That's because of your sedeism OCD, which is rampant among sedes. Fr. Wathen calls it a syndrome, I think he is being kind.
The truth is, it is only your opinion and nothing more that popes are not popes. You sedes elevate your opinion to be at a level on par with certainty of faith, then decide everyone else is wrong, Old Catholics, heretics or whatever. See my sig.
So faithful Catholics had a pope(s) who wanted to bind us to heresy but we did not listen to him. What crime or sin are we guilty of?
Is there a sede here who will actually answer the simple, clear question with a simple, clear answer?
Pathetic
ad hominem rant, but it doesn't come close to explaining the contradiction.
EENS dogma states that there's no salvation without subjection to the Supreme Pontiff. You claim Jorge Bergoglio is the Pope. You refuse subjection to Jorge Bergoglio. Ergo, you're outside the Church and there can be no salvation for you until you rectify the situation.
While I know that logic and syllogisms aren't your thing, for the sake of other readers:
MAJOR: There can be no salvation without subjection to the Supreme Pontiff. [DOGMA]
MINOR: Jorge Bergoglio is the Supreme Pontiff. (held by Stubborn)
MINOR: Stubborn refuses subjection to Jorge Bergoglio.
CONCLUSION: Stubborn cannot be saved (being outside the Church due to refusal of subjection).
QED