Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Mel on Joe Rogan  (Read 28664 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline josefamenendez

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5581
  • Reputation: +4192/-291
  • Gender: Female
Mel on Joe Rogan
« on: January 10, 2025, 06:42:50 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0


  • if you have the time , Mel is great.. 
    Vatican ll
    Fenbendazole and Ivermectin
    Alternative health 
    The shroud 
    Fires , etc

    Warning -Language and secular humor

    https://youtu.be/1rYtrS5IbrQ?si=-T_V9GKB9h8Og46H

     



    Offline josefamenendez

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5581
    • Reputation: +4192/-291
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #1 on: January 10, 2025, 07:10:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Offline MaterDominici

    • Mod
    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 5665
    • Reputation: +4418/-109
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #2 on: January 10, 2025, 08:41:28 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • He lost his LA home in the fire.

    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1033
    • Reputation: +883/-230
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #3 on: January 10, 2025, 09:03:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He lost his LA home in the fire.

    so strange.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12783
    • Reputation: +8139/-2505
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #4 on: January 10, 2025, 09:19:20 AM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!2
  • So there are cars that are so burned, they look like a very old and used metal firepit.  But there's still trees, unburned, in the middle of everything?  Makes no sense.  More proof these are not normal fires.


    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47342
    • Reputation: +28019/-5237
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #5 on: January 10, 2025, 09:53:18 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • He lost his LA home in the fire.

    Right, it burned WHILE he was filiming the Rogan show ...
    https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1877707445541175785

    Offline MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 836
    • Reputation: +359/-143
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #6 on: January 10, 2025, 10:19:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Joe Rogan is asking some interesting questions -

    Gibson: “...we’ve got a pope that brought a South American idol into the church to worship.”
    Rogan: “Really?”
    Gibson: “He did, the Pachamama.”
    Rogan: “Why would he do that?”
    Gibson: “Good question. But he did.  If that’s his contention...”
    Rogan: “Then he shouldn’t be the pope. How can you be the pope if you say ‘all religions are just as good?'”

    Nice one, Joe.  Good questions.


    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1033
    • Reputation: +883/-230
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #7 on: January 10, 2025, 10:35:46 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Joe Rogan is asking some interesting questions -

    Gibson: “...we’ve got a pope that brought a South American idol into the church to worship.”
    Rogan: “Really?”
    Gibson: “He did, the Pachamama.”
    Rogan: “Why would he do that?”
    Gibson: “Good question. But he did.  If that’s his contention...”
    Rogan: “Then he shouldn’t be the pope. How can you be the pope if you say ‘all religions are just as good?'”

    Nice one, Joe.  Good questions.
    Gibson saying good question as to why? lol seriously?

    Why did JP2 do it in 1988? Does Gibson know how free masonic the US is? Or.. that is was started by anti-Catholic free masons? Where does this guy really stand, I'd like to know.


    Offline St Giles

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1631
    • Reputation: +847/-198
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #8 on: January 10, 2025, 10:40:30 AM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!0
  • So there are cars that are so burned, they look like a very old and used metal firepit.  But there's still trees, unburned, in the middle of everything?  Makes no sense.  More proof these are not normal fires.
    Have you every tried to burn a live tree? It's not easy. They are full of water, and are designed to be fire resistant. No doubt they will show signs of fire damage due to cells dying from getting too hot, though not hot enough to scorch. Houses on the other hand are made of extremely dry low density wood and petroleum products. They will burn much more readily and quickly, and if they had brick walls, those walls will have been a barrier to help protect the trees from the most intense heat.
    "Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect."
    "Seek first the kingdom of Heaven..."
    "Every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment"

    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1033
    • Reputation: +883/-230
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #9 on: January 10, 2025, 10:46:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Right, it burned WHILE he was filiming the Rogan show ...
    https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1877707445541175785
    I'm 80 percent sure Gibson is in the club.
    They need Mel Gibsons.

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 14921
    • Reputation: +6189/-917
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #10 on: January 10, 2025, 11:05:07 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Have you every tried to burn a live tree? It's not easy. They are full of water, and are designed to be fire resistant. No doubt they will show signs of fire damage due to cells dying from getting too hot, though not hot enough to scorch. Houses on the other hand are made of extremely dry low density wood and petroleum products. They will burn much more readily and quickly, and if they had brick walls, those walls will have been a barrier to help protect the trees from the most intense heat.
    Makes sense, thanks. I was wondering the same thing as Pax. 
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse


    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47342
    • Reputation: +28019/-5237
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #11 on: January 10, 2025, 11:21:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm 80 percent sure Gibson is in the club.
    They need Mel Gibsons.

