Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Oh no...  (Read 1106 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pelly

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 637
  • Reputation: +118/-0
Oh no...
« on: June 27, 2013, 03:02:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It seems like that DOMA is repealed.
    This is bad news for those living in America. What comes next?

    Offline Matto

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5324
    • Reputation: +2911/-110
    • Gender: Male
    Oh no...
    « Reply #1 on: June 27, 2013, 03:26:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Pelly
    What comes next?

    Legalized pedophilia.
    In a Station of the Metro
    The apparition of these faces in the crowd;
    Petals on a wet, black bough.


    Offline d15

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 74
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    Oh no...
    « Reply #2 on: June 27, 2013, 03:35:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matto
    Quote from: Pelly
    What comes next?

    Legalized pedophilia.


    That may be down the road, but I think legalized polygamy is next.

    Offline Frances

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2660
    • Reputation: +2239/-1
    • Gender: Female
    Oh no...
    « Reply #3 on: June 27, 2013, 09:06:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 1.  A Constitutional Amendment legalizing "gay" marriage.
    2.  Polygamy
    3.  Forced abortion and sterilization
    4.  Polyandry
    5. Group marriages of all genders
    6.  Pedophilia including "marriages"
    7.  Beastiality including "marriages"


     St. Francis Xavier threw a Crucifix into the sea, at once calming the waves.  Upon reaching the shore, the Crucifix was returned to him by a crab with a curious cross pattern on its shell.  

    Offline Tiffany

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3111
    • Reputation: +1639/-9
    • Gender: Female
    Oh no...
    « Reply #4 on: June 27, 2013, 10:00:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Polygamy won't be legal here. The whole FLDS case was done to force the men into admitting bigamy.


    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 13935
    • Reputation: +506/-1142
    • Gender: Male
    Oh no...
    « Reply #5 on: June 30, 2013, 03:14:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is ome on the overturning of DOMA;

    This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and dismissed an appeal of California’s Proposition 8 on grounds of standing. But what does this mean? What are the implications of the court decisions? Here’s the good, the bad and the ugly from today’s rulings:

    The Good:
    The court did not claim to have discovered a fundamental “right” to marry. If it had done so, it could have imposed a redefinition of marriage on the entire country, forcing widespread recognition of “gay marriage.” Instead, the court chose to issue a more limited ruling, saying in its DOMA decision that the states are free to define marriage as they see fit, but if they choose to recognize same-sex “marriage,” the federal government must acknowledge these “marriages” alongside the marriages of one man and one woman. States are still free to hold a view of marriage as one man, one woman if they choose to do so. This is a silver lining on a court decision that could have been absolutely devastating.

    The Bad:
    Overturning DOMA means that the federal government will recognize “gay marriage” in the states that allow it. This will affect more than 1,000 regulations and legal provisions, and could have a sweeping impact on both the legal and cultural understanding of what marriage is. And by dismissing Prop 8, the court is allowing a lower ruling to stand, paving the way for “gay marriage” in California. In addition, since the federal government must acknowledge all state-recognized marriages, there will be increased pressure on the states to redefine marriage.

    The Ugly:
    The majority opinion in DOMA makes the claim that those who support the law do so in order to “disparage,” “injure,” “degrade,” “demean” and “humiliate” gay individuals. This is very bad news for those who defend marriage not out of animus or hatred but because they believe that marriage is rooted in divine and natural law and is not ours to redefine. As Justice Scalia explained in a scathing dissent, the court today has declared those who oppose a redefinition of marriage to be “enemies of the human race.” Supporters of marriage as it has been understood by virtually every society throughout human history need to be prepared for social persecution, since even the nation’s high court now assumes that defending marriage is based on hatred and bigotry rather than a natural understanding of the sacred purpose of human sexuality. Defenders of marriage may find that their rights to voice their beliefs and live according to them are quickly eroding after this court decision.

    http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/blog/understanding-the-gay-marriage-ruling/

    Offline alaric

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1652
    • Reputation: +1482/-29
    • Gender: Male
    Oh no...
    « Reply #6 on: June 30, 2013, 09:24:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Tiffany
    Polygamy won't be legal here. The whole FLDS case was done to force the men into admitting bigamy.
    Nah, we just have Adultery.

    I like the way women are so critical of men having multiple wives, yet they have no problem with a country full of whores bedding down and breeding with muliple men creating a nation of bastards that would make the worst thrid world craphole blush with embarrassment.

    Yea, men lying with men no problem, but multiple wives. heaven forbid! :rolleyes:

    (Actually heaven didn't forbid, read you O.T.)

    Offline Traditional Guy 20

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3427
    • Reputation: +1660/-45
    • Gender: Male
    Oh no...
    « Reply #7 on: June 30, 2013, 11:31:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: alaric
    Nah, we just have Adultery.

    I like the way women are so critical of men having multiple wives, yet they have no problem with a country full of whores bedding down and breeding with muliple men creating a nation of bastards that would make the worst thrid world craphole blush with embarrassment.

    Yea, men lying with men no problem, but multiple wives. heaven forbid! :rolleyes:

    (Actually heaven didn't forbid, read you O.T.)


    alaric for the record I am one of the strongest critics of homosexuality, but from a Christian standpoint marriage is between one man and one woman so we must reject the Muslim value of polygamy.

    Make no mistake however in Europe right now Arabs, Africans, and Turks are taking over in hordes.



    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3820
    • Reputation: +2658/-2
    • Gender: Female
    Oh no...
    « Reply #8 on: June 30, 2013, 01:40:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You know what'll come next? A flood of immigrants. A bunch of people that want US citizenship... maybe businessmen that "marry" a guy, and bring him over here so he can get benefits too. They won't really even be interested in each other, it'll be a business transaction.

    Essentially though, this has been left up to the states to decide. The Supreme Court didn't give gays a right to marry. Only gave the residents of states that extend gay marriage to gays the right to receive benefits for their "partner."

    As far as the California case, the Californians that were supposed to be defending their law, didn't, and a third party group stepped in. The Supreme Court said, "No you can't do that, only the state can plead the case." They didn't decide either way on that case, just that the people bringing forward the suit didn't have a basis, and only the state could be the plaintiff.

    So really they didn't decide anything, other than the states that already have "gay marriage" must have the federal government extend their benefits to their partners.
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16