Consider this post from the Anonymous subforum:

Im an employee in the administrative division of a hospital. I just received an email from my boss telling me to organize an LGBT party in June to commemorate gαy pride month. My boss said that there are employees in the hospital and patients who are LGBT and he said that they should be able to celebrate their orientation freely at the party. He said that he got this idea from a gαy co worker and so my boss has given me the job to organize it.

Im scared that if I say no, I might be fired. What should I do?

Without going into a long post about this, I just want to bring up ONE QUESTION in everyone's minds.

Which force is stronger?

A) The various perverts ("ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs", queers, gαys, transsɛҳuąƖs, bisɛҳuąƖs, etc.) who get jobs (they gotta eat, right?) and use their influence to nudge things in their desired direction whatever chance they get -- keeping in mind that the modern Politically Correct world (Hollywood, the media, etc.) is their ally. These men and women want a revolution.

B) The various Catholics and others who respect the Natural Law, but don't have any fervor about the issue, pro or con. They just want to maintain the status quo.


I'll give you the answer: those wanting a revolution are always more fervent than those who "fervently" want to maintain the status quo. It's hard to work hard and sacrifice deeply to "keep things the way they are". It just doesn't fire the blood, unfortunately.

I might be fervent in my love of God, but I don't wake up every morning saying to myself, "How can I help the world move a step closer to maintaining separate restrooms for men and women?" Most of the time I don't think about restrooms at all! You can't say the same thing for the perverts.

The same thing happened in Vatican II. The conservatives didn't have the same "do-or-die" zeal that the revolutionaries had. Who won?