Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Catholic Living in the Modern World => Topic started by: SeanJohnson on June 23, 2022, 01:00:53 PM
-
It’s going to get wild.
Let it come!
:popcorn:
-
When the rioters hit
https://youtu.be/kMr24DqceEI
-
I have a hard time believing this is actually going to happen. I hope I'm wrong.
-
I was hoping for today. I'll settle for tomorrow.
However, if this dithering is being caused by the pro-life justices, every day the lives of the unborn are at risk in states where "trigger laws" will go into effect as soon as the decision comes down, and such dithering makes them no better than those who dragged their feet at Uvalde (according to MSM accounts), or those parents who accidentally leave their children in hot cars in the summer to die.
They need to get on the stick.
-
The end of the SCOTUS term is coming soon, so it's not entirely crazy to think that this could happen. The decision has to come eventually.
-
Please pray for the protection of the pro-life pregnancy centers and the churches.
-
They are overturning because a self spreading fertility "vaccine" is on the way
-
When the rioters hit
https://youtu.be/kMr24DqceEI
What in the world is that??!
But yeah, the portrayal of the pro-infanticide activist in that clip was uncannily accurate!!
-
When the rioters hit
https://youtu.be/kMr24DqceEI
This is my boom stick!
:jester:
-
What in the world is that??!
But yeah, the portrayal of the pro-infanticide activist in that clip was uncannily accurate!!
A bad movie lol
-
Either the decision will be released today, or they'll wait until just before the long 4th of July weekend for maximum protesting effect!
-
https://twitter.com/bulletinletters/status/1540337005393022976?s=21&t=O3nGWcUH7vZr3KHlb6cNXw
Roe v Wade overturned
-
The decision just dropped.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf)
They're already out in front of the Supreme Court howling. This one time, they're having to learn what it feels like, not to have things roll their way.
I'm rolling tape on NBC right now (already had it cued up earlier this morning).
-
And it took place the same year that Pope Francis "consecrated" the world to Our Lady's IH...not drawing any conclusions or anything such as that...just pointing it out
-
This means that as of now, about half the nation has abortion completely illegal. Wisconsin is an example.
-
And it took place the same year that Pope Francis "consecrated" the world to Our Lady's IH...not drawing any conclusions or anything such as that...just pointing it out
…and it happened during “pride month”
-
…and it happened during “pride month”
*ahem* MONTH OF THE SACRED HEART OF JESUS :incense:
-
I have a hard time believing this is actually going to happen. I hope I'm wrong.
Praise be to God. I can't believe this actually happened.
-
*ahem* MONTH OF THE SACRED HEART OF JESUS :incense:
Yes DL, I know and was going to state that fact but I saw it on another thread so didn't want to be repetitive...though good news always welcomes repitition.
-
And it took place the same year that Pope Francis "consecrated" the world to Our Lady's IH...not drawing any conclusions or anything such as that...just pointing it out
If you're not drawing any conclusions from that, then why did you "point" it out?
Why would there be any connection in the first place? Did Russia convert?
-
If you're not drawing any conclusions from that, then why did you "point" it out?
Why would there be any connection in the first place? Did Russia convert?
The decision certainly comes from God.
As regards Francis’s consecration, on the one hand, we know it certainly did not meet our Lady’s request (per Sr. Lucy at Tuy in 1929, who stated it was to mention Russia and nothing but Russia).
On the other hand, could our Lady still be desirous of obtaining this particular benefit (connected or unconnected to Francis’s consecration), while awaiting an obedient and exact consecration before granting the conversion of Russia? Of course.
One thing Sr. Lucy said at Tuy was that the results of the consecration would be conspicuous, and there would be no doubt that the effects were the direct result of the consecration. Maybe I’m blinded, but that doesn’t seem to be the case here.
So it would seem a little tenuous that both cause and effect would be missing in attributing this decision to the consecration:
Francis did not do what our Lady asked, and this decision was not what she promised (additionally, there are no Russians converting en masse, and Russia still spreads its errors).
But again, that is not at all to say heaven did not obtain this glorious decision. In fact, I believe it surely did. It just may have done so for reasons other than the consecration (such as those mentioned in the sermon thread).
-
The decision certainly comes from God.
As regards Francis’s consecration, on the one hand, we know it certainly did not meet our Lady’s request (per Sr. Lucy at Tuy in 1929, who stated it was to mention Russia and nothing but Russia).
On the other hand, could our Lady still be desirous of obtaining this particular benefit (connected or unconnected to Francis’s consecration), while awaiting an obedient and exact consecration before granting the conversion of Russia? Of course.
One thing Sr. Lucy said at Tuy was that the results of the consecration would be conspicuous, and there would be no doubt that the effects were the direct result of the consecration. Maybe I’m blinded, but that doesn’t seem to be the case here.
So it would seem a little tenuous that both cause and effect would be missing in attributing this decision to the consecration:
Francis did not do what our Lady asked, and this decision was not what she promised (additionally, there are no Russians converting en masse, and Russia still spreads its errors).
But again, that is not at all to say heaven did not obtain this glorious decision. In fact, I believe it surely did. It just may have done so for reasons other than the consecration (such as those mentioned in the sermon thread).
I'm unclear what your position is on the consecration and its possible connection with the USSC decision.
I see no connection whatsoever. You're right in saying it wasn't what Mary promised and Bergoglio didn't do what she asked. Furthermore, Russia has not converted. [and I'm not even touching upon whether he is a true pope which would negate any attempts in the first place]. I also do not see why Mary would want others to even think is it a result of the "consecration".
I completely agree that this decision has come with God's help...possibly through Mary's intercession.
-
https://www.arklatexhomepage.com/news/state-news/louisiana/shreveport-clinic-challenges-louisiana-abortion-trigger-laws/ (https://www.arklatexhomepage.com/news/state-news/louisiana/shreveport-clinic-challenges-louisiana-abortion-trigger-laws/)
And so it begins. I personally foresee a lot of state abortion bans being challenged and blocked in court.
-
https://www.arklatexhomepage.com/news/state-news/louisiana/shreveport-clinic-challenges-louisiana-abortion-trigger-laws/ (https://www.arklatexhomepage.com/news/state-news/louisiana/shreveport-clinic-challenges-louisiana-abortion-trigger-laws/)
And so it begins. I personally foresee a lot of state abortion bans being challenged and blocked in court.
Probably, but none of them have a chance, since the overturning of Roe kicks it back to the states.