I am taking a momentary hiatus from my boycott of posting on CI to lay out the case for why poche must be banned.  I will, hereafter, not post again until he is gone.  I believe that I owe an explanation for my behavior in order for it to have its intended effect.

poche pertinaciously promotes the error and heresy of religious indifferentism which has been condemned by a long line of Traditional Catholic Popes.  After the RBG controversy, he followed up by posting a bogus private revelation to the effect that some Protestant went straight to heaven.  Even among Catholics, who benefit from the Sacraments of the Church, it is an exceedingly rare thing for someone to bypass Purgatory and go straight to heaven; it's only through the indulgences in possession of the Church and not accessible to non-Catholics that this could happen, since it is nearly impossible to undo the temporal consequences of our sins without this Mercy.

To this end, poche has gone so far as to slander Pope St. Pius X by providing a partial quotation which might, to those unacquainted with the context, suggest that the saint himself promoted religious indifferentism.  Supplying the very next sentence, truncated deliberately by poche, demonstrated the exact opposite.  He has repeatedly distorted and lied and taken things out of context to promote his heresies.

poche also pertinaciously promotes the error and heresy of Modernism, defending Bergoglio's most outrageous heterodox statements.

Continuing to allow poche to promote heresy in a public forum is to be complicit in his activities ... and is a grave sin.  So I take this action, and make this statement, in a spirit of charity, as a rebuke to Matthew for allowing him to continue promoting heresy and error.  Several Councils instructed that the toleration of heresy is tantamount to heresy itself.  Some popes have been condemned for the "mere" toleration of heresy.  And here, by refusing to ban poche, Matthew actively tolerates heresy.

To claim that poche is merely a "harmless" reminder to us of the errors in the Novus Ordo is to trivialize the gravity of the heresies and other errors he promotes.  Ideas matter, Matthew; dogmas and doctrine and heresies matter -- as Bishop Williamson regularly instructed us.  That is why the Church has been so zealous to condemn every error, because she knew well the consequences of such errors over time.  Besides that, the entire world is swimming with the errors that poche promotes, and there's no need for this constant reminder.  We can merely read the daily headlines of what continuously emanates from the Conciliar Whore of Babylon.

By constantly proclaiming that his behavior is tolerable among Catholics, you demonstrate that you are slowly being poisoned by this relativism which has infected the entire world.

St. Pius X would have excommunicated a hundred times over a (prominent) figure who promoted the ideas that poche does, to rid the Church of the contagion of heresy.

And, as an aside to Meg, who claims that the toleration of poche is on the same level as the toleration of sedevacantism, that is utter nonsense.  All Traditional Catholics admit the sedevacantist premises, that the Conciliar Church has taught error and heresy, and Father Chazal concedes the sedevacantist premise that Bergoglio is a manifest heretic.  Even if the sedevacantists are mistaken, at worst they are misapplying their conclusions regarding a hotly-contested (and unresolved by the Church) theological question regarding what happens to a heretical pope.  This is nowhere near the same thing as promoting heresies and errors that have been unequivocally condemned by the Magisterium.  Meg suffers from SDS, Sedevacantist Derangement Syndrome ... my adaptation of the term TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) ... where she gets immediately "triggered" by anything that remotely hints of sedevacantism.  Matthew has in fact, IMO rightly, banned the dogmatic sedevacantists who harbor a schismatic attitude that their theological conclusions regarding the Crisis demonstrate a severing of membership in the Church.

After the last outcry against poche, I repeatedly requested of poche that he at least explain his motivation for being on a forum like this where he disagrees with the entire membership on our core beliefs.  Where is he coming from and what is his motivation for posting?  Is he an FSSP type, a Motarian, or even a straight left-wing Novus Ordite?  He refused to answer.  Consequently, he must be regarded as a malicious troll who participates in this forum to undermine and sabotage Traditional Catholic core principles.

So it is a grave sin to continue allowing poche to promote his heresies and errors, and so I need to make a public act of dissociating myself from this forum until he has been banned, and also to serve as a reminder regarding the gravity of such errors.  And this is why I felt the need to briefly interrupt my abstention from posting on CI.

I miss the old HIDE/IGNORE Function