Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Modesty and how to dress  (Read 40724 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Modesty and how to dress
« Reply #35 on: August 09, 2010, 02:50:41 AM »
Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote from: clare
It's still illogical.

Skirts must reach below the knees. They needn't reach the ankles.


But why shouldn't they reach the ankles?


I didn't say they must not reach the ankles! Most of my skirts do.


Modesty and how to dress
« Reply #36 on: August 09, 2010, 02:53:30 AM »
Quote from: Caminus
"We recall that a dress cannot be called decent which is cut deeper than two fingers breadth under the pit of the throat, which does not cover the arms at least to the elbows, and scarcely reaches a bit beyond the knee."

How many ladies are there in SSPX chapels who have failed to grasp the urgency of this message?  How many graces are being lost because of negligent disregard?  


I've mentioned this before: Marie Antoinette (and presumably other ladies of her day) did not grasp the message about low necklines.



Modesty and how to dress
« Reply #37 on: August 09, 2010, 12:02:23 PM »
Quote from: clare
Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote from: clare
It's still illogical.

Skirts must reach below the knees. They needn't reach the ankles.


But why shouldn't they reach the ankles?


I didn't say they must not reach the ankles! Most of my skirts do.



Well, my question is, why is their such resistance to covering the calfs, shins, and feet? (many do not have skirts that long) It might be practical not to have a skirt dragging, other than that, what is the reason for exposing the calfs and feet?

What is the reason for decolletage?  Obviously it can only be excused by conformity with prevailing fashions, but are there really good reasons for it?  There only seem to be excuses for it, not good reasons recommending it.

Modesty and how to dress
« Reply #38 on: August 10, 2010, 08:12:48 AM »
Re: Marie Antoinette.  I think that just like in our times, there are people who are more motivated by following fashion than being modest and thus you can find innumerable images/paintings of these.  I've read that Marie Antoinette was a flightly, vain young girl, but as she grew older she became more serious and devout.  Maybe there are paintings of her older that reflect that change, likely shown by a more modest neckline.

As far as the resistance to longer skirts, I can only speak for myself and say that it's a matter of degree and wearing something so long is more extreme and therefore more noticeable out in public.  Many of us don't like feeling exposed to public scrutiny and don't want to be thought of as "weird."

Plus, sometimes finding flattering skirts of that length and shoes to go with them is not easy.   And then some of us, like myself have H who aren't exactly on the same page about what is appropriate and modest for a Catholic woman in the 21st century ... and you get this resistance.

As far as the matter of degree goes, it seems reasonable to have skirts below the knee, long enough so that your knee is covered when sitting ... and the skirt should be loose and flowing so as not to outline the figure.


Modesty and how to dress
« Reply #39 on: August 10, 2010, 09:33:05 AM »
Well no matter what I wear I still look like the actor who played in Sling Blade.

I have photographic proof of this.