Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10

Author Topic: Question for Croix de Fer  (Read 6804 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline happenby

Re: Question for Croix de Fer
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2018, 07:04:50 PM »
Quote from: Croix de Fer on July 03, 2018, 06:55:49 PM
Wrong. Your "equality" stance is feminist.

Firstly, during the marriage, the husband is the sole authority on how the money and assets are to be distributed within the family. It's not the wife's decision. God didn't intend such decisions to be hers. The husband is head of the household.

Secondly, in the event the wife "divorces" her husband through no fault of his own (it happens more often than not), she deserves absolutely nothing outside of child support for the kids, and even in cases of child support, she should not be relied upon as the conduit of the husband's resources to his kids. This is why a prenuptial agreement is necessary, and even better, also, avoidance of a state marriage license.
If the woman were to be paid, she'd have to draw income for several jobs: baby sitter, house cleaner, grocery shopper, meal prepper, nurse, doctor, butler, hostess, driver, night watch and a whole host of other duties. The woman would certainly be due the lion's share of the monetary value of her services in the case of divorce.  The man usually works a certain number of hours and does a single job, and actually gets paid for it. The woman's job is never done, she's on call 24 hrs a day and without remuneration for it.  Any gal that signed a 50/50 deal for prenup is a fool.  
Logged

Offline Smedley Butler

Re: Question for Croix de Fer
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2018, 07:25:18 PM »
Quote from: Croix de Fer on July 03, 2018, 06:55:49 PM
Wrong. Your "equality" stance is feminist.

Firstly, during the marriage, the husband is the sole authority on how the money and assets are to be distributed within the family. It's not the wife's decision. God didn't intend such decisions to be hers. The husband is head of the household.

Secondly, in the event the wife "divorces" her husband through no fault of his own (it happens more often than not), she deserves absolutely nothing outside of child support for the kids, and even in cases of child support, she should not be relied upon as the conduit of the husband's resources to his kids. This is why a prenuptial agreement is necessary, and even better, also, avoidance of a state marriage license.
By virtue of the sacrament joining them TOGETHER the assets acquired are not solely "his" - it is now THEIRS.
THAT MONEY IS NOT JUST YOURS, IT IS LITERALLY HERS ALSO. 
Even the IRS recognizes this and charges her taxes based on the joint filing.
It sounds like the one who needs protection from a predatory spouse would be the lady dumb enough to marry you.
Logged

Offline Matto

Re: Question for Croix de Fer
« Reply #12 on: July 03, 2018, 07:31:56 PM »
Quote from: happenby on July 03, 2018, 07:04:50 PM
If the woman were to be paid, she'd have to draw income for several jobs: baby sitter, house cleaner, grocery shopper, meal prepper, nurse, doctor, butler, hostess, driver, night watch and a whole host of other duties. The woman would certainly be due the lion's share of the monetary value of her services in the case of divorce.  The man usually works a certain number of hours and does a single job, and actually gets paid for it. The woman's job is never done, she's on call 24 hrs a day and without remuneration for it.  Any gal that signed a 50/50 deal for prenup is a fool.  
If a woman home schools the children I think her services are very valuable. But if she does not home school and sends the children to public school I don't think her services are that valuable. Most of the work in keeping a home has been made far easier than it used to be because of modern technology. How much do day care workers make anyway? Very little, and they take care of many children at a time, not just one or two.
Logged

Offline Croix de Fer

Re: Question for Croix de Fer
« Reply #13 on: July 03, 2018, 07:46:30 PM »
Quote from: Smedley Butler on July 03, 2018, 07:25:18 PM
By virtue of the sacrament joining them TOGETHER the assets acquired are not solely "his" - it is now THEIRS.
THAT MONEY IS NOT JUST YOURS, IT IS LITERALLY HERS ALSO.
Even the IRS recognizes this and charges her taxes based on the joint filing.
It sounds like the one who needs protection from a predatory spouse would be the lady dumb enough to marry you.

That doesn't nullify the fact that the husband is the head of the household, and only he should determine the distribution of the money & assets as he best sees fit for the family. It's not the decision of the wife. Furthermore, a woman loses rights to that material support when she "divorces" him and physically separates herself from him to be alone or to be with another man. The joint holding of money & assets is only in effect when the woman is physically, mentally, spiritually & emotionally in union her husband. That means she must be by his side. Just because the Church still deems the man and woman married, even in the event of her "divorcing" him and moving away from him, doesn't mean she is entitled to half of what they shared as a married couple. Why don't you protest the fact that courts give far more than half of what was held by the couple to the wife during "divorce", if you're so concerned about equal distribution of everything? You sissy brain.
Logged

Offline B from A

Re: Question for Croix de Fer
« Reply #14 on: July 03, 2018, 07:51:47 PM »
Quote from: Smedley Butler on July 03, 2018, 07:25:18 PM
It sounds like the one who needs protection from a predatory spouse would be the lady dumb enough to marry you.
.
:laugh2:
.
:applause:
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
« previous next »