Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage  (Read 18835 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sedetrad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1585
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    It's called a marriage contract for a reason.

    How many of you would marry your second or third choice of partner if you had a better option?

    I'm not suggesting that a woman would be wise to focus on worldly things above all else. If she does this she might simply marry a rich cad. What I am saying it that people have a sense of their value and what they can acquire with it.

    A good looking, intelligent, virtuous, modest, pious, young woman has it all going for her and if she is intelligent she knows that she has what many men seek. Since as a Catholic she can only give that to one man it makes sense she choose the man with the best overall attributes.

    A woman with a first class degree in law is unlikely to want to marry a builder or be happy and mentally stimulated married to a builder. A woman who has grown up in a 5 bedroom house with an acre of yard is unlikely to feel happy with her 5 children squeezed into a two bedroom apartment. If her husband is ideal in every other way and she is a saint in training, then I am sure they could cope well, but 99% of people are far from saintly or ideal.

    I know Trad men in their 30s and even late 40s who bemoan not being married but have struggled over the last 10 years to pay their rent or bills. I point out that if they are struggling when they are single because they cannot hold down a job, then how are they going to afford, baby food, diapers, a spare bedroom, higher medical bills, a larger car etc?

    Let's have a little realism here. Being a Traditional Catholic today and having a stable home and some reasonably degree of financial security requires the man to earn enough money to support a non-working wife for a period of at least 20 years while she has their children. Those children need to be fed and watered, doctored and nursed, educated, clothed and occasionally holidayed. They require a certain amount of square feet to live in, bath in, sleep in, play in.

    If nature takes its normal course you are going to have 5 or 6 children on average over a period of 10 to 15 years. The alternative is prolonged periods of abstinence which comes with its own problems and frustrations. I struggle to believe many couples are mutually happy with this "arrangement". I certainly would not be and neither would my wife.

    Rather than bemoaning how the world is not how you'd like it to be one would be better off working out how to make an extra $10-20k per year so that raising your Traditional Catholic family could be slightly easier.

    It's not that difficult to operate a small business or offer some moonlighting service. If with your disciplined Catholic mind, clear thinking and logical brain you cannot work out what the steps are and compete against sex-obsessed, drug-addicted people who believe they are the spawn of monkeys then it does not speak very highly for your belief system.

    Do you need to become a dotcom billionaire? No. You do however need to be able to pay for the basics or family life and a few luxuries now and again, if you want your children to emulate you in the next generation.


    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #1 on: July 10, 2012, 10:13:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I prefer the single life because I can live comfortably and take care of myself without undue stress. I have no desire to get married and work 80 hours a week like my father to provide the above mentioned life for my wife and children. I also prefer to be alone, so that probably helps.


    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #2 on: July 10, 2012, 10:16:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Do you need to become a dotcom billionaire? No. You do however need to be able to pay for the basics or family life and a few luxuries now and again, if you want your children to emulate you in the next generation.


    Is the above true for all times? I wonder about all the impoverished that have had children in earlier times. Most people do not have the mental capacity to be part of the 1 percent of top income earners. Their is a bell curve. 50 percent of people are relatively stupid.

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #3 on: July 10, 2012, 10:18:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Do the bottom 50 percent end up in hell because of their inability to compete in the modern world and make 100 k a year? Should they voluntarily not have children or marry because they are the bottom 50 percent of the IQ range?

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #4 on: July 10, 2012, 10:27:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    A woman with a first class degree in law


    This is what a Catholic man wants?

    ggreg promotes feminist values among Catholics.  His posts tend to revolve around the amount of money he makes, and how every Catholic woman should expect six figures, how a man should even need to be rich to marry an attractive intelligent Catholic girl etc.  He's the kind Trad for characters like +Fellay, Krah, Vox, and for the future society where bastardy will be the norm.  I've already posted before some quotes of his which shows his beliefs cannot be called traditionally Catholic:

    Quote from: ggreg
    When they canonised JP2 I am going to hand my membership badge back in. If God wants me to stay a Roman Catholic then I need JP2 to not be canonised. God has to step in an prevent it. Destroying Rome would achieve this of course as would the Garabandal Miracle and Warning. Who knows, maybe they'll find some real dirt on JP2 which will stop it at the 11th hour.

