Subordination, however, does not necessarily mean inferiority.  So, for instance, Our Lord was subject to St. Joseph and Our Lady, and Our Lady to St. Joseph ... and so the order was actually inverted vis-a-vis their dignity.  Some women can be superior to some men in virtue.  Some women can be more intelligent than some men.  Some women can even be physically stronger than some men. 

Of course you know my take on it, Jaynek.  I find a half dozen or so of these men at every Traditional chapel I've been too.  I've been to many over the years since I cut loose from SSPX seminary.

I guess that misogyny needs to be defined, right?

So, for instance, modern liberals would consider it misogynist to simply state that wives should obey their husbands.

So we need to define misogyny before we can have a rational discussion about it.

I see it manifested in the attitude that some men have that women, and their wives in particular, are somehow lesser human beings.  They justify this attitude with subjection theology, i.e. the correct notion that wives are subject to their husbands and subordinate to them.

Subordination, however, does not necessarily mean inferiority.  So, for instance, Our Lord was subject to St. Joseph and Our Lady, and Our Lady to St. Joseph ... and so the order was actually inverted vis-a-vis their dignity.  Some women can be superior to some men in virtue.  Some women can be more intelligent than some men.  Some women can even be physically stronger than some men.  Misogynist men can feel threatened and insecure about this, so they find other ways to put women down.  Also, some men feel dominated by women when they have issues with purity.  Because they are dominated by their passions, and the women causes these passions, they perceive this as being dominated by women.

Not only do these types regularly quote the passage about how wives should be subject to their husbands and how women should keep silent, but they talk down to their wives in very derogatory language.  They have double standards they impose on their wives to which they themselves don't adhere.  They can be downright cruel and don't care about their wives' feelings or overall well-being.

Being cruel and uncaring doesn't necessarily by itself mean misogyny.  You could just be an a--hole.  But when this a--hole behavior towards women is justified in principle using theology, then it bleeds over into misogyny.  It's a PRINCIPLED acting like a--holes to women, treating them as their inferiors, as their servants/slaves, almost like people who exist for no other reason than to please them and to serve them, having no dignity on their own apart from their husband.

You're just failing to make the appropriate distinction ... as per usual.

Before laying it out, let me ask you:

Is Our Blessed Mother inferior to me?  I thought, at first, to say St. Joseph, but then thought, let's take it another step.  In fact, is Our Lady inferior the most depraved male Satanist serial killer who ever lived?

Your twisting of words is why we don't have many; the most charitable take here is that you don't adequately attend to the words used, and not that you're just a habitual liar.

" " yourself.