Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Girls At University  (Read 3631 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cantarella

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7782
  • Reputation: +4579/-579
  • Gender: Female
Girls At University
« Reply #30 on: October 26, 2014, 03:28:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: awkwardcustomer


    And stop blaming feminism for everything.  There is far more to the collapse of Europe, and America, than that!



    The evil of feminism is responsible for the total collapsing of the family, the home, and the whole world. They took the mother out of the home, the whole society broke down. As women go, so goes society. If there are no mothers and wives, there are only chaos and destruction. Simple as that.

    If women understood the great influence they actually have on men, many more would be more determined to restore their higher dignity again as wives and mothers. Not as playthings that provide cheap and convenient sex to sɛҳuąƖly immature men or as "intellectual" male-like professionals that are trained to be a constant "competition" to the men, as modern women are ferociously indoctrinated by the liberal Jєωιѕн media.

    There is no society restoration until the diabolical feminism that takes mothers out of the home (leaving children abandoned and husbands unattended) is for ever done and over with. The level of any civilization is dictated by the level of its womanhood. Women that raise sons and mold husbands to highest standards.
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline ThomisticPhilosopher

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 461
    • Reputation: +210/-4
    • Gender: Male
    Girls At University
    « Reply #31 on: October 26, 2014, 03:30:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Marlelar
    While those risks Matthew mentioned are certainly possible, I don't think avoiding those risks out weigh the risk of consigning innumerable women to ignorance and poverty because of fear of the world.  

    Would you say the same thing about high school?  Grade school?  Certainly their are risks attending those too.  There are few good traditional schools and not everyone can home school, sometimes public schools are the only option for a family to educate their children.  It's not like 60 years ago when there was a decent Catholic school in almost every neighborhood.  Thank you very much Vatican 2 :sad:

    I don't say that all young women should go to college, I just don't think they should be denied it out of hand.  It is a decision that would need some hard and long thought.

    Marsha


    Yes, the idea that they can't or shouldn't attend college, a-priori is wrong. The more educated a woman is, the better. It is not the number one priority, but I would say its really close to it. Its important to have someone who has some brains, the children need to be raised with anti-modernist principles and having this be reinforced by both parents is crucial. Most kids become atheist when they leave the home, and they accept evolution as true, mainly because they were never educated at home precisely why those errors are silly (I am talking from a philosophical and scientific point of view). If you have someone that can't be able to discern, then you are toast. Modern society is not meant for the simple, because they will be deceived to such a great degree in the Great apostasy, I really feel for these poor souls. My prayer is that the Good Lord will protect them, or take them before things gets worse.

    Wisdom, is mostly passed on through experience and example, few are those who seek it without the aid of friends or someone to show you the way. Having a wife that can barely read (+Williamson seems to be of the opinion primary school is all that is necessary, which I think is definitely wrong), is not going to be the smartest choice. Who is going to aid you in teaching the children, the psalms, scripture, thomist principles etc... You want to raise future little Saint Thomas's, because that is how this crisis will be solved, by applying and raising children according to the mind of the Church, with wisdom and virtue. How many times Padre Pio would tell women that they have aborted a future priest who was going to be crucial in the saving of the Church... What is even more abominable, is how many women consider the option of abortion simply because the male is the one pushing it. How distressing it can be for someone young who will raise the child alone, and then this gets carried over to the parents naturally.  

    +Williamson doesn't take into account the differences in modern life and the past. This is why some of the previous arguments used, really don't apply. Modern man is a whole different creature and our sensibilities have really changed.  Just take for example in the Benedictine rule, how kids could join a monastery at a much much younger age. However, this ruling was later over turned and changed by a Pope in the future. I can't give you the specific source, but just take my word for it (don't have it with me at the moment). People used to marry at a much younger age, but I would NOT recommend this for most people now. The main reason is that the levels of maturity that people had before was a huge difference with modern society. Plus the law says in the U.S. that you have to be 18, there are some exceptions to this, but I generally think that it is a good law.

    Don't worry you will have plenty of years to have lots of babies, and a nice big family. Just attempt to have as good of a start as possible, since work is so difficult to find. Most important thing for a family to be stable, [b]is for the man to have a stable job/income.[/b] It really doesn't matter whether he is self-employed or working for someone so long as he is earning enough to take care of the necessities of life + a bit more for enjoyment. The whole family structure goes down the toilet, once you have mom having to look for employment outside of the home.

    Also the previous advice I gave, would also help house wives who want to have that back up plan just in case anything happens to your husband or if God forbid, he leaves you. Unfortunately, in the minds of many young ladies there is always that little worm of doubt, of what happens if he leaves me etc... It is deplorable and in part I can't really blame many women for wanting to pursue a career, honestly most guys out there are a bunch of idiots who can't even provide for the basics (without the Daddy state), that have no concept of manliness or sense of duty.

    The modern welfare state has been fed and keeps increasing, precisely because of single mothers. I don't want to go too deep into the whole economic aspect, but pretty much the real daddy/provider of most kids out there is the modern atheist state. They are the ones who educate the children, feed the child, give a home to the child (welfare, public schooling, food stamps and housing). How many cower away from their God given duty to provide, it just sickens my stomach to think about it. I have seen it in my nuclear family, and extended family. I just have two sisters (4 brothers), but ohh dear is it harder to have sisters! God Bless the father's who have nothing but daughters. My heart goes out to you, if you manage it okay you are certainly destined to go to heaven! ^_^  

    By the way Happy Feast of Christ the King. Amen.

