
BS ... again, from Fr. Kramer (or Mr. Kramer ... he needs to get his ordination taken care of, and I'm sure there are bishops out there who'd be happy to oblige him, including +Vigano). Pius XII clearly taught that someone becomes Pope the instant he accepts the election. Once he accepts, he's the Pope, and this cannot be undone by some "universal un-acceptance". Canon Law also clearly states that resignation under grave duress is invalid. Talk about ignorance of Canon Law, and the teaching of Pius XII. Instead of blovating, perhaps Mr. Kramer could cite the specific Canon Law that trumps thet teaching of Pius XII that a man becomes pope the instant he accepts. Not a single citation of the purported Canon Law, just bloviation.
Mr. Kramer has also never addressed the problem that the manifest heresy he accused Bergoglio of holding (denying the Council of Florence) was also taught by both Ratzinger and Wojtyla (Wojtyla in fact invented it).
If Pius XII taught that a man becomes Pope the instant he accepts, then in claiming that the Pope could be deposed by universal un-acceptance Kramer would be guilty of heresy by his own standards, where he holds that since Vatican I it's heresy to assert that a Pope can be deposed by anyone (even ministerially).