If Scotland was bigger than it is, that might not be good or better for it. Why ambition if not a definite good? A definite good may be just about the size of Scotland now or even much less. Where there are people and problems, it may not be good to seek expansion too much. It may not be good "to party". The direction in which celebration goes can be a careful matter even if people get carried away. One may just as well keep an eye on his side of the fence sometimes as well as well. Like that's how a lot of people look at Joe Biden and the UN today. That's what a lot of people will do.
The Act of Union may or may not have been a mistake, according to opinions, but following the Union of Crowns, and the Treaty of Edinburgh, it helped add some of the ending to the Auld Alliance, and then the French some years later lost practically all of North America. French and Indian War (1754-1763), first "world war", for example. Justin Wilson done did heard that too. Effects of history, and then he passed away just before 9-11.
An Inside Job!
So we do have the Anglosphere and the Bank of England indeed, which seem to share some significant involvement with the Jєωs and Rothschild style devil bandits, and don't nobody with good intentions put thermite in the chicken pot, even in New York City, or graphene oxide in the vaccines.
univocity of being
if one types in "ralfy", he pops right up, like an elf almost
he's talking about quality and wider landscape views. He's as geocentric as Cartier was and he doesn't even know it.
Topic: Scotus and bad man Ralfy (Read 5151 times)