"Poor Material"?  These guys constantly understate what's going on, spinning it as if these guys are just "defective" or "weak in faith".  They're deliberately destroying the Church.  They are infiltrators working on behalf of the Judae-Masonic-Communist World Order.

Yep. That was my impression too. I get what he was saying, as why I said they were "good points" but he has to convert to Catholicism first.
 Unfortunately, Father thinks sedevacantism stems from making judgments about Francis's interior forum rather than his heretical actions. It's unfortunate he's taken such a position, otherwise he's a solid priest.

Unfortunately, Father thinks sedevacantism stems from making judgments about Francis's interior forum rather than his heretical actions. 

Sedevacantism is only secondarily about the pope at all (whether interior dispositions or heretical actions).  It's about what we believe about the Catholic Church.

R&R:  Church is capable of teaching grave error, of leading souls to hell, and of promulgating a Rite of Mass (Church's publish worship) that undermines faith and offends God.

SV:  Church can't do that.

Conservative Novus Ordo agree with SV, while liberal Novus Ordo agree with R&R on this MAJOR (of the entire crisis).

MAJOR:  Catholic Church cannot do such evil (SVs + Conservative NO) - rejected by R&R and Liberal NO
MINOR:  Conciliar Church did such evils. (SVs + R&R) -- rejected by Conservative NO + Liberal NO
CONCLUSION:  Conciliar Church is not the Catholic Church (SVs)

*Liberal NOs like the reforms, but might think, for example, that the Church did evil in the past

Catholic Encyclopedia

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01559a.htm



St. John supposes in his Epistles that the early Christians are acquainted with the teaching concerning the coming of Antichrist. "You have heard that Antichrist cometh" (1 John 2:18); "This is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh" (1 John 4:3). Though the Apostle speaks of several Antichrists, he distinguishes between the many and the one principal agent: "Antichrist cometh, even now there are become many Antichrists" (1 John 2:18). Again, the writer outlines the character and work of Antichrist: "They went out from us, but they were not of us" (1 John 2:19); "Who is a liar, but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denies the Father, and the Son" (1 John 2:22); "And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God; and this is Antichrist" (1 John 4:3); "For many seducers are gone out into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh: this is a seducer and an Antichrist" (2 John 7). Also the time, the Apostle places the coming of Antichrist at "the last hour" (1 John 2:18); again he maintains that "he is now already in the world" (1 John 4:3).

Taylor Marshall

What if "2 Popes" do a "Double Consecration" of Russia?
4min 12sec





I'm so tired of the good pope vs bad pope false paradigm.


Both Benedict and Francis went to the Wailing Wall which is a public sign of denouncing of the Holy Sacrifice of Jesus (and prayer to the female Shekhinah?) and waiting for the coming of the Moshiach (Antichrist) and building of the third temple.


What's more is that both have made many statements showing they would be considered antichrists by St John the Apostle.

Benedict said Jєωs don't need to be converted. 

St John would call him an antichrist.