Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sound spiritual direction  (Read 681 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ByzCat3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1889
  • Reputation: +500/-141
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound spiritual direction
« Reply #15 on: January 13, 2020, 07:52:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Even in ordinary times I'd wonder, what the limits of spiritual jurisdiction are.

    But its weirder in SSPX type situations because those priests and bishops, by their own admission, don't have ordinary jurisdiction.  So I don't think Bishop Williamson could really order Matthew to do that under pain of sin, and I don't think he'd be obliged to obey (though maybe it would be more prudent to do so, he'd have to decide) if he did.


    Offline donkath

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1517
    • Reputation: +616/-116
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Re: Sound spiritual direction
    « Reply #16 on: January 13, 2020, 09:05:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Even in ordinary times I'd wonder, what the limits of spiritual jurisdiction are.

    But its weirder in SSPX type situations because those priests and bishops, by their own admission, don't have ordinary jurisdiction.  So I don't think Bishop Williamson could really order Matthew to do that under pain of sin, and I don't think he'd be obliged to obey (though maybe it would be more prudent to do so, he'd have to decide) if he did.
    There seems to be general agreement that no priest or bishop, during these times, has any jurisdiction - except in the conciliar church.  So, taking our example here on CI, Matthew would always be able to keep the forum going without being charged with disobedience.
    I appreciate all the comments - thank you all.
    "In His wisdom," says St. Gregory, "almighty God preferred rather to bring good out of evil than never allow evil to occur."