I am really surprised that there are (even three) people on CI that are defending (recreational) use of MJ (for young people), (even their daughters).
This is the epitome of how a woman argues:
1. The above phrases (in parenthesis) have not been argued by anyone on CI, specifically, but LT inserts them into the argument to gain "popular" support, much like the modern media.
2. LT doesn't argue like a man, rationally, but repeatedly inserts ideas and "buzz words" which he knows will cause an emotional agreement with his cause. Another modern media tactic.
3. LT refuses to acknowledge the logic of moral theologians on the issue and also is in capable of distinguishing between 'allowance' and 'encouragement'.
4. etc, etc. One could write a 10 page essay of the lack of logic and rationality in LT's posts. I trust him as much as I trust a novus ordo bishop. He has lost all integrity in my eyes.