    I don't believe that he's there willingly, but that he got compromised, drawn in, and is now under duress to stay there.  One one level, they, i.e. the club, don't care much about Traditional Catholics, since we're such a minority, so he can go off the reservation, as it were, on those subjects ... but I think he's severely limited, since I'm certain that he knows a lot more than he's ever said.  He keeps hinting at this, that, or the other thing ... but never spills the beans or gives the details or names names -- similar to others out there (like Caviezel).  If they do try, they'll get drugged up (Kanye) or killed (various celebrities, always found dead in hotel bathtubs ... or else Kappy-ed).

    Unfortunately, before THEY let you become this famous and make this much money, etc. ... they have to be sure that of being able to control you.  Otherwise, Gibson would have just stayed a B-move actor his entire career.  Talent isn't enough, and in some cases, mostly Jews / Jewesses, talent isn't required.

    So I think it's 100% that he's under control and/or compromised ... though it's not willingly on his part (and he doesn't have the courage to make that ultimate sacrifice).  You can see something going on upstairs with the crazy / darting eyes that he's constantly having debates and conflicts in his own head ... I've known others who have had the same expressions and it's because of some schizophrenic type of disorder, where they're torn, and so always debating and dialoging with themselves in their own mind.  He could even have been MK-Ultra...ed, the point of which is precisely to create that personality split.  You can see that they're tormented in some way.

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47342
    • Reputation: +28019/-5237
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #12 on: January 10, 2025, 11:25:14 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • But, the cover story for "live" trees is nonsense ... as the bark is very dry and the leaves would also go up very easily and very quickly.  Have you ever tried to burn steel or concrete?  And most building codes require fire retardant materials.  Cars are being instantly oxidized (rusted out).  Biden let it slip out last time (in a break of dementia) that the buildings that were not destroyed (in Maui) all had blue roofs, and various experts explained that this would be the hallmark of certain wavelenghths of direct energy weapons.

    Those trees are untouched.  Due to the moisture withint the core of the tree, they might "survive" ultimately and come back to life, but they're going to certainly LOOK dead on the outside, with the bark scorched off and the foliage gone.

    And pay no attention to the fact that multiple sources have revealed that some insurers, just a few months ago, cancelled nearly all the fire insurance for most of the homes in these affected neighborhoods.

    Offline moneil

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 768
    • Reputation: +608/-62
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #13 on: January 10, 2025, 12:01:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    So there are cars that are so burned, they look like a very old and used metal firepit.  But there's still trees, unburned, in the middle of everything?  Makes no sense.  More proof these are not normal fires.



    Quote
    Have you every tried to burn a live tree? It's not easy. They are full of water, and are designed to be fire resistant. No doubt they will show signs of fire damage due to cells dying from getting too hot, though not hot enough to scorch. Houses on the other hand are made of extremely dry low density wood and petroleum products. They will burn much more readily and quickly, and if they had brick walls, those walls will have been a barrier to help protect the trees from the most intense heat.

    Thank you St. Giles for a reality based reply.  Trees, and all plants, have a vascular system and contain moisture, making them more difficult to burn.  Cars are thin pot metal and plastic, plus having a combustible fuel within them (gasoline, lubricants), they will be devoured by heat and flame fairly quickly.  Natural phenomena follows a "path of least resistance".  Fires, after burning up the dry wood and cedar shake roof of a house and blackening the autos, rather than wasting their energy on the "wet wood" of trees, will move along to more combustible material if they are available, especially if propelled by wind.

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47342
    • Reputation: +28019/-5237
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mel on Joe Rogan
    « Reply #14 on: January 10, 2025, 12:33:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "More difficult" to burn, maybe ... but not impossible, given the infernos, and especially when there not even being scorched or losing their foliage.  We have trees out there practically in contact with buildings burned down to the foundation (with even much of the foundation reduced to rubble), where the trees themselves retain their foliage and don't even show the bark being singed.  No, bark does not contain significant moisture and would burn easily.  Simply not possible.  If you were following X, you'd know that various physicists have chimed in on these grounds to say the results of the fires are not natural.  Some of you guys are just so naive and gullible, and it even seems to carry over into where several of you don't even really believe in Sacred Scripture and like Fr. Paul Robinson, attempt to explain away everything in the Scriptures as if they were natural, ruling out the preter- or super- natural and/or miracuous.  You've so enamored of science and trusting of the media, government, and scientific establishment ... operating under some kind of normalcy bias.

    So, bark only contains significant moisture if it's been raining a lot ... and the dryness if what they were initially blaming on the fires, so it's one or the other ... either it was so dry that bark should be going up in flames (since everything was allegedly so dry as to be a tinder box) or else if it wasn't dry, then there's also no natural explanation for the fires.