Come on, guys.  Cary Landry is an all-time Novus Ordo Great.  He belongs in the Conciliar Hall of Fame, and it's a wonder that his cause hasn't been introduced in Rome.

Speaking of causes introduced, I hear that Bergoglio will "beatify" JPI later this year.  This string of saint-popes is unnrivalled since the early days of the Martyr Popes.  Saints Roncalli, Montini, Wojtyla, and (soon-to-be) Luciani.  Undoubtedly Ratzinger and Bergoglio will join them.  Shouts of "santo subito" will echo through Vatican City shortly after their demise.  We've had nearly a half century of Saint-Popes, as reflected in the unprecedented glory and triump of the Church since Roncalli's election in 1958.

I'm not sure where you get the "all" part of "with all the bishops of the world".  Seems to fall short.

In addition, this isn't a consecration of Russia.  This is a consecration of "ourselves, the Church, and all humanity" (with a shout-out to Ukraine and Russia as being part of that "humanity"). 

No, it is a consecration "especially" of Russia and Ukraine, with a shout out to all of humanity, the Church and the world.  As a member of humanity, the Church and the world, but not Russia or Ukraine, I welcome the shout out.

Nor is there any notion of making reparation for the blasphemies against the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  This is merely a prayer of petition (not reparation) asking for peace.

I've noticed a lot of new conditions popping up over the past several days.  The prayer itself does not have to mention reparation for blasphemies against the Immaculate Heart.  That is the intention of the related first Saturday devotion.  All that is required for the consecration is that Russia be consecrated to the Immaculate heart by the Pope and bishops of the world.

This seems to fall short.

What is required element of the Consecration is missing?

I was hoping it would have met all the criteria, because it would have helped to resolve our dispute over whether Jorge Bergoglio is a legitimate pope.

It does and it will.  You will soon know with 100% certainty, as I already do, that Francis is the Pope and that the Roman Catholic Church, which you call the "Conciliar Church," is the true Church with the four marks. 

I would also have felt better if they thought to mention Our Blessed Mother's name.  "Mother of God, our Blessed Mother Mary".  Otherwise, whose to know if by "Mother" Bergoglio doesn't mean Pachamama?

 
Here are some of the titles that the prayer does contain: 

Oh Mary, Mother of God and our mother. ... Mother of mercy ... Therefore, O Mother, hear our prayer. Star of the Sea... Ark of the New Covenant... Queen of Heaven... Queen of the Rosary... Queen of Peace ... Holy Mother of God ... Mother Mary.

It should be clear to Catholics who he is referring to.

That is the intention of the related first Saturday devotion.

That's incorrect.  Intention of BOTH the Saturday devotion AND the consecration were stated to be repetition.

You really are doing some creative reading and interpretation here.

Of course, the main requirement missing here is that it be done by the Pope.  Bergoglio is not the pope.

More than that, Rabbi Berg is doubtfully a bishop. And, if the initial Spanish translation of the 1968 Ordination Rite was as bad as the English translation, he might not even be a priest.

Interesting to see some here dig through this pile of shit just to pull out little kernels that fit their definition of a consecration.

Kind of like how Vatican II and its teachings are treated.

I was hoping it would have met all the criteria, because it would have helped to resolve our dispute over whether Jorge Bergoglio is a legitimate pope.

Although that would be nice, I don't believe that it would.