https://tinyurl.com/89j8pkau
Children don’t have rights. The rights of man is free masonry too.
The laws Of God is for Christians.
I have recently acquired a book called "The Rights of Man" by H.G. Wells (a prominent Fabian socialist), since this book is considered instrumental in the developments that led to the creation of that pathetic screed known as the Declaration of Human Rights. Motivated by this just hatred, I have finished reading the book. I despise Wells' ideology, but I appreciate his honesty in being an antichrist revolutionary.
Here he is implicitly rejecting Our Lady's Peace Plan while describing, in his opinion, what the "War Aims" of Britain should be (keep in mind this book was published in 1940):
We want to bring nαzι aggression to a standstill and admitted defeat...We do not believe it is practical to cut up Germany, and we have not the remotest idea of fighting this religious war between the Vatican and Russia.
(The Rights of Man, 21)
Of his proposed Declaration, the most grievous offenses against the Catholic Faith are his insistence on the "right" of "freedom of conscience" (the "right" to profess heresy and unbelief) and "freedom of speech" (the "right" to blaspheme God and to spread heresy and unbelief, along with immorality). He admits on page 103 that concerning his draft "Many Roman Catholics attack its fundamental ideas ferociously".
Another telling quote:
Plainly I am an extreme revolutionary...These sovereign governments have given us nothing but inconclusive wars on a larger and larger scale, and we have to get rid of them all. All of them. It is not the present German government we are fighting to get rid of; it is any government of that sort, including and most emphatically our own. We have to get rid of and replace these governments by a world system, and that alone is world revolution.
(The Rights of Man, 104)
Note here the insistence on "that alone is world revolution". Wells does not desire a world revolution in the classical Marxist sense, through violent proletarian mobs storming the capitals of the nations, but rather presents here the idea that through introducing a "world system" (the UN) that the nations of the world will gradually be assimilated into a world government.
These speak for themselves:
The ultimate pattern of world government to which human affairs move seems to be a combination of the collectivist ideal, the state socialism of Russia, plus a rigorous insistence upon the Declaration of Rights we have set out here. East is East and West is West, and the sooner they get together the better.
(The Rights of Man, 111)
It has been suggested that one single Declaration of Rights may not be adapted to all occasions. The World State, like the Christian Church, might well have a shorter and a longer creed.
(The Rights of Man, 102)
Such evidence goes to show that current events were long ago planned in advance by men such as him. Perhaps I will review this book, and I think I will, just to show how blatantly contrary to Faith and to history the foundation of the secular humanist ideology expounded by the UN really is. I am moved by a great need in today's world for sound Catholic voices to vigorously oppose this insidious ideology that is so entrenched in the minds of most in our time. My first review will be a sound Catholic work, so not this trash.