacking ships off the coast of africa, areas without any police protection, no way of getting the state to enforce a contract, etc).  

    From the book, "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Western Civilization," I recall a story about a poet complaining, after the fall of the roman empire, that everything good was old.  For example, you couldn't find a decent new sword, because the means/skill to produce it, died with the roman empire.  

    Oh, it's coming soon. When a culture begins to become throughly feminized and corrupt like ours has and like the Romans eventually did, another race or "culture" if you will, will step and take control like the Germanic Goths did because the uber-feminine, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, weak-kneed Roman ruling class didn't have the heart of fortitude to fight the barbarian anymore and the military just goes with whoever is running the show at that point.

    This country as we know it is doomed, it's only an amount of time. I used to think it was a good 25 yrs away or not in my lifetime, but with everything that has transpired very quickly, especially with the Obamination in the WH who is actively doing his best with "change" and total usurpation of the foundation of the culture as we know it.

    A brutal paramilitant force will hold the day with men of real backbone and moral integrity who are not really concerned with "offending" any segment of society, no matter what they feel they're entitiled to.

    It took a  long time for Rome to collapse, I don't believe we will have to wait as long, these things in modern times move rather quickly.


    What Alaric says above is "spot on."  But that also only emphasises that in our domestic lives as Catholics we shall always live at least AS IF we are living in a proper and happy hereditary monarchy.  Whatever the severe Catholic dictatorship our future will surely require, we need to keep the high moral perspective to know that HEREDITARY MONARCHY is ALWAYS our one and only IDEAL.

    Which is to say:  VIVA CRISTO REY!





    Offline Loriann

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 388
    • Reputation: +106/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #37 on: August 03, 2012, 10:37:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, absolutely yes.  They are active participants in the republic.
    I am not alone, for the father is with me.


    Offline Marcelino

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1498
    • Reputation: +31/-3
    • Gender: Male
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #38 on: August 03, 2012, 11:58:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: alaric
    Quote from: Marcelino
    Quote from: alaric
    Quote from: PenitentWoman
    I'm thinking back to a sociology prof I had who was an uber feminist. He would kill me if he knew I even asked this.   :scared2:
    This is the problem we have here in this culture.....

    So-called "men" in our Academic halls of influence considering themselves "feminists" and controlling the thought process of our younger generation.

    I pray for the whole system to collapse someday.


    That seems like a prayer that will get a big fat yes.  

    They say, be careful what you wish for.  Without the order they provide, chaos will ensue (i.e. pirates hijacking ships off the coast of africa, areas without any police protection, no way of getting the state to enforce a contract, etc).  

    From the book, "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Western Civilization," I recall a story about a poet complaining, after the fall of the roman empire, that everything good was old.  For example, you couldn't find a decent new sword, because the means/skill to produce it, died with the roman empire.  

    Oh, it's coming soon. When a culture begins to become throughly feminized and corrupt like ours has and like the Romans eventually did, another race or "culture" if you will, will step and take control like the Germanic Goths did because the uber-feminine, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, weak-kneed Roman ruling class didn't have the heart of fortitude to fight the barbarian anymore and the military just goes with whoever is running the show at that point.

    This country as we know it is doomed, it's only an amount of time. I used to think it was a good 25 yrs away or not in my lifetime, but with everything that has transpired very quickly, especially with the Obamination in the WH who is actively doing his best with "change" and total usurpation of the foundation of the culture as we know it.

    A brutal paramilitant force will hold the day with men of real backbone and moral integrity who are not really concerned with "offending" any segment of society, no matter what they feel they're entitiled to.

    It took a  long time for Rome to collapse, I don't believe we will have to wait as long, these things in modern times move rather quickly.


    We've certainly got a mess on our hands.  American whites seem pretty willing to take the losses.  So, I don't see cινιℓ ωαr/regime changing uprising  from that.  Although, I don't think going from obama to romney = regime change, but you might.  A lot of folks probably would.  On the other hand, I don't think there's much holding this country together anymore, but brute  force and money.  At least, that is rapidly becoming the case.  So, that's where I think the break is going to occur.  Obviously, the wealth of the country is being depleted.  So, the money won't last forever and that's what pays for the brute force (basically mercenary, I think.  I know our military and police are aggressively brainwashed, but so are kids and everybody seems pretty skeptical.  So, I don't think our rulers are winning the hearts and minds of the people.  Hence, they must buy or coerce "loyalty" and that's not a good sign for regime health. :laugh1:)  

    I guess ruling people is always like that to a degree, but without a basically religiously and racially/ethnically homogenous group of people that seems pretty much dependent on raw power.  Although, maybe there's some mutual interest that will hold people together.  Still, personal ambition seems like it could mow that down.  

