Author Topic: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy  (Read 359 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cantarella

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6334
  • Reputation: +3917/-366
  • Gender: Female
Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
« on: November 26, 2017, 01:42:19 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • PET PARENTS; A LEFT-WING FALLACY!

    Pets  are not children. Even if they display affection towards you or even among your own natural children they are still animals! 

    With the outbreak of the 1960’s Sexual Revolution, liberals have been pushing forth this contemporary trend of treating animals as though they were humans. Even going so far as to promote the erroneous, widespread phenomenon known as “pet parents.” We now have nearly five generations of men and women who gladly go along and embrace this feminist ideal by substituting  the precious life of children in replace of their pets. Some are married with children and extend their affection for their pets beyond their role as “pet owner” and continue to refer to their dogs or cats as their "children.” 

    Some of you Trads may own pets as well and share a common bond with them as millions of pet owners do and see nothing wrong with this secular contemporary trend. However, we must inform you that this yet another tragic tactic instituted by liberals who despise children and now use political legislation in the United States, since 1973 to encourage millions of women to barbarically terminate their unborn child in the false name of choice. While they enforce strict laws against anyone whom they feel is exerting the mistreatment of an animal. 

    One such group who is using its influencing in order "humanize" animals are the left-wing  activist organization known such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). Which  serves as an advocate in showing more concern towards the “greater sensitivity” of animals than humans! This group has not only exercised an unusual desire in protecting the life of an animal from existing in its own natural, beastly state but have used every inch of its power in destroying the livelihood of those who utilize animals in their employ including circus owners, horse and carriage owners, fashion designers who specialize in designing fur coats. Even farmers who raise poultry! As a result, we also have a number of individuals who are also assisting this erroneous organization in pushing this pagan admiration for animals by self-identifying as “vegans” or vegetarians, (those who will not consume meat products). 

    After the ACLU, PETA is one of the most dangerous organizations in the United States. As they are utilizing their power and influence by encouraging American citizens and major organizations in adopting their pagan admiration for the love and worship of animals over humans! These people also develop silly documentaries where they are trying to manipulate the public into believing that animals share similar distinctions with humans among their natural habitat. For instance, there are Youtube videos that depict certain animals engaging in "harmonious" relationships with other species. Like scenes capturing bizarre friendships between dogs and cats, polar bears playfully frolicking with snow dogs or a mother lioness nursing a baby tiger cub! All in the unnatural name of "peaceful coexistence!" 

    This is just one of the examples where left wing animal rights activists are trying to create an artificial world among the animal kingdom as yet another example of rebellion against God's social order among living species! Another example of this outrageous fascination towards pets and animals are examples of wealthy and eccentric pet owners who leave the bulk of their entire fortune to the care of their pets. Obviously these people are suffering from some strange disorder where they can no longer make the distinction between the life of an animal as oppose to a human's. 

    Liberals obviously prefer simulation to reality. Where having a pet for them is like a child playing with a doll. It offers the adult a chance to enjoy an activity or a daily ritual of engaging in make-believe parenthood without any of the actual responsibilities or merit of hard work. It's  just an opportunity for an adult to escape the demands of human society. By treating an animal as though it were a human child, liberals are stripping the animal of its natural state of being and purpose.

    These people are trying to encourage millions of Americans in aiding them to help “spread awareness” in stripping an animal of its natural state of life. While in calculated manner, in portraying animals in a “non-beastly” manner. In short, what they are doing is simply rebelling against God’s natural laws by creating a “human aspect” of humanity among the animal kingdom!

    Though animals possess emotions and feelings, the vast majority lack any self-comprehension.  When liberals endorse this ridiculous trend known as “pet parents” or encourage childless American pet owners to “adopt a pet” it is simply a carefully crafted maneuver in “blurring the lines" between humans and animals! They distort the English language as well while inventing silly terms such as “pet parents” “animal adoption” and “therapy for pets”, politically-incorrect terms that were almost unheard nearly  fifty five years ago as an unending rejection of the Traditional Christian social order of society and the animal world. In which they are slowly chipping away at. In replace of a secular utopia where humans and animals engage in shared core, “pagan values!” 

    There are even fashion designers who are now devoting valuable time and effort in servicing the pet population. By being commissioned by a small group of well to-do, pet owning clientele. Who adorn their pets in human attire! You’ve seen some of these characters, who are mostly middle-aged women, who parade around high end boutiques while carrying their pet in a stylized basket and speaking to it as though they were children! “There, there Aldo, mummy will buy you that 40 inch, $2,000 flat screen t.v. just to keep you entertained! “Now wrap it up!” Ugh!

