What do you mean by "new"?  The Mass has been tampered with starting in the mid-50's right through today.  I don't remember how many changes B16 made after issuing his motu but I'm sure someone on here will know.

Marsha

Yes, I know what you're refering to.

There was supposed to be a "revised 1962 Missal", but it's looking as if that won't happen just yet.

However, Francis reportedly has a desire to change the liturgy, so we could see something similar - or even worse - soon.

To answer your question, because it is not the True Mass but a hybrid Mass that is meant to please both the Novus Ordites and (neo) Traditionalists, you have no obligation to accept it or attend it.

As long as Rome is full of modernists, I think you'll be waiting a long time for a new order of mass that has 'nothing inherently wrong with it.'  

Quote from: s2srea

I'm of the belief that we may one day see the dawn of a new "Latin Mass", or new Tridentine mass. What are we, who are not of the sedevecantist mindset, to do if this new mass is created by a Pope if it has nothing in it inherently wrong? Would the fact that it is not a part of Tradition be reason enough to reject it?

I think that those of you who are "not of the sedevacantist mindset" should accept the mind and will of your current Holy Father [sic].  At this time, that means using the 1962 Missal with the changes made by Benedict 16--that is, as long as Francis allows it, then, of course, they should humbly abandon what they mistakenly view as tradition.  Those who are convinced Francis is the pope should do what he commands personally or through the Curia.  Right now, that means doing as you're doing now.  Whether or not things will change, only time will tell.

TKGS certainly has a very solid point but we don't know yet how Pope Francis I wants mass to be celebrated...  

...he may make us miss the days of Benedict XVI.

Quote from: s2srea

I'm of the belief that we may one day see the dawn of a new "Latin Mass", or new Tridentine mass. What are we, who are not of the sedevecantist mindset, to do if this new mass is created by a Pope if it has nothing in it inherently wrong? Would the fact that it is not a part of Tradition be reason enough to reject it?

I think that those of you who are "not of the sedevacantist mindset" should accept the mind and will of your current Holy Father [sic].  At this time, that means using the 1962 Missal with the changes made by Benedict 16--that is, as long as Francis allows it, then, of course, they should humbly abandon what they mistakenly view as tradition.  Those who are convinced Francis is the pope should do what he commands personally or through the Curia.  Right now, that means doing as you're doing now.  Whether or not things will change, only time will tell.

If he asks Catholics to do something that is a sin or goes against Tradition/Church teaching, no one is obliged to obey him whether they accept him as Pope or not.

Quote from: s2srea

I'm of the belief that we may one day see the dawn of a new "Latin Mass", or new Tridentine mass. What are we, who are not of the sedevecantist mindset, to do if this new mass is created by a Pope if it has nothing in it inherently wrong? Would the fact that it is not a part of Tradition be reason enough to reject it?

I think that those of you who are "not of the sedevacantist mindset" should accept the mind and will of your current Holy Father [sic].  At this time, that means using the 1962 Missal with the changes made by Benedict 16--that is, as long as Francis allows it, then, of course, they should humbly abandon what they mistakenly view as tradition.  Those who are convinced Francis is the pope should do what he commands personally or through the Curia.  Right now, that means doing as you're doing now.  Whether or not things will change, only time will tell.

TKGS, I am sure you are not advocating what you are actually saying. You certainly do not want "those who are convinced Francis is the pope should do what he commands personally or through the Curia" when those commands would lead their soul into perdition.

The Constitution cuм ex Apostolatus Officio  teaches: "the Roman Pontiff,who is the representative upon earth of God and our God and Lord Jesus Christ, who holds the fulness of power over peoples and kingdoms, who may judge all and be judged by none in this world, may nonetheless be contradicted if he be found to have deviated from the Faith."

It even warns us that the further the pope deviates away from the faith, "the  more fully and more diligently he is to be counteracted".

Whether he is pope or not, telling anyone to follow him to their own perdition is flat out bad advice.

The only Mass we are bound to until time ends, is that one Holy Sacrifice which, being safeguarded by the Holy Ghost from the possibility of error as declared at Trent, is the Mass of Quo Primum. There simply will never be any other hybrid concoction the pope or any man or any group of men can innovate that will bind us to do anything other than the avoidance thereof.

I wonder if a compromised SSPX would accept a New Latin Mass.