I would then take "all" literally.

Just thinking out loud, do you suppose Bishops Williamson, Faure, Zendejas, et al, will participate?  So far as I'm aware, they're not sedevacantists.

Generally the Church has taken the term all as a moral unanimity.  You can say that something is a "universal" practice or belief of the Church ... even if you find an occasional exception here or there.  In any group, you can always find an imbalanced person.   So, for instance, the Church universally recognized St. Pius X as the true pope, but I bet that if you dug enough, you could find some nutcase who concluded otherwise.

I think Pope Pius X1 was the pope Our Lady was asking to consecrate Russia and it was meant to be done in the early 30's to prevent WW2 and the takeover of the world by communism following the war. Obviously, for whatever reason, he didn't do it unfortunately. For that reason, he was not a good pope.

For 'pope francis' to do this now is just an insult and mockery of Fatima and Our Lady.

Yes, it was meant to be done long ago.  No, Pope Pius XI was not the only pope who had the duty to do it.  Our Lord told Sr Lucy in the 30s that (paraphrasing) "As long as it took the kings of France to do their consecration, so the popes will also delay."  France was consecrated 100 years to the day from when Our Lord asked.  100 years from Fatima's "ask" is 2029.  The Fatima request is still applicable to our times...
 apparition at Rianjo 1931:

Apparition at Rianjo 1931
"It is never too late to recourse to Jesus and Mary"'

https://fatima.org/the-apparition-at-rianjo-1931/

Fr. Jenkins on Francis's upcoming "consecration", starts at about 41 minutes in.

https://rumble.com/vxipb9-what-catholics-believe-3152021.html

I agree with the points Fr. Jenkins made about Francis needing to publicly repent of his errors before his "consecration" would give this more legitimacy among those who believe he is the Supreme Pontiff, and not just an act of the Pope of the New Order, which would be fruitless.

Without the bishops, it won’t be THE consecration but it’ll be A consecration.  I don’t see any downside so I hope it happens.  Even if +Francis intends to mock God by this, the consecration act itself is good.  So God can thereby still bless good Catholics, for acts done by their bad leaders.  Gods omnipotence and eternal wisdom allows Him to bring good out of evil and to use bad men for good purposes.  Let us not despair!

Yes, it was meant to be done long ago.  No, Pope Pius XI was not the only pope who had the duty to do it.  Our Lord told Sr Lucy in the 30s that (paraphrasing) "As long as it took the kings of France to do their consecration, so the popes will also delay."  France was consecrated 100 years to the day from when Our Lord asked.  100 years from Fatima's "ask" is 2029.  The Fatima request is still applicable to our times...

Without the bishops, it won’t be THE consecration but it’ll be A consecration.  I don’t see any downside so I hope it happens.  Even if +Francis intends to mock God by this, the consecration act itself is good.  So God can thereby still bless good Catholics, for acts done by their bad leaders.  Gods omnipotence and eternal wisdom allows Him to bring good out of evil and to use bad men for good purposes.  Let us not despair!

1. I don't get it. How can things be stretched out another seven years considering the way they are and how they're going? Will Putin spend 7 more years slowly dissembling NATO until he finally goes into Germany a la Irlamir? Look what Covid did in just a couple years? How do we get another 7 out of the world?

2. Every consecration that is not THE consecration just muddies the waters further. It's going to look like a fad that both liberal and conservative popes engage in whenever they need a moral boost.

Yes, it was meant to be done long ago.  No, Pope Pius XI was not the only pope who had the duty to do it.  Our Lord told Sr Lucy in the 30s that (paraphrasing) "As long as it took the kings of France to do their consecration, so the popes will also delay."  France was consecrated 100 years to the day from when Our Lord asked.  100 years from Fatima's "ask" is 2029.  The Fatima request is still applicable to our times...

Pax, you have your dates mixed up. The consecration took place 103 years later. King Louis lost his power exactly 100yrs.

Our Lords request for the Consecration to the Sacred Heart = June 17,1689
King Of France stripped of power = June 17, 1789
King Louis XVI made a private consecration as prisoner of his own palace = 1792
King Louis XVI was beheaded before making the another consecration public = 1793

Our Lord said that the Popes will make a similar mistake. And they have. We know this because the Consecration was to prevent the spread of Russian Errors. It is pretty obvious that consequences from that warning have already started a long time ago, especially immediately post WW2. Pius XII did the consecration with a few bishops in attendance but it was late. Our Lord was never specific what "late" means. Is it 2, 25, or 100 years, anyone can speculate. But since we have dealing with the impact of communism on a global scale since WW2, the spreading of errors has already surrounded us. If the 100years has any relevance, it would mirror the carnage and persecution of the French Revolution but on a global scale. 
By the way, even Sr. Lucy had hopes that Pius XII was sufficient. She didn't hold such a strong opinion compared to others who armchair Fatima quaterbacks.