    I don't think I'll become an SV for several reasons not least that they are trying to preserve a Church that will have fallen into contradiction. Orthodox I'd need to look at closely. The problem with them however is that they are not unified, they are in 31 flavours like Baskin Robbins ice-cream.

    At that stage I'll think I'll read the Gospel from start to finish with a pair of fresh eyes and an honest intention. I still think Jesus was real enough and that the Gospels are a great code for living your life. There are pearls of Wisdom in the Gospel that are either Divinely inspired or way about any morality I could come up with. I'll basically become my own boss for the simple reason that sinner though I am I would not break the first commandment or cover up for paedo-priests. It's dangerous being your own Pope, but when the Pope is making it up as he goes along then it is no more dangerous than following him.

    Frankly for the last 20 years I've had serious reservations about what has been taken from the Gospels and leveraged and what has been ignored and left out. Christianity seems to have been heavily influenced by the emperor Constatine who as far as I understand it wasn't even a converted Christian until his deathbed.

    For example, Jesus seems to make multiple statement that poverty is good and holy and that Christians should seek to have just enough and then give the rest to the poor. Give your coat to a man who needs it and trust in providence.

    Hardly any Christians do this however, myself included and the Church has been pretty quiet on the subject for the last 1500 years, and seems to mostly have sided with the Lords and Nobles and Kings, who were little more than the local warlords and mafia strongmen.

    The only thing I've done is to live a way below my means and give the difference away, but I still eat nice food and have a comfortable live. I've always driven 12 year old cheap cars rather than brand new ones. I get all but my business clothes from charity shops. I've stayed in budget hotels when I could have afforded 5 star hotels. I don't drink much and I don't smoke either.

    I've got major reservations about Traditional Catholicism too. There are some real arseholes in the Traditionalist Camp who lack charity, don't really give a crap about poor, lock themselves into a compound with a sort of bunker mentality (or dream about doing this if they had the money), take a delight in chastizing people over the clothes they wear to mass, or revel in their intellectual superiority. A lot of these asshats can't hold down a full time job and are living at home with their mother until 35 and claiming a welfare check. They ponce around like they are minor nobility. They are no the sort of people I'd want to hang around with. If after all those sacraments, all that prayer and all that grace they turn out like that I tend to wonder whether there is much positive effect from that stuff.

    Conversely I've got friends who are evangelical Christian types, Baptists and Methodists who are very pleasant people to have around. They have good sized families, their children love them, they are always willing to come over and help you paint your house, weed the garden etc. Some of them are models of virtue. This leads me to believe that their lives on earth must be pleasing to God.

    Not all Christians are good or course. Not all Muslims are evil. The observation of my eyes and my 43 years of life on this planet suggests to me that there are good and bad people everywhere. Selfish people who know the Gospel inside out and back to front and kind, charitable, decent and good people who've never got around to reading it.

    I certainly DO have a problem with the idea that 90%+ of people who reach the age of reason are damned to Hell for all eternity. God designed the system. He new what humans were before the fall and understood what their nature would be like after the fall. Any God who creates intelligent beings without asking them first and then damns most of them to hell is to my way of thinking an evil monster.

    Universal salvation is horse####. Clearly Hitler and Stalin went to Hell if one exists. But near universal damnation seems totally unjust to me bearing in mind what I observe in the lives of those people around me.




    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #5 on: July 10, 2012, 10:34:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote

    Conversely I've got friends who are evangelical Christian types, Baptists and Methodists who are very pleasant people to have around. They have good sized families, their children love them, they are always willing to come over and help you paint your house, weed the garden etc. Some of them are models of virtue. This leads me to believe that their lives on earth must be pleasing to God.