    May His reign extend to all faithful believers, and lead to our conversions to total submission of His will. Amen! Que viva Cristo Rey! Viva!
    https://keybase.io/saintaquinas , has all my other verified accounts including PGP key plus BTC address for bitcoin tip jar. A.M.D.G.


    Offline awkwardcustomer

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 457
    • Reputation: +152/-12
    • Gender: Male
    Girls At University
    « Reply #32 on: October 26, 2014, 04:49:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Cantarella said,
    Quote

    There is no society restoration until the diabolical feminism that takes mothers out of the home (leaving children abandoned and husbands unattended) is for ever done and over with. The level of any civilization is dictated by the level of its womanhood. Women that raise sons and mold husbands to highest standards.

    There was no feminism at the time of the Protestant Reformation, and yet the true Church of Christ was still driven out of most of northern Europe.  All those stay at home mothers raising large families couldn't prevent that from happening.

    Likewise, there was no feminism during the time of Christ.  And yet again, no amount of faithful wives caring for their husbands and many children could prevent Christ from being nailed to the Cross.

    I think you are seriously overestimating the influence that you have, not on your own families, of course, because I am sure your influence is truly beneficial, but on wider society at large.  If you are looking for the source of the current, unprecedented revolt against God and His Church, then look into the darkness of the human heart.  That's where you'll find it.  Feminism, I agree, is a hugely destructive force.  But it is a symptom of evil, not the cause of it.  And that evil will not be stemmed by calls for a return to traditional families.  Such calls will undoubtedly help those individuals who are fortunate enough to be raised in traditional families.  But that, sadly, is the extent of it.


    Offline glaston

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 384
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Girls At University
    « Reply #33 on: October 26, 2014, 04:59:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Degree/University - "topping-off" ceremony


    Etymology
    mortar-board, "academic cap," 1854, probably from mortar (1) + board (n.1); so called because it resembles a mason's square board.

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Girls At University
    « Reply #34 on: October 26, 2014, 07:17:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: awkwardcustomer
    You have gone way over the line in saying this.  I am constantly defending men from the attacks of feminists.  I have even posted, somewhere on this forum, that I accuse women of 'sexism' when they denigrate men. But just as I cannot bear the constant mockery of men that fills the media and a lot of social scenes, I have little tolerance for the reverse, especially when it is entirely ill-informed. Your comments are a caricature, since you so obviously know little of how the sɛҳuąƖ revolution of the sixties evolved.


    I know how the sixties started. It started with the Jєωιѕн and Marxist Frankfurt School, which created cultural Marxism of course, down to Herbert Marcuse during the 1960's who was the inspirational leader of the counter-culture, and Jєωιѕн women like Betty Freiden and Gloria Steinem.


    Offline awkwardcustomer

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 457
    • Reputation: +152/-12
    • Gender: Male
    Girls At University
    « Reply #35 on: October 26, 2014, 08:34:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Traditional Guy 20
    Quote from: awkwardcustomer
    You have gone way over the line in saying this.  I am constantly defending men from the attacks of feminists.  I have even posted, somewhere on this forum, that I accuse women of 'sexism' when they denigrate men. But just as I cannot bear the constant mockery of men that fills the media and a lot of social scenes, I have little tolerance for the reverse, especially when it is entirely ill-informed. Your comments are a caricature, since you so obviously know little of how the sɛҳuąƖ revolution of the sixties evolved.


    I know how the sixties started. It started with the Jєωιѕн and Marxist Frankfurt School, which created cultural Marxism of course, down to Herbert Marcuse during the 1960's who was the inspirational leader of the counter-culture, and Jєωιѕн women like Betty Freiden and Gloria Steinem.

    That's right. That's how it started.

    And millions of men just lapped it up, welcoming the sɛҳuąƖ revolution with open arms, to the horror of countless numbers of women, as I well remember.  


    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1662/-51
    • Gender: Male
    Girls At University
    « Reply #36 on: October 27, 2014, 04:46:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: awkwardcustomer
    That's right. That's how it started.

    And millions of men just lapped it up, welcoming the sɛҳuąƖ revolution with open arms, to the horror of countless numbers of women, as I well remember.


    I believe you are speaking of the liberal spoiled brats during that era, caused by the so-called 'Greatest Generation' parenting of saying, "My kids not going to have it as rough as I did." You're really naive if you think men started to have sex with women during this time period when the 1950's was hardly a Victorian Era on sɛҳuąƖ morality, the only difference being men kept such things in the closet while during the 1960's they paraded it as a mark of pride. Quite a few Presidents like Wilson, FDR, JFK, Eisenhower, LBJ, Harding, etc. had affairs up to this time period. The difference with the 1960's was this was when women really started to get the idea that they could have their little one-night stands just like men did. Oh yes and as I mentioned it was the first time hardcore drugs were used in a massive number. Actually their behavior along with riots reminds me of the Jacobins of the French Revolution.