Br. Bugnolo really does put up some very questionable content. And I think his overt sympathies with schismatic Orthos and softness on God's former chosen people is indelibly linked with his parroting of the tired (disinformation) phrases 'we need to fight this fascist tyranny' and that we must prepare a Nuremberg Trials 2.0.
And as for the jabs being used as a direct culling tool that will lead to mass deaths over the next two winters? I don't believe it at all. I suspect they will sterilize and create severe chronic illness that will gradually pare down global populations but we won't see this imminent Mad Max scenario.
First, the supposed medical professionals hypothesising the mass culling event tend to give off NEW AGE and crazy cat lady vibes - and what is to say they are not functioning as disinfo agents similar to those doctors pushing the actual Covidian tyranny? Could be a false dialectic.
Secondly, from the globalists' perspective an immediate mass culling event over the course of a couple of years - as opposed to gradual depopulation through sterilisation and illness - makes no sense. It would create complete anarchy, with zero law and order, with those surviving being primarily hard line dissidents who have a score to settle and have the opportunity to do so. From a strategic viewpoint such a move would collapse their control grid and put them in direct danger of being brought to justice.
Well said. I agree with all points.
Especially the last one. If they really had a mass death event planned in the next year, the collapse would be too sudden for our civilization to adapt. And with all due respect to the people skills and wealth of the Red Sea Pedestrians, they don't have THAT much of an edge over the common man, if we all went back to the Law of the Jungle next week. Considering what advantages they have over us today, and that those advantages would disappear and even go into the negatives (we have numbers, they don't, we are more likely to know how to build/grow/fix things than they are, etc.) It doesn't make any sense for them to go that route. Their wealth and power would evaporate overnight if there was a full collapse.
And yes, 1 in 3 people dying would bring a full collapse. Actually, even just 1 in 10 people dying would achieve that as well. Once the shelves go empty nationwide, it sets off a chain of events (desperation, rioting, destruction of more infrastructure, mass starvation, freezing in winter, dehydration in summer, lack of clean water, lack of sanitation causing disease, etc.) that ends with Mad Max.
Remember the famous quote: "There are only nine meals between mankind and anarchy."*Yes Mark Zuckerberg's wealth dwarfs my own wealth. But how would he do in a 1v1 fight with me? I think it would be much closer. These guys are ultra-wealthy, not martial artists, survivalists, or ninjas. Their ONLY advantage over the average joe is their wealth, bringing a certain amount of power. And maybe some people/wealth-building skills. That's it.
*In 1906, Alfred Henry Lewis stated, “There are only nine meals between mankind and anarchy.” Since then, his observation has been echoed by people as disparate as Robert Heinlein and Leon Trotsky. The key here is that, unlike all other commodities, food is the one essential that cannot be postponed.