    So, catholic monarchy sounds fine, but it should only include catholics and it would help if those people looked a lot like each other and spoke the same language.  Maybe a group of monarchs, under an emperor.  In other words, a racially, ethnically and religiously segregated civilization.  

    But, I would think, whatever survives and provides order, will be in a position to rule america.  Unfortunately, the opportunity to choose the nature of it, may not be so great.  Sort of like after wwII, america was the only world power standing.  Or after the fall of the roman empire, the church provided order, but it was in a position to.  I assume it had armies and money/land and stuff, not just holy water and communion wafers.  

    Anyway, I'm rambling.  Maybe some greater mind can set me on the right path.  

    *i thought the sackers of rome were able to take rome, but not able to provide the order that the old empire had.  So, the empire sort of crumbled from within, which seems to be the case in america, particularly when you take a look at our poor, poor cities.  








    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #39 on: August 04, 2012, 12:07:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Hell in our politics we resemble the Third Republic in their savagery and in our cultural life we resemble Weimar Germany with filth and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. And we have the nerve to talk about "the greatness of American values." We need a confessional, no an exorcist!

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18528
    • Reputation: +5759/-1982
    • Gender: Female
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #40 on: August 04, 2012, 02:22:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Hell in our politics we resemble the Third Republic in their savagery and in our cultural life we resemble Weimar Germany with filth and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. And we have the nerve to talk about "the greatness of American values." We need a confessional, no an exorcist!


    I think many need confessional and an exoricist
    May God bless you and keep you


    Offline PenitentWoman

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 790
    • Reputation: +1031/-1
    • Gender: Female
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #41 on: August 04, 2012, 10:59:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: brotherfrancis75


    What Alaric says above is "spot on."  But that also only emphasises that in our domestic lives as Catholics we shall always live at least AS IF we are living in a proper and happy hereditary monarchy.  



    Brother Francis,  this brings me back to the original question. Should people not vote/participate in the process of democracy?  

    If so, where would someone like myself (a single woman) figure out who to vote for?
    ~For we are saved by hope. But hope that is seen, is not hope. For what a man seeth, why doth he hope for? But if we hope for that which we see not, we wait for it with patience. ~ Romans 8:24-25

    Offline Thorn

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1197
    • Reputation: +718/-86
    • Gender: Female
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #42 on: August 04, 2012, 09:05:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Before elections there generally are Voting Guides placed in the vestibule of the church.  You still must study & get as much info on the 'votees' as possible, but the Voting Guides has it all there in a nutshell.
    "I will lead her into solitude and there I will speak to her heart.  Osee 2:14

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #43 on: August 04, 2012, 09:12:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2008/11/05/behind-obamas-victory-women-open-up-a-record-marriage-gap

    Behind Obama's Victory: Women Open Up a Record Marriage Gap

    Unmarried women voted for Obama by a massive 70 to 29 percent

    By KENT GARBER
    November 5, 2008 RSS Feed  Print

    Young voters and Latinos are being widely credited with helping propel Barack Obama to a commanding victory, but an even greater source of support for the president-elect appears to have come from unmarried women—an important but often overlooked demographic.

    Unmarried women—a group that includes single, separated, divorced, or widowed women—voted for Obama over Republican opponent John McCain by a whopping 70 to 29 percent in yesterday's election, according to numbers released today by Women's Voices Women Vote, a nonpartisan organization.

    Married women, by contrast, preferred McCain by a slim 3 percentage-point margin, 50 to 47 percent.

    Unmarried women have historically voted for Democrats—in 2004, for example, 62 percent chose Sen. John Kerry over President Bush—but Obama's performance easily surpasses that of his predecessors.

    Overall, 53 percent of the national electorate this year was female, according to exit poll data. Women overall voted 56 to 43 percent for Obama; men voted 49 to 48 percent for him.

    Offline brotherfrancis75

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 220
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Should women be allowed to vote?
    « Reply #44 on: August 05, 2012, 01:07:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: PenitentWoman
    Quote from: brotherfrancis75


    What Alaric says above is "spot on."  But that also only emphasises that in our domestic lives as Catholics we shall always live at least AS IF we are living in a proper and happy hereditary monarchy.  



