If anyone finds the consecration prayer, please post it.  Thx.

Interesting, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre Died: March 25, 1991, Martigny, Switzerland.

There is an ancient tradition in the Church's history that held that our Lord died on the same day He was conceived -- March 25th!

I think it was Bl Anne Catherine Emmerich who said that March 25 is the holiest day of the year:
1.  Day that Adam was created
2.  Feast of the Annunciation
3.  Good Friday

Quite a lot of symbolism there, if true.

A valid consecration to the Immaculata this will not be, as Bergoglio is not the Pope. Certainly, it will consecrate the world to demons and the Kabbalah, but not the sacred Immaculate Heart of the Mother of Our Lord.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-invites-all-to-join-in-solemn-act-of-consecration-of-humanity/ Francis won't consecrate Russia validly after all. I am not surprised

That settles it.

That settles it.

I called that out minutes after it was released.  Also, the intention is to obtain peace (end the current invasion of Ukraine).  But Our Lady asked for it to be an act of reparation to the Immaculate Heart of Mary for blasphemies.  There's no reparatory intent here whatsoever.  It's just a prayer of petition to bring peace.  Completely worthless.

So the kind of peace Bergoglio wants is the freedom for Globohomo to spread perversion and sodomy throughout the world ... and to keep pushing and forcing the abortion-stained jab?

I've been informed that even a Resistance bishop, Bp. Tomás de Aquino, is going to "consecrate" with Bergoglio. That's kinda funny, even more because Bp. Tomás de Aquino refused to sing Te Deum along members of the SSPX some time ago for occasion of Benedict XVI doing something. Ironic.

The NEO-SSPX is losing its mind over this. It is like they have died and gone to heaven. The groveling over an apostate and layman(Bergolio)consecrating Russia to the Immaculate Heart is just the ticket they need to get more Novus Ordos to come to their chapel. This will keep the coffers filled so that they can continue building monuments. Meanwhile, the actual Novus Ordo sect could care less about what Bergolio says. You can make this stuff up. The SSPX is on their hands and knees over his, while the NO is entirely indifferent.

All part of The Great Reset as re-setting narratives back to 2008-2014 is part of the goal. I hope Dom Tomás doesn't go through with the consecration.

No. No we do not. This shows you don't even understand the SV position. It is the fact that these heresies and errors have come through the universal ordinary magisterium, which is impeccable and infallible and protected by the Holy Ghost, that we conclude that these men cannot possibly be legitimate Popes. Not because they are capable of sin, error and abuses themselves.

DL, what the pope teaches is not always the teachings of the Church's Universal and Ordinary Magisterium.
(1) When we say "Universal" we always mean since the time of the Apostles and for all time,
(2) When we say "Magisterium", we mean teachings of the Church that enjoy the full authority of the Church,
(3) When we say "Ordinary", we mean all teachings of the Church taught in the usual, day to day manner through the Church's hierarchy, priests, nuns, parents, teachers, and so on.

The Church's Universal Magisterium, which is indeed always infallible, is not the pope, or the pope and bishops, or a Council. The duty of the pope is to protect, preserve and promulgate the Church's teachings, i.e. the Church's Magisterium, but he is not divinely protected from not doing his duty or promulgating corrupted doctrines.

The Syllabus of Errors:
Quote

Quote

22. The obligation by which Catholic teachers and authors are strictly bound is confined to those things only which are proposed to universal belief as dogmas of faith by the infallible judgment of the Church. — Letter to the Archbishop of Munich, “Tuas libenter,” Dec. 21, 1863.

R&R's follow this error^

The Pope is infallible on definitions of faith and morals, that's it. And this is due to his authority being bound up in the magisterium. He isn't impeccable, we've never argued that. Alexander VI, along with the other Borgia Popes abused the powers of the papal office but NEVER pronounced heresy through the universal ordinary magisterium like these post-conciliar popes have.

No, it is altogether ridiculous to say R&R follow the condemned error.  To be clear, the pope is infallible only when he defines a doctrine ex cathedra concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church, beyond that he can do exactly what the conciliar popes have done, and worse if he chooses to do so. 

The error of the sedes is the idea that the infallibility that protects the Church in all that concerns faith or morals, also protects it from every and all error detrimental to the Church and Faith. This apparent irremediable error is  one of the fundamental errors of sedeism.