Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Official Church 'Dispensation' for Eating at Restaurants on Sundays?  (Read 14013 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Angelus

  • Supporter
Re: Official Church 'Dispensation' for Eating at Restaurants on Sundays?
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2024, 09:43:56 PM »
THE MORAL THEOLOGY
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/35354/pg35354-images.html

2579. Servile Works.—The prohibitory part of the precept is concerned with servile works, that is, labor of a kind that tends to make one unfit for devotion or that shows disrespect for the sacredness of the day, even though the labor be done gratis, or for recreation, or out of devotion. Hence, the law forbids:

(a) works given to the service of the devil, that is, sins that deprive one of holiness, such as riotous recreations, gambling, drunkenness, reading improper matter, and attendance at evil movie performances. But these works are opposed to the end, not to the text, of the law; and hence the circuмstance of time aggravates their malice but does not give them a new species (see 2314);
(b) works given to the service of the body (servile works properly so called) or to the service of external goods (forensic and commercial works). Servile works in the strict sense cause bodily fatigue and are taken up with material things, and hence they distract the mind from religious thoughts. Such are manual labors (e.g., plowing, digging, housecleaning) and mechanical or industrial labors (e.g., printing, building, plastering, shoemaking). Forensic and commercial labors (e.g., arguing in court, auctioneering) are also of a very worldly kind and unsuitable for the quiet and recollection of Sundays and holydays.
2580. The prohibitory part of the Sunday precept does not affect works which are no impediment to devotion and which cast no dishonor on the day. Such are:
(a) works devoted immediately to the service of God. The purpose of the law is to allow leisure for these works, and hence manifestly their performance is not forbidden. Such works are saying Mass, preaching, administering the Sacraments, singing in church, and visiting the poor and sick (John, vii. 23; Matt., xii. 5). But works that are only remotely related to divine worship (e.g., cleaning the church, painting the altar, repairing the vestments, decorating the shrines) should not be done on Sunday without necessity;
(b) works devoted to the service of the mind (liberal works). These works are of a more elevated kind, do not require great bodily exertion, and are not looked upon as unsuitable to the Sabbath. Such are intellectual works (e.g., teaching, reading, writing, studying), artistic works (e.g., playing the organ, singing, drawing, painting a picture, embroidering), and works of recreation (moderate sports or diversions such as baseball, tennis, and chess).
2581. Other Kinds of Works and Sunday Observance.—(a) Common works are those that stand between the liberal and the servile, since they are exercised equally by mind and body, such as walking, riding, hunting, and fishing that is not very laborious. These are lawful.
(b) Doubtful works are those that are now non-servile, now servile, according to the manner in which they are conducted, such as the work of painters, sculptors, typists, seamstresses, and photographers. Thus, it is a liberal work to paint a portrait, a servile work to paint the walls of a house. In settling the character of various kinds of work, one must be guided by the prudent opinion of one’s locality, and in case of doubt and need must seek a dispensation. (For a history of the theology of servile works see Franz X. Pettirsch, S.J., “A Theology of Sunday Rest,” _Theology Digest_, Vol. VI, no. 2, Spring 1958, pp. 114 ff.; for a survey of modern studies on the problem see _Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America_, 1957).

2582. Is it lawful without necessity to hire the servile work of non-Catholics on Sunday, if these persons are not thereby impeded from the natural duty of worshipping God and no scandal is given? (a) If the non-Catholics are infidels and not bound by church laws, this is lawful. The same would be true of those who lack the use of reason (see 427 sqq.). (b) If the non-Catholics are heretics, it is not lawful in the case given to make them work on Sunday.



CATECHISM OF TRENT
https://www.saintsbooks.net/books/The%20Roman%20Catechism.pdf


"Six Days Shalt Thou Labour And Do All Thy Work"

And as the observance of the precept is very strongly assisted by these words: Six days shalt thou labour, but on the seventh day is the sabbath of God, the pastor should therefore carefully explain them to the people. For from these words it can be gathered that the faithful are to be exhorted not to spend their lives in indolence and sloth, but that each one, mindful of the words of the Apostle, should do his own business, and work with his own hands, as he had commanded them.

These words also enjoin as a duty commanded by God that in six days we do all our works, lest we defer to a festival what should have been done during the other days of the week, thereby distracting the attention from the things of God.

Third Part of this Commandment
The third part of the Commandment comes next to be explained. It points out, to a certain extent, the manner in which we are to keep holy the Sabbath day, and explains particularly what we are forbidden to do on that day.

Works Forbidden
Thou shalt do no work on it, says the Lord, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy beast, nor the stranger that is within thy gates.

These words teach us, in the first place, to avoid whatever may interfere with the worship of God. Hence it is not difficult to perceive that all servile works are forbidden, not because they are improper or evil in themselves, but because they withdraw the attention from the worship of God, which is the great end of the Commandment.

The faithful should be still more careful to avoid sin, which not only withdraws the mind from the contemplation of divine things, but entirely alienates us from the love of God.

Works Permitted
But whatever regards the celebration of divine worship, such as the decoration of the altar or church on occasion of some festival, and the like, although servile works, are not prohibited; and hence our Lord says: The priests in the temple break the sabbath, and are without blame.

