The only real problem I have with what's been posted so far is this:
"Simply stated, the man should provide the necessities. This means food, clothing, and a shelter, plus a few comforts and conveniences.... Through all generations of time it has been recognized that when a man marries, his wife and children are entitled to his financial support. Failure to meet this obligation has been just cause for divorce, and even after the marriage separation, a man is still under financial obligation. Financial support and, along with this, fidelity have always been the two main entitlements for a woman in marriage. But whether these laws remain in force or not, the moral and sacred obligation is just as binding, the need just as great."
There is no such thing as a "just cause for divorce", as God hates divorce.
Also, when it comes to children being entitled to financial support, I think it should be noted that whatever support the children are entitled to is not permanent. Once they reach adulthood, the father certainly is not obliged to provide for them any longer, although he could.