Author Topic: National sɛҳuąƖity Education Standards of the Future of Sex Education (Read 858 times)

Geremia · « **on:** August 02, 2014, 12:20:59 AM »

Why is Common Core bad? Because it will soon implement the National sɛҳuąƖity Education Standards of the Future of Sex Education organization (or something like it under a different name)!

See also this:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/s1OuDns8rmI[/youtube]

Geremia · « **Reply #1 on:** August 02, 2014, 12:40:08 AM »

This comes from the PDF linked on the site I linked to in the OP:

Quote

The National sɛҳuąƖity Education Standards were further informed by the work of the CDC’s Health Education Curriculum Analysis Tool (HECAT); existing state and international education standards that include sɛҳuąƖ health content; the Guidelines for Comprehensive sɛҳuąƖity Education: Kindergarten – 12th Grade; and the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics, recently adopted by most states.

What does this have to do with English and math‽ Just as they're relativizing math, so also are they relativizing sɛҳuąƖity.

Listen also to this:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/s1OuDns8rmI[/youtube]
They make a very good point that the whole goal of Common Core is to relativize truth: sex is relative, gender is relative, etc.

Quote from: Pope Pius XI, Divini Illius Magistri

Another very grave danger is that naturalism which nowadays invades the field of education in that most delicate matter of purity of morals. Far too common is the error of those who with dangerous assurance and under an ugly term propagate a so-called sex-education, falsely imagining they can forearm youths against the dangers of sensuality by means purely natural, such as a foolhardy initiation and precautionary instruction for all indiscriminately, even in public; and, worse still, by exposing them at an early age to the occasions, in order to accustom them, so it is argued, and as it were to harden them against such dangers.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #2 on:** August 02, 2014, 09:20:54 AM »

And per EWTN it's in the NO Catholic Schools.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #3 on:** August 02, 2014, 09:31:40 AM »

Many bishops remained silent and indifferent to the sins of premarital sex, abortion, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity and incest, same sex marriage. In fact there are many who secretly
Support Sin. They are the wolves in sheep clothing because they work the devil and are so twisted and evil. And they invite the Devil into our churches.

Tiffany · « **Reply #4 on:** August 02, 2014, 03:55:58 PM »

NO & SIECUS have been bedfellows for decades.

Geremia · « **Reply #5 on:** August 02, 2014, 11:07:19 PM »

Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey

And per EWTN it's in the NO Catholic Schools.

The "sex ed" standards? Do you have a more specific source for this? thanks

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #6 on:** August 06, 2014, 10:16:32 PM »

Quote from: Geremia

This comes from the PDF linked on the site I linked to in the OP:
Quote
The National sɛҳuąƖity Education Standards were further informed by the work of the CDC’s Health Education Curriculum Analysis Tool (HECAT); existing state and international education standards that include sɛҳuąƖ health content; the Guidelines for Comprehensive sɛҳuąƖity Education: Kindergarten – 12th Grade; and the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics, recently adopted by most states.
What does this have to do with English and math‽ Just as they're relativizing math, so also are they relativizing sɛҳuąƖity.

Listen also to this:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/s1OuDns8rmI[/youtube]
They make a very good point that the whole goal of Common Core is to relativize truth: sex is relative, gender is relative, etc.

Quote from: Pope Pius XI, Divini Illius Magistri
Another very grave danger is that naturalism which nowadays invades the field of education in that most delicate matter of purity of morals. Far too common is the error of those who with dangerous assurance and under an ugly term propagate a so-called sex-education, falsely imagining they can forearm youths against the dangers of sensuality by means purely natural, such as a foolhardy initiation and precautionary instruction for all indiscriminately, even in public; and, worse still, by exposing them at an early age to the occasions, in order to accustom them, so it is argued, and as it were to harden them against such dangers.

As more and more male and now female teachers are raping and molesting there students.
And yet the kids can't read or write.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #7 on:** August 06, 2014, 10:17:39 PM »

Sex identity was used in children on the boarder.