    WTF? The above is not Catholic.

    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #6 on: July 10, 2012, 10:36:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What do you hope to accomplish by this thread?

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8212
    • Reputation: +7173/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #7 on: July 10, 2012, 10:36:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That was ridiculous. Posts like this make the criteria for finding a good husband evolve around how much money he has or how good looking he is, when the ultimate thing women should seek in a man is someone who will help them obtain salvation.

    As Tele said, this is mere feministic values being promoted.
    Please ignore ALL of my posts. I was naive during my time posting on this forum and didn’t know any better. I retract and deeply regret any and all uncharitable or erroneous statements I ever made here.


    Offline de Montfort

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 28
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #8 on: July 10, 2012, 10:37:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: sedetrad
    Quote

    Conversely I've got friends who are evangelical Christian types, Baptists and Methodists who are very pleasant people to have around. They have good sized families, their children love them, they are always willing to come over and help you paint your house, weed the garden etc. Some of them are models of virtue. This leads me to believe that their lives on earth must be pleasing to God.


    WTF? The above is not Catholic.


    Neither is using an acronym which stands for vulgar language.

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #9 on: July 10, 2012, 10:40:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: sedetrad
    The above is not Catholic.


    That's not the only thing:

    "It's called a marriage contract for a reason. "

    And of course he means a contract in which he regards money as practically the most important aspect.  Marriage is viewed a wealth transfer from men to women (what about dowries?) - and that intelligent and attractive Catholic women almost invariably want and should expect wealthy husbands.


    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #10 on: July 10, 2012, 10:42:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    What do you hope to accomplish by this thread?


    The point of the thread is to discuss the idea that the ideal trad catholic man should make 100 k in the modern world to be a "proper" Catholic husband for his wife. The above idea is absurd as most people do not have the mental capacity to earn 100k or more a year in the modern world. Gregg is an interesting poster, but some of his insights are not Catholic. Mea Culpa on the swearing.


    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #11 on: July 10, 2012, 10:46:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The idea that a Catholic man might have lost opportunities or sacrificed the opportunity to be wealthy because of his religion never occurs to these people with their grandiose expectations of the wealthy collection plate contributor husband.

    And I'm convinced a certain faction of the SSPX does use the confessional to screen suitors for how much money they can get out of them.

    Money and getting along with the neocons (or greens, or whatever) is what the Zionist lawyer's $$PX is all about.

    Never ever tell anyone in the SSPX your financial status.

    If they think you're well-off, some of these girls parents will fawn over you.  The moment they find out you're don't have what they thought or that you like someone else's daughter they will start to treat you like a freak.

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #12 on: July 10, 2012, 10:47:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My brother makes over 100 k a year as an engineer for the feds. He is 29. Most people are not as intelligent as he is nor should they be. God did not mean for all his children to be engineers. Most people are not endowed with the intelligence to become engineers, medical doctors, or Phd's in non social science fields.

    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #13 on: July 10, 2012, 10:50:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • My family is also relatively connected. People that are not connected cannot hope to attain certain jobs.

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Please comment on this insightful post of greggs on marriage
    « Reply #14 on: July 10, 2012, 10:51:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: sedetrad
    My brother makes over 100 k a year as an engineer for the feds. He is 29. Most people are not as intelligent as he is nor should they be. God did not mean for all his children to be engineers. Most people are not endowed with the intelligence to become engineers, medical doctors, or Phd's in non social science fields.


    And even those who are intelligent are not facing the society that existed 30 years ago.  My brother is going into neurosurgery, but for every situation like that, there's a situation where many intelligent (in particular intelligent gentile men) are being frozen out.

    What if we lived in a society run by freemasons, where the freemasons froze Catholic men out of high paying work?

    What would we say to men who said Catholic men are no good for Catholic women because they don't earn enough, so young Catholic women should marry from among the Freemasons?

    We're approaching a situation now where devout Catholics often have to be very discreet about their beliefs to advance in careers.