    Brother Francis,  this brings me back to the original question. Should people not vote/participate in the process of democracy?  

    If so, where would someone like myself (a single woman) figure out who to vote for?


    Dear Penitent Woman,

    In my humble but well-educated opinion, some suggestions for our Catholic ladies concerning politics might include:  1)  Most of all, the ladies shouldn't themselves take politics altogether too seriously.  We men ENJOY a good fight now and then and often our political quarrels include much male excess energy in need of an outlet.  For laymen, applying such energies to Catholic politics is usually most admirable, but for Catholic women that would probably only be a waste of your own precious time.  In other words, Catholic women need to keep a good sense of humor when it comes to scrappy male politics.  VERY few of us men are anything like perfect!  (Lord knows...)

    2)  Our Romanity includes the key idea of CITIZENSHIP.  Our more intelligent Catholic women therefore do have an important contribution to make to Catholic politics, or ROMAN politics.  But much the greatest contribution Catholic ladies could make to our politics would be to mightily support very SERIOUS Catholic education, including an intelligent teaching of our Roman Catholic political heritage.  For example, our schools ought to teach the writings of Dante Alighieri and our Holy Bible with attention to the political implications contained in those most crucial books, alongside the innumerable other strands of wisdom contained within them.  Receiving a political education well grounded in the Catholic Bible and Dante Alighieri would surely do more for our Catholic politics than anything else.

    3)  In politics our Catholic ladies should know that the men have not been doing their military duties very well lately, so at present nothing remotely resembling any "democratic process" either does or reasonably could be expected to exist.  When we Catholic men are such an embarrassing mob of quivering lily-livered wonders, democracy can only be a distant memory from a long-vanished past.  In America the last genuine democratic politics died with President Garfield back in 1881 and since then America has gone through the usual process of oligarchy, dictatorship and tyranny as outlined by Plato.  To participate in the American democratic process we would have to leap into our time machines and go back and bravely fight for the Confederacy.  But it's a bit late for that now...

    4)  Given that educated Catholics must deny the existence of contemporary political democracy, the actual purpose of our political organizations is above all to influence the military and help create a Catholic military leadership that would behave themselves like Catholic men and apply military force appropriately (VIRTUOUSLY!).  We Catholics have practically never risen to power through electoral politics, but almost always through influencing and forming elites in the most important cities that in turn come to power due to their awesome spiritual and natural superiority over everyone else.  For example:  Augustus, Vespasian, Constantine, Charlemagne, the Ottonian Emperors, the Hohenstauffen Emperors, the Hapsburg Emperors, the Napoleonic Emperors and the more recent German Reichs.  (In politics the late German Emperor Wilhelm II was a great and totally loyal Catholic Emperor in everything but name, as much earlier were the Old Testament Catholic Augustus Caesar and the private Catholic Vespasian.)

    So good Catholic ladies should support our Catholic politics especially by strongly supporting high-quality Catholic education and our incomparable Roman civilization.  And good Catholic manners are also a truly important example that only Catholic ladies can effectively achieve for all of us.  (Our Catholic laymen need to be much too busy breaking heads to have any sufficient time for that!)

    5)  Voting for the lesser of unspeakable evils (to mention the names of Obama or Romney is to grab desperately for our "vomit bags") is practically irrelevant to our Catholic politics.  Only Catholic ladies can have the opportunity and ability to do the hardest work to uphold our Catholic EDUCATION and CIVILIZATION and it is through making those singular contributions that you can and should undergird our Catholic politics and all the sometimes foolish male sport that forms it.

    In brief, to have a Catholic politics we require Catholic NATIONS.  What can our good Catholic ladies contribute to the formation of genuine real-life Catholic national leaderships?  THAT is the Catholic women's politics that we are in GREAT need of in our time.  Our only serious politics today must be Catholic Nationalism, which was once also referred to as "Catholic Imperialism."  Our polltics are simply our Romanity applied to the public life of this dark and fallen world.  

    That politics can also be summed up as in essence simply another name for ROMAN IMPERIALISM.  Everything good Catholic ladies can truly do to further that most noble goal is the one and only true Catholic politics for you.


    Your unworthy and devoted Franciscan friend,

    Brother Francis  

    P.S.:  Vote if you wish, but we are now living in another "Dark Age of King Arthur."  We live in an Age of Heroes that is now far gone beyond any possible solution by mere rigged voting machines...