Neither are we to suppose that this Commandment forbids attention to those things on a feast day, which, if neglected, will be lost; for this is expressly permitted by the sacred canons.

There are many other things which our Lord in the Gospel declares lawful on festivals and which may be seen by the pastor in St. Matthew and St. John.

Why Animals Are Not To Be Employed On The Sabbath
To omit nothing that may interfere with the sanctification of the Sabbath, the Commandment mentions beasts of burden, because their use will prevent its due observance. If beasts be employed on the Sabbath, human labor also becomes necessary to direct them; for they do not labor alone, but assist the labours of man. Now it is not lawful for man to work on that day. Hence it is not lawful for the animals to work which man uses.

But the Commandment has also another purpose. For if God commands the exemption of cattle from labor on the Sabbath, still more imperative is the obligation to avoid all acts of inhumanity towards servants, or others whose labor and industry we employ.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Official Church 'Dispensation' for Eating at Restaurants on Sundays?
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2024, 09:48:59 PM »
I've wondered about this myself, though I refuse to develop a scruple over it.

When you prepare meals at home, it is just one person (or more than one) preparing, usually, a single meal, and the various kitchen appliances do most of the "work", cooking, baking, heating, and so on.  We are surely not expected to go hungry on Sundays, or only to eat cold or pre-cooked food.  (Much of Jєωιѕн shabbos preparation revolves around cooking all the food before Friday evening, and finding ways to keep it warm for 24 hours without lighting fires or doing work involving creation of something new, hence dishes such as cholent and innovative kitchen appliances such as the blech, a metal sheet that fits over the range top and diffuses heat created before sundown on Friday.)

As to restaurants, OTOH, someone is working an eight-hour shift (or more), and is working all day to prepare food to order for guests, keep a buffet stocked, and so on.  Again, I refuse to develop a scruple over this, but it is servile work, and one could debate back and forth whether it is "necessary" because people have to eat, and it takes work off whomever would otherwise prepare a meal at home.  I'm willing to settle the doubt in favor of enjoying a simple restaurant meal that requires minimal work from anyone (but I cannot afford to eat out all that much), and to be at peace with the matter.  I would look to responsible traditional Catholic priests to weigh in on this, using principles of moral theology such as may be found in Jone, McHugh and Callan, and so on.  There is also local custom to consider.

It's impossible to know whether the individual serving your meals is justified in putting in the labor.  Some people need the extra income to support their families, which scenario would permit them to work on Sundays.  I've never known a Traditional Catholic priest who opined that it's sinful to eat at a restaurant on Sundays.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Official Church 'Dispensation' for Eating at Restaurants on Sundays?
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2024, 09:53:38 PM »
These are a couple of the best talks out there on the subject ...




Re: Official Church 'Dispensation' for Eating at Restaurants on Sundays?
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2024, 10:22:39 AM »
It's impossible to know whether the individual serving your meals is justified in putting in the labor.  Some people need the extra income to support their families, which scenario would permit them to work on Sundays.  I've never known a Traditional Catholic priest who opined that it's sinful to eat at a restaurant on Sundays.

I have to think that relatively few people get into food service as their highest and best choice.  A lot of people have to take whatever job they can get, and accept whatever hours their boss mandates.

I'd settle the doubt in favor of those people needing their jobs, and not being free to refuse Sunday work if the restaurant is open on that day (and most are).  If Sunday work is required as a condition of their being able to work at a job they need, then I have to think it becomes "necessary servile work" due to that fact.  A lot of people work in food service because that's the only job they can do, it requires no education (trained chefs would be another matter), and it's a fairly easy job to get.  I know of someone who has a prison record (for a non-violent crime of larceny) and is the manager of a chain restaurant.  I'd say she has to work on Sundays (pretty sure she's Catholic). She's done a fine job of straightening her life out, and I admire her for that.

Offline Steve

  • Supporter
Re: Official Church 'Dispensation' for Eating at Restaurants on Sundays?
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2024, 12:10:21 PM »
I have to think that relatively few people get into food service as their highest and best choice.  A lot of people have to take whatever job they can get, and accept whatever hours their boss mandates.

I'd settle the doubt in favor of those people needing their jobs, and not being free to refuse Sunday work if the restaurant is open on that day (and most are).  If Sunday work is required as a condition of their being able to work at a job they need, then I have to think it becomes "necessary servile work" due to that fact.  A lot of people work in food service because that's the only job they can do, it requires no education (trained chefs would be another matter), and it's a fairly easy job to get.  I know of someone who has a prison record (for a non-violent crime of larceny) and is the manager of a chain restaurant.  I'd say she has to work on Sundays (pretty sure she's Catholic). She's done a fine job of straightening her life out, and I admire her for that.
Okay, I think between Ladislaus' abt inability to tell (in doubtful things, liberty), and this in re restaurant work generally not a preferred choice for most, I think I'm satisfied.

But I'm not sorry I inquired abt it so at least - with the generous help of other sincere Catholics - I have thought it through.  I think I will be okay eating out on the occasional Sunday, but moderate my use of this generally and not make it an ollie-ollie-oxen-free kind of thing.

Thank you all for your help!