    This is not a gentle delusion for a childless or wealthy pet owner to perceive a pet, be it a dog, a cat or a hamster as his/her child. Nor is it some kind of light hearted affection directed towards animals. It is clearly a retreat from the world! This is a form of abnormal behavior. As is expressed by those irresponsible people who deliberately take a wild animal out of its natural environment while placing them upon their restricted property. At the expense of their neighbors. PETA doesn't see such gravely irresponsible behavior of this manner as a danger to both the individual who selfishly remove the animal from its natural habitat while risking their lives as well as the lives of those who reside among them as an imminent threat or danger to the community.

    Instead they attack anyone, physically or verbally  who dares to adorn themselves in attire made by an animal. Or force food manufacturers in issuing ridiculous  warnings towards the public in rejecting the consumption of  products made from animals! These peole are lunatics plain and simple.

    This is not a genuine expression of “love and affection” for animals but a cruel display of selfish human beings who merely want to project their innate, human nature upon animals and are psychologically expecting them to transmit this very same human attitude upon themselves! Humanity is being affected by the left’s feminization of society in trying to humanize animals. In a diabolical attempt to annul animals and force them to assimilate human characteristics! 

    God did not intend to create His living creatures on earth on the  basis of “equality” and that includes plant life. This leftist obsession in treating animals like children is all part of their secular agenda in promoting the fallacy of “coexistence.” The role of parenting is not for everyone and those who forgo it cannot substitute the joy of rearing children in replace of an animal! If you enjoy owning a pet, love them and care for them but by all means, do not subject your pets to this cruel, left-wing phenomenon of treating them like humans. Because pets don't change. The time you spend with them will always remain the same.

    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6334
    • Reputation: +3917/-366
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
    « Reply #1 on: November 26, 2017, 01:49:57 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline Miseremini

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1268
    • Reputation: +872/-46
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
    « Reply #2 on: November 26, 2017, 03:01:53 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Vets are very guilty of promoting this in their speech to pet owners.
    While taking my little dog to the vet several times in a short period of time to have
    a problem monitored, I was constantly referred to as Mommy.

    Being an old lady, and I tend to be blunt sometimes when irritated,
    I asked her if that meant I was a bitch.

    She never called me Mommy again.
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 20922
    • Reputation: +18521/-86
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
    « Reply #3 on: November 26, 2017, 05:01:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I completely agree with pretty much everything contained in that article.

    However, the grammar and style were utterly atrocious. Is that what passes for professional journalism these days? I lost track of how many sentence fragments the piece contained.
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3388
    • Reputation: +1747/-47
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
    « Reply #4 on: November 26, 2017, 08:59:53 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Vets are very guilty of promoting this in their speech to pet owners.
    While taking my little dog to the vet several times in a short period of time to have
    a problem monitored, I was constantly referred to as Mommy.

    Being an old lady, and I tend to be blunt sometimes when irritated,
    I asked her if that meant I was a bitch.

    She never called me Mommy again.
    PRICELESS !  :jester: :laugh2: :jester: :laugh2: :jester:
    I'll remind my sister of that when she refers to herself as her pup's "mom" 


    Online Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4735
    • Reputation: +2659/-64
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
    « Reply #5 on: November 26, 2017, 11:50:09 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I completely agree with pretty much everything contained in that article.

    However, the grammar and style were utterly atrocious. Is that what passes for professional journalism these days? I lost track of how many sentence fragments the piece contained.
    I think it is written by a schoolchild. Who is the writer, Cantarella? I certainly agree with the sentiments expressed.

    Offline Nick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 94
    • Reputation: +71/-83
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
    « Reply #6 on: November 27, 2017, 07:10:12 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :chef: i'm sure it's been asked before, but doesn't P.E.T.A. stand for People Eating Tasty Animals ?

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4255
    • Reputation: +3631/-203
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
    « Reply #7 on: November 27, 2017, 08:35:35 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • A friend of mine in another city went to a local public hearing about establishing a new "dog park" in the area where people can bring their dogs and let them run around without a leash.  He got up to make a statement and told the people there that what the town needed was a new "kid park" where the neighborhood kids could go to play.  He said people looked at him like he was speaking some unknown foreign language.

    In the end, the tax payers of the community voted to create a new dog park for the neighborhood.  There is still not a park in the area where kids can play (though, in truth, he admitted that his kids would likely be the only ones playing there as there are so few kids around and almost all of them only play indoors).


    Offline Marlelar

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3388
    • Reputation: +1747/-47
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pet Parents : A Left Wing Fallacy
    « Reply #8 on: November 27, 2017, 10:57:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • :chef: i'm sure it's been asked before, but doesn't P.E.T.A. stand for People Eating Tasty Animals ?
    I saw a bumper sticker like that :ready-to